Re: Volume Not Mounted

Hi all, The volume which I am trying to access is in Emulated Disk - OS/2 drive. I tried suggestions given by every one.. In all, I conclude the Path is Not Physically Available. I tried the following - DS P,0B81 RESPONSE=P390 IEE459I 02.07.01 DEVSERV PATHS 006 UNIT DTYPE M CNT VOLSER

Re: IBM 2914

Back in the early 80's. Hope narrowing the time frame helps with the search. - Paul Hanrahan -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Donzelli Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: IBM

Re: HSM and CA-Disk

Tom, 2086-350 Z/890 about 27k per year for HSM. Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Brannon Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 11:55 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HSM and CA-Disk Allan, You indicated

Strange Issue with LE/CICS/PLI

Everyone, (This was originally posted to the CICS-L list but had little response so I'm posting it here) We are in the process of converting our CICS regions to LE. We have a situation with a set of PLI programs that are not behaving as we expected when running under LE. What is happening

Re: Volume Not Mounted

The volume which I am trying to access is in Emulated Disk - OS/2 drive. I tried suggestions given by every one.. In all, I conclude the Path is Not Physically Available. I am facing this type of Volume related problem the first time. So please anyone let me know what needs to be done next

P390 problem - resolved by John Weis (T3 Technologies

My P390 is now up running as before the power failure. I want to thank everyone that provided me with help on my problem and especially M. John Weis from T3 Technologies which directed me exactly to what I need to do. Again, thanks to everyone. Richard

Re: ESOTERIC decomissioning

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:16:58 -0600, Big Iron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem with esoterics in the catalog is that there is a sequence number included in the device type entry, so if you remove one, all the other ones with larger sequence numbers will change; so if there are esoterics in

Re: ABC of Z/os

A tiny bit off topic, but does anyone have a pointer to the latest and greatest tome on how to do system maintenance? That is: various ways to do operating system updates/upgrades? Indirect catalogs, etc. The last one I saw was some years ago. I recall it even discussed (horrors) updating a

ISDEC do the loop...

The ISDEC() problem in HLASM I mentioned before is PMR 13359 now. (There seems to be a related APAR already: PK15306.) Thomas Berg -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL

Re: ABC of Z/os

I am doing that now...for new smpe 3.4, for the new receive from the internet without the hardware crypto card (uses Unix instead) the fact you should cone you sysres(1 and 2) and set up you smp using dddef environment (see os/390 software management cookbook sg24-4775) see also (mvs system

Re: HSM and CA-Disk

Thanks Kevin, I brought this up and was just told that DFHSM is a high cost item and therefore we would not reap a savings. I thought it was packaged with DFSMS as a no cost item. Can someone set me straight? Thanks Tom -- For

Re: strange issue with LER/CICS/PLI

Just curious, are you running McKesson's Health Quest software? [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2005 11:14 AM You write 'PL/I 2.3 . . . '. Is this a typo for PL/I 3.2? Or are you really way back there, which is a very bad place to be for using the LE. Current PL/I is Enterprise 3.4. John Gilmore

Re: HSM and CA-Disk

DFHSM works with DFSMS but it is not the same thing nor packaged with it. It is a separately-orderable product (actually called DFSMShsm). It is the same way with what used to be called DFDSS (now DFSMSdss) and RMM tape management. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: strange issue with LER/CICS/PLI

Richard Pinion wrote: Just curious, are you running McKesson's Health Quest software? Richard, If you trace back the history of the Mckesson software you will find that it was developed here at Duke initially with the help of IBM. We've kept our own copy of the software and updated/enhanced

Re: CA cuts 300 Customer advocate Positions (they had any?)

They gotta cut expenses somewhere to pay the PR consultants that came up with the latest re-branding, and all those new business cards. At least this time we probably don't have to worry about any CA reps coming to tell us, again, that everything is going to be better. It sounds like they're not

Re: ESOTERIC decomissioning

One could presumably assign tokens to match the existing numbers associated with those esoterics, Bill On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:14:17 -0800, Gabe Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mark, If Tokens were assigned, wouldn't any current cataloged dataset using an esoteric have to be uncataloged, then

Re: HSM and CA-Disk

Pommier, Rex R. wrote: DFHSM works with DFSMS but it is not the same thing nor packaged with it. It is a separately-orderable product (actually called DFSMShsm). It is the same way with what used to be called DFDSS (now DFSMSdss) and RMM tape management. To clarify: DFSMSdfp is free

Re: strange issue with LER/CICS/PLI

Thanks! We are running HQ here under z/OS 1.5, Enterprise PL/I for z/OS V 3R3M0, Enterprise Cobol V3R1M1, and whatever the LE version/release is for z/OS 1.5. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/17/2005 11:39 AM Richard Pinion wrote: Just curious, are you running McKesson's Health Quest software?

CDESPLIT flag and RMODE(SPLIT) question.

I have posted this question to the ibm-main newsgroup and it appears not to have made it to the listserver (I was under the impression that this was automatic). Therefore, I'm posting it to the listserver manually. My appologies if I have duplicated this posting here... I've created a test

Re: Sysplex and CPU Questions

On Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:52:48 +0200, Gil Peleg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Bruno, We too are victims of OA03194 and now waiting OA12848 to be closed... Currently living the the SLIP provided in the APAR. Do you have information about any progress with OA12848? Thanks, Gil. Yep Well .. here is

Guestimating TCO and ROI

Once upon a time, I seem to recall reading an article attributed to Gartner that proposed a ROT (rule of thumb) for estimating the total cost for a project at about 20% hardware/software and 80% 'hidden' costs. Anyone recall such an article and can point me to an authoritative source?

FTP Initial Directory

Is there any way I can change the initial 'directory' presented to a FTP user? I would like to use something other than their user ID for a HLQ. These are all standard z/os datasets, no OMVS. z/os.e 1.4 Thanks.

Re: Determining size information for existing QSAM dataset

In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 11/16/2005 at 04:18 PM, Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Specifically, if you do a RDJFCB after you open the dataset, will you get the merged information? Yes. Alternative, if you do an OPEN TYPE=J, will the information be merged into your in-storage JFCB? No.

Re: FTP Initial Directory

Perhaps you need to specify: - HLQ for the client end or the server end? - Is the client z/OS? Batch? TSO? - Do you want to make a server change that will affect all clients, or a CLIST, LOGON PROC or similar change that will affect clients running under that CLIST or LOGON? Charles