Hi
You mean the https://kidswrite.org blog? :)
On 13 June 2016 at 21:47, Sora Edwards-Thro wrote:
> I'll be printing a poster, which I can put on my blog linked to
> planet.laptop.org if I figure out how to format it so it displays properly
> on a screen. I plan to write
Hi
On 13 June 2016 at 22:06, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
>
> I do not believe we would get significant new traction by trying to sell
> XO-1s.
Please enumerate why you think this.
Would XO-4s be any better?
> If we truly are going to force end of support in 2020, we should
Having thought about this a bit more since this morning, I believe the best
course of action would be to ask the recycler to directly donate the XO-1s
to one or more projects which already accept them on a donation basis.
These include the Columbus School for Girls (http://csgolpc.weebly.com/ ),
I'll be printing a poster, which I can put on my blog linked to
planet.laptop.org if I figure out how to format it so it displays properly
on a screen. I plan to write up my results in a formal paper once we get
the data from the pilot concluding in June.
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Dave
Hi Sora
I'm curious about your presentation that is coming up in a couple of
weeks - will your slides be available online? :)
On 31 March 2016 at 12:31, Sora Edwards-Thro wrote:
> I'll be there presenting research on a literacy project with XOs in Haiti.
>
> On Thu, Mar
On 13 June 2016 at 17:16, Sean DALY wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
>>
>> what do you see as the difference in terms of sugar feedback?
>
> Students not using their native language, teachers at far lower level,
> daunting
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> what do you see as the difference in terms of sugar feedback?
Students not using their native language, teachers at far lower level,
daunting infrastructure difficulties which mean limited laptop time, very
limited
On 13 June 2016 at 13:52, Samuel Greenfeld wrote:
> I think if you tell the sponsor you want a stash to sell them, they'll be
> more than happy to keep them to sell for themselves.
I doubt it - due to the labour costs you describe below :)
> What Walter and I are getting
I think if you tell the sponsor you want a stash to sell them, they'll be
more than happy to keep them to sell for themselves.
What Walter and I are getting at is that is servicing & reshipping 172 XOs
(even if they come with 254 chargers + extra batteries) takes a lot more
work than you may
On 13 June 2016 at 04:19, Sam Parkinson wrote:
> $100 seems steep for an XO1.
We could also offer a 100% buy-back scheme to get them back if they
aren't used regularly, and various discounts up to 100% for developers
who want to pay $0 but are actively contributing.
>
On 13 June 2016 at 11:54, Sean DALY wrote:
> What duplication? An island fishing community with a single one-room
> school is quite a different place from an American classroom
I think there's probably more education going on in the former, but
what do you see as the
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Its a big market.
OK, if I understand you correctly, your idea is to recruit Sugar developers
by selling them XO-1s individually?
This would be more efficient than engaging a computer science professor
with a class,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> > OLPC France has managed the Nosy Komba, Madagascar microdeployment for
> years
> > now in partnership with other NGOs and the learnings have been fantastic.
>
> Great! No need to duplicate that :)
What duplication? An
Off the top of my head, the bulk chargers do 10 batteries at a time. I have
two to donate to a large order.
-walter
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 13 June 2016 at 04:07, Sean DALY wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:53
Hi
On 13 June 2016 at 04:07, Sean DALY wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, i think this is a good idea, but i don't think buying and selling to
>> make profit is part of SL's agenda. I'm i wrong?
>
> If
On 13 June 2016 at 07:05, Walter Bender wrote:
> Google just donated 8000 chromebooks to the X-Prize. Maybe we could try to
> go that route?
Well, are we supporting XO-1s in the next 3 releases or not?
If we are, I think people get EXCITED about 'the little green $100
I have to say I with Samuel Greenfeld on this one. There are lots of
potential issues with these machines (depending upon how they have been
stored and maintained.) They could well have dead batteries (both the main
battery and the battery for the RTC). They most certainly will need an
investment
they mean loading dock i.e. where you send the truck
Sean
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Sam Parkinson
wrote:
> Dave, I don't frequent EBay listings, but it says:
>
> > Customer is responsible for arrangement of freight trucking pickup and
> insurance from our
Dave, I don't frequent EBay listings, but it says:
> Customer is responsible for arrangement of freight trucking pickup
and insurance from our dock
Is that referring to the charging docks or the palette of laptops?
Obviously this is a small detail that doesn't effect the discussion,
but it
Hi Dave,
They are XO1s... does Sugar run OK on the XO1?
$100 seems steep for an XO1. In the USA, apparently less than $100
yeilds you a "tablet" from "Walmart" (can't vouch for anything... just
searched it on the net) [1]. Maybe sell it for less? Or try $100 and
see if we need to go
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Chihurumnaya Ibiam <
ibiamchihurumn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, i think this is a good idea, but i don't think buying and selling to
> make profit is part of SL's agenda. I'm i wrong?
If proceeds from the sale(s) benefit the organization and not individuals,
Hi, i think this is a good idea, but i don't think buying and selling to
make profit is part of SL's agenda. I'm i wrong?
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
> Hi
>
>
>
22 matches
Mail list logo