On 06/24/2010 11:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 24.06.2010, at 09:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
>> 0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
>> decided that it will be best to keep th
On 06/24/2010 09:37 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
>> Perhaps we should instead be talking about whatever role
>> describes the people who /do/ care about the code that goes in?
>
> Programmer. Implementor. Product manager. :-)
>
> I think the vi
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 20:06 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
>> Do we have a meeting at our usual time of 11am EST in #sugar-meeting?
>> We've got quite the agenda to go through:
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes#Agenda_
Hi All...
Thanks to everyone who helped with last night's problem, installing os180py on
an XO-1. At last it is sucessfully installed and running!
Here are the things I did to get it to work:
1) Downloaded to a different usb drive (still a fairly new SanDisk, but 2GB
instead of 4)
2) Ma
On 25 June 2010 14:39, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Saturday I need to show someone via Skype how to use the XO as a book
> reader. So far no luck with it. I have tried both the Read Activity and
> the Read E Texts Activity and can't seem to get either to work well. Are
> there any really good inst
Hi All...
I haven't given up on os180py yet. I am doing the downloads again to a
different usb stick. It is going better. No stalls yet, just the seventh blink
on the drive is always a bit longer than the rest. Strange.
Saturday I need to show someone via Skype how to use the XO as a book r
El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 20:06 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
> Do we have a meeting at our usual time of 11am EST in #sugar-meeting?
> We've got quite the agenda to go through:
> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes#Agenda_items
I will probably not make it tomorrow. as I have another m
Good material to the wiki!!
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
> A few days ago I asked for links to sites with free digital textbooks.
> Thanks to all who sent links. I thought it would be a good idea to put them
> all in one place and share them with
Do we have a meeting at our usual time of 11am EST in #sugar-meeting?
We've got quite the agenda to go through:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes#Agenda_items
I'll be there, and logging/thinking-through some of this stuff myself,
and doing what I can to work on it, regardless of
Hello Ian. Didn't mean to bother with this problem, but personally I find
it very pertinent to this list, where always has been a great suppport
around Sugar. So as this community helped me solve the problem, I am moved
to be give my report back.
Gonzalo, effectively as I lowered the Persistant
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michael Stone wrote:
> Perhaps we should instead be talking about whatever role
> describes the people who /do/ care about the code that goes in?
Programmer. Implementor. Product manager. :-)
I think the view is that features have their own "drivers" (motivated
p
El Wed, 23-06-2010 a las 09:49 -0400, Martin Langhoff escribió:
> that's exactly my "side" :-) -- I see SL as the place where companies
> (yours), foundations (OLPC!) and independent hackers with various
> motivations meet and collaborate).
This is *exactly* how I see SL, too. Quoting Tomeu:
>>
Hi All,
A few days ago I asked for links to sites with free digital textbooks. Thanks
to all who sent links. I thought it would be a good idea to put them all in one
place and share them with you all. (I'm sorry the formatting of this page
seems to have a mind of its own!)
>From Tabitha Rode
Simon wrote:
> What do others think about this?
I'm glad that you have a proposal that excites Bernie, Bert, and Tomeu.
I'm not sure what to think for myself because I don't know whether I
correctly understood your intent from my reading of your, Bernie's,
and Tomeu's words. (See below.)
Bernie
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 18:15, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 10:44 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
>> > What do others think about this?
>>
>> A big +1 from me, thanks a lot for taking this task once more, it is
>> really important for Sugar.
>
> A big +1 from me too! Thank you,
El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 10:44 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
> > What do others think about this?
>
> A big +1 from me, thanks a lot for taking this task once more, it is
> really important for Sugar.
A big +1 from me too! Thank you, Simon!
Regarding proposed patches, during our development cycl
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 24.06.2010, at 15:29, David Farning wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> To that extent I proposed to the Etoys developers to follow the Sugar
>>> development cycle more closely. And that's
On 24.06.2010, at 15:29, David Farning wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg
> wrote:
>>
>> To that extent I proposed to the Etoys developers to follow the Sugar
>> development cycle more closely. And that's what we're going to do.
>
> Thanks Bert. That will help those o
On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:29 AM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
> Hi Chris, James, and All...
>
> Thanks for the quick replies, Chris and James!
>
> But, I'm still trying!
>
> I did the "probe usb" command. it returned with:
>
> /pci/u...@f , 5/s...@3,0
> /pci/u...@f , 5/w...@0,0
> /pci/u...@f , 5/s...@3,
"wp" (Write Protect) and all other tags are defined here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Manufacturing_data#Defined_Tags
Kevin Cole wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:11, Chris Ball wrote:
Hi,
> No wp tag
It means that disable-security has already been run once, so you don't
have to do i
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:11, Chris Ball wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > No wp tag
>
> It means that disable-security has already been run once, so you don't
> have to do it again. (We might want to make it say that explicitly.)
So, "wp" = "write protect" (or some close variation like "write
protection")?
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> On 24.06.2010, at 09:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
>> 0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
>> decided that it will be best
On 24.06.2010, at 09:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
> 0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
> decided that it will be best to keep this role for some more time. I
> think it will be imp
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
> 0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
> decided that it will be best to keep this role for some more time. I
> think it will be i
Hi,
in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
decided that it will be best to keep this role for some more time. I
think it will be important for Sugar that we keep some continuation of
the proces
25 matches
Mail list logo
