Please test!
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v1.3/
Here's the changes since 1.3.1:
* Fix missing last bit in hwloc_linux_get_thread_cpubind().
Thanks to Carolina Gómez-Tostón Gutiérrez for reporting the issue.
* Fix build with -mcmodel=medium. Thanks to Devendar Bureddy for reportin
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 08 Feb 2012 17:59:04 +0100, a écrit :
> Please test!
>
> http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v1.3/
Could somebody test it on AIX, and with xlc?
Thanks,
Samuel
On 2/8/2012 9:18 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 08 Feb 2012 17:59:04 +0100, a écrit :
Please test!
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v1.3/
Could somebody test it on AIX, and with xlc?
Thanks,
Samuel
No AIX, but I will hit xlc on Linux again today.
Do we care abo
On 2/8/2012 8:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
* Detect when a compiler such as xlc may not report compile errors
properly, causing some configure checks to be wrong. Thanks to
Paul H. Hargrove for reporting the problem and providing a patch.
Looks like I botched this one!
I have added two L
On 2/8/2012 8:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
* Fix conversion from/to Linux libnuma when some NUMA nodes have no memory.
Tests on the virtual node I have access to where that problem report
originated is still not quite right.
There is now a different assertion failing than I had seen before:
l
Le 08/02/2012 22:33, Paul H. Hargrove a écrit :
>
>
> On 2/8/2012 8:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>> * Fix conversion from/to Linux libnuma when some NUMA nodes have no
>> memory.
>
> Tests on the virtual node I have access to where that problem report
> originated is still not quite right.
> There is
Le 08/02/2012 22:10, Paul H. Hargrove a écrit :
>> configure: WARNING: Please report this failure, and configure using a
>> different C compiler if possible.
>> configure: error: Cannot continue.
> configure: WARNING: Your C compiler does not consider incorrect
> argument counts to be a fatal error
On 2/8/2012 1:44 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
By the way, do we need -qhalt=E or -qhalt=e ? Your mail uses both.
They are equivalent according to my testing.
-Paul
--
Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
HPC Research Department T
On 2/8/2012 1:37 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Let's ignore this for 1.3.2. libnuma sucks, we're wasting way too much
time trying to make it sane. I'll look later if I find an easy way to
reproduce.
OK, fine by me.
I've verified that if I "disarm" that test, then the remaining tests PASS.
-Paul
-
On 2/8/2012 1:10 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 2/8/2012 8:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
* Detect when a compiler such as xlc may not report compile errors
properly, causing some configure checks to be wrong. Thanks to
Paul H. Hargrove for reporting the problem and providing a patch.
Lo
On 2/8/2012 1:44 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Ah, we need to use $hwloc_c_vendor instead. That's where's
$hwloc_check_compiler_vendor_result ends up before being cleared.
It looks like something is very wrong here:
Examining the 1.3.2rc1 tarball I seem to see $hwloc_c_vendor is read but
NOT wri
On 2/8/2012 8:58 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Please test!
http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/v1.3/
I have access to BG/L, BG/P, Cray-XT and Cray-XE systems.
Are there any tests I could/should consider running on those?
-Paul
--
Paul H. Hargrove phhargr...@lbl.
On 2/8/2012 2:08 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
It seems that xlc dislikes some wchar constants (see below).
In a build w/ default CFLAGS they produce an "(E)" level message, but
compilation continues to completion.
With the recommended CFLAGS=-qhalt=e these become fatal:
CC lstopo-lstopo
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
> Option #4:
>CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077'
> Appears to work for me for xlc-8.0 and xlc-9.0.
That still looks dangerous to me: we don't know whatever warning
might be added in the future. I'd rather add -qhalt=e only for t
On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
Option #4:
CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077'
Appears to work for me for xlc-8.0 and xlc-9.0.
That still looks dangerous to me: we don't know whatever warning
might be added in th
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:41:47 +0100, a écrit :
> On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
> >>Option #4:
> >>CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077'
> >>Appears to work for me for xlc-8.0 and xlc-9.0.
> >That sti
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:43:56 +0100, a écrit :
> Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:41:47 +0100, a écrit :
> > On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > >Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
> > >>Option #4:
> > >>CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1
On 2/8/2012 4:43 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:41:47 +0100, a écrit :
On 2/8/2012 4:31 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Paul H. Hargrove, le Thu 09 Feb 2012 01:28:53 +0100, a écrit :
Option #4:
CFLAGS='-qhalt=e -qsuppress=1506-077'
Appears to work for me fo
On 2/8/2012 4:41 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
I do agree w/ Samuel that the BEST solution is to apply "-qhalt=e"
ONLY to the test(s) where one expects the compiler to through errors
(rather than warnings) for function calls with argument counts which
don't match the prototypes. At the momen
On 2/8/2012 4:47 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
On 2/8/2012 4:41 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
I do agree w/ Samuel that the BEST solution is to apply "-qhalt=e"
ONLY to the test(s) where one expects the compiler to through errors
(rather than warnings) for function calls with argument counts
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.4.1a1r4284
Start time: Wed Feb 8 21:01:02 EST 2012
End time: Wed Feb 8 21:03:59 EST 2012
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.3.2rc2r4281
Start time: Wed Feb 8 21:03:59 EST 2012
End time: Wed Feb 8 21:07:01 EST 2012
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.2.3a1r4283
Start time: Wed Feb 8 21:07:01 EST 2012
End time: Wed Feb 8 21:09:44 EST 2012
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1.3rc1r4282
Start time: Wed Feb 8 21:09:44 EST 2012
End time: Wed Feb 8 21:12:38 EST 2012
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.0.4a1r4280
Start time: Wed Feb 8 21:12:38 EST 2012
End time: Wed Feb 8 21:15:00 EST 2012
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
25 matches
Mail list logo
