Hi,
in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
decided that it will be best to keep this role for some more time. I
think it will be important for Sugar that we keep some continuation of
the
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 09:32, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.de wrote:
Hi,
in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
decided that it will be best to keep this role for some more time. I
On 24.06.2010, at 09:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
decided that it will be best to keep this role for some more time. I
think it will be
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 24.06.2010, at 09:32, Simon Schampijer wrote:
Hi,
in May I tried to find someone to replace me as release manager [1] for
0.90, but as nobody has stepped up to do the job as we defined it I
decided that it will
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:11, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
No wp tag
It means that disable-security has already been run once, so you don't
have to do it again. (We might want to make it say that explicitly.)
So, wp = write protect (or some close variation like write
wp (Write Protect) and all other tags are defined here:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Manufacturing_data#Defined_Tags
Kevin Cole wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 04:11, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
No wp tag
It means that disable-security has already been run once, so you don't
On Jun 24, 2010, at 1:29 AM, Caryl Bigenho wrote:
Hi Chris, James, and All...
Thanks for the quick replies, Chris and James!
But, I'm still trying!
I did the probe usb command. it returned with:
/pci/u...@f , 5/s...@3,0
/pci/u...@f , 5/w...@0,0
/pci/u...@f , 5/s...@3,0/disk
USB1
On 24.06.2010, at 15:29, David Farning wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de
wrote:
To that extent I proposed to the Etoys developers to follow the Sugar
development cycle more closely. And that's what we're going to do.
Thanks Bert. That will
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de wrote:
On 24.06.2010, at 15:29, David Farning wrote:
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:49 AM, Bert Freudenberg b...@freudenbergs.de
wrote:
To that extent I proposed to the Etoys developers to follow the Sugar
development cycle
El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 10:44 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
What do others think about this?
A big +1 from me, thanks a lot for taking this task once more, it is
really important for Sugar.
A big +1 from me too! Thank you, Simon!
Regarding proposed patches, during our development cycle we
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 18:15, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 10:44 +0200, Tomeu Vizoso escribió:
What do others think about this?
A big +1 from me, thanks a lot for taking this task once more, it is
really important for Sugar.
A big +1 from me too!
Simon wrote:
What do others think about this?
I'm glad that you have a proposal that excites Bernie, Bert, and Tomeu.
I'm not sure what to think for myself because I don't know whether I
correctly understood your intent from my reading of your, Bernie's,
and Tomeu's words. (See below.)
Bernie
El Wed, 23-06-2010 a las 09:49 -0400, Martin Langhoff escribió:
that's exactly my side :-) -- I see SL as the place where companies
(yours), foundations (OLPC!) and independent hackers with various
motivations meet and collaborate).
This is *exactly* how I see SL, too. Quoting Tomeu:
If
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Michael Stone mich...@laptop.org wrote:
Perhaps we should instead be talking about whatever role
describes the people who /do/ care about the code that goes in?
Programmer. Implementor. Product manager. :-)
I think the view is that features have their own
Hello Ian. Didn't mean to bother with this problem, but personally I find
it very pertinent to this list, where always has been a great suppport
around Sugar. So as this community helped me solve the problem, I am moved
to be give my report back.
Gonzalo, effectively as I lowered the Persistant
Do we have a meeting at our usual time of 11am EST in #sugar-meeting?
We've got quite the agenda to go through:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes#Agenda_items
I'll be there, and logging/thinking-through some of this stuff myself,
and doing what I can to work on it, regardless
Good material to the wiki!!
Gonzalo
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
A few days ago I asked for links to sites with free digital textbooks.
Thanks to all who sent links. I thought it would be a good idea to put them
all in one place and
El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 20:06 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
Do we have a meeting at our usual time of 11am EST in #sugar-meeting?
We've got quite the agenda to go through:
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Oversight_Board/Minutes#Agenda_items
I will probably not make it tomorrow. as I have another
Hi All...
I haven't given up on os180py yet. I am doing the downloads again to a
different usb stick. It is going better. No stalls yet, just the seventh blink
on the drive is always a bit longer than the rest. Strange.
Saturday I need to show someone via Skype how to use the XO as a book
On 25 June 2010 14:39, Caryl Bigenho cbige...@hotmail.com wrote:
Saturday I need to show someone via Skype how to use the XO as a book
reader. So far no luck with it. I have tried both the Read Activity and
the Read E Texts Activity and can't seem to get either to work well. Are
there any
Hi All...
Thanks to everyone who helped with last night's problem, installing os180py on
an XO-1. At last it is sucessfully installed and running!
Here are the things I did to get it to work:
1) Downloaded to a different usb drive (still a fairly new SanDisk, but 2GB
instead of 4)
2)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
El Thu, 24-06-2010 a las 20:06 -0400, Mel Chua escribió:
Do we have a meeting at our usual time of 11am EST in #sugar-meeting?
We've got quite the agenda to go through:
22 matches
Mail list logo
