> No, the problem we discussed here is not a regression.
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10658
> And the patch just works for the laptops that:
> 1. without passive trip point
> 2. with a passive trip point that doesn't help because it is too close
> to the critical trip point.
Ok.
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
>> So what is the status here, how should we proceed?
>> This isn't applied to any tree yet?
>> IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on
>> the test branch and keep it a
Do we have a final patch for this yet? I assume it needs at least more
entries in the DMI list as Henrique pointed out?
-Andi
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest L
Thomas Renninger wrote:
> This came in in OpenSUSE 10.3. When we still had overriden thermal polling
> frequency (what we probably will do again soon). It has been tested that
> specific ThinkPads do not throw a thermal event when exceeding the passive
> trip point. Even thermal polling was not eno
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 09:29:35AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:27:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > > Here a patchset with the thinkpad-acpi changes scheduled for 2.6.27.
&
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 03:27:48PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
>
> Andi,
>
> Here a patchset with the thinkpad-acpi changes scheduled for 2.6.27.
I tried to apply them to current Linus head (last change
to thinkpad-acpi 24e45bbe695719dca8c20e03d386eb6ea86526b5), but there were
ton
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> Change the code of hotkey_init, wan_init and bluetooth_init a bit to make it
> much easier to add some Kconfig-selected debugging code later.
The later seems to be wrong, the debugging code is already included?
Description seems to be incomplete.
-Andi
-
