There are many sites that run VTS with Multi Image Allocation. MIA should
have nothing
to do with performance of the Data transfer. If a device allocates slowly,
that could be
an opportunity for MIA. If you are in MODE=GROUP, you can adjust the cycle
time to be more responsive. I do recommend
Oops, sorry. The correct URL is "http://www.colesoft.com/utilities.html";.
Dave Cole
At 8/6/2005 07:09 PM, THarper wrote:
Dave,
Us peons can't access the colesoft web site "www.colesoft.com/utilities".:
"You are not authorized to view this page
You might not have permission to view this dir
For those of you who participate in the (totally online) SHARE "requirement
process", there are now 3 requirements for "phased in" mixed 31-/64-bit LE
(Language Environment) support. These are in the LNGC project.
If this is of interest to you now (or will be at some time in the
foreseeable futur
In a message dated 8/7/2005 1:17:49 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It is strange (now that you mention it) that RFC's were (at least in my
experience) were never attached in installation doc. That I agree
should be made mandatory.
>>
Yeah, put in an RFC, bottle
On Aug 7, 2005, at 2:01 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
Timothy,
Thanks.
There was at one time an FDP that encrypted any sequential file . I
don't know if its been withdrawn or not. IIRC it was cheap $100 ()
Ed
--
For IBM-M
As a bit of a public service -- and since many of the customers I work with
are trying to evaluate all their options for this pressing problem -- I
thought I'd list the products I know about that support tape encryption.
I'm keenly interested to hear if I forgot any -- thanks.
Please note that any
On Aug 7, 2005, at 12:07 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
--SNIP-
Mostly it's still a craft mentality. They assume qualified people
with up to date skill sets will be installing current
software to run multi-million/billion/trillion dollar enterprises and
co
In a message dated 8/7/2005 10:35:58 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree. IBM has IMO taken the road of the vulcan mind meld and the
secret handshake. This is another sad case of a simple basics that IBM
has decided that is secret.
>>
Mostly it's still a craft
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400, Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>"IBM intends to deliver a software-based file encryption solution for z/OS
>>that leverages the existing z/OS key management capabilities provided
>>within the Integrated Cryptographic Services Facility (ICSF) in 2005. More
On Aug 7, 2005, at 12:19 AM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 18:23 -0400 on 08/06/2005, Thomas Conley wrote about Re:
Downloading CBPDO RIM Files:
- Original Message -
From: "Robert A. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2005 3:18
Hi All
I'm sorry, but I didn't get any response yet, and I wonder for the reason :
- May be the question was not well noticed (sent at end of the week) ?
- Is the combination of VTS and MIA so rare ? or do all VTS clients use
AUTO-SWitch ?
We still do have performence problems for specific jo
Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
WatASS actually existed - It was called Assembler G. There was even some
code in a HASP Routine that processed Object Decks to support the Object
Decks it output (I think it had to do with better RLD Cards where ASMG
output the cards with more entries per card in some
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/05/2005
at 04:50 PM, Graeme Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>ISTR that the 1401 had a LAR too. Anyone else recall this?
The Store B Register (SBR) instruction could be used for subroutine
linkages. I have mercifully forgotten the details.
--
Shmuel (Seym
13 matches
Mail list logo
