On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Caryl Bigenho
wrote:
> To reply would require naming names, times, and places. I prefer not to
> get that personal. The issues I refer to have been discussed at length by
> others in the past.
>
I had asked you off list so that you could
To reply would require naming names, times, and places. I prefer not to get
that personal. The issues I refer to have been discussed at length by others in
the past.
Caryl
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 24, 2016, at 5:31 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Tue,
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> $600 is plenty serious :)
So, for $600 anyone can contribute random code which will be used
___
IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
Hi Caryl
I totally agree. We should not require dues. We can ask for donations.
While the story is confused, my understanding is that the funds which
you described as 'carelessly disbursed' were from a grant and not from
donations to Sugar Labs.
Tony
On 05/24/2016 08:40 AM, Caryl Bigenho
Hi All….
Busy time for us so I haven't had a chance to chime in on the motion for
"dues." I personally do not care to contribute any unearmarked funds to
SugarLabs. I am not at all pleased at the way funds have been carelessly
disbursed to a select few in the past and feel no need to send my