Of course, this all assumes that customers have workplace access to the
internet - not always true in some Asian Countries. Sending a URL to these
customers to download info from the internet is pretty much the same as
saying this page intentionally left blank.
The assumption the whole world is
Ron
I doubt that you'll find any company in this country with more than 10
employees without workplace access..
You mean the Brits never established 'post codes' in Hong Kong - pretty
slack if you ask me! :-)
Oh well another year almost over -- is the time between New Year
celebrations
Lately I am seeing a very large difference between the LPAR BUSY TIME PERC
and the MVS BUSY TIME PERC fields in the RMF CPU Activity report. The
difference is over 20% at peak hours. This was not the case before I started
using CF capping.
The CF LPAR used to guard MSUs has the highest weight on
Has anyone experienced this?? We have been working with IBM Level 3 for a
few days now trying to figure this out.
I saw if a couple of years ago.
In our case, HOD had fallen into the default OMVS service class (the sysprog
changed the name and didn't tell me).
This was multiple periods, and
_http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/37850-1.html_
(http://www.gcn.com/vol1_no1/daily-updates/37850-1.html)
Thought you were going to get a nice long trouble free holiday
didn't you?
Unregistering SHIMGVL.DLL is only partial:
_http://blogs.zdnet.com/Spyware/?p=735_
You're right Ted. In fact, I really dont want to share CPs with the CF.
However, the current soft-papping mechanism only allows to soft-cap an LPAR
to a certain amount of MSUs.
At first I used soft-cap. Then I noticed we encounter situations where one
LPAR is being soft-capped, while all the
At 15:40 -0600 on 12/30/2005, Dave Danner wrote about Re: Warning:
PTF's require HDS microcode, which is not avai:
The problem is not with SMP/E. I've been told that the internal IBM
systems that generate enhanced HOLDDATA are not capable of generating
ACTION, DEP, etc holds.
That is
Initially, neither program was authorized. I was using the ARCRPEXT
exit, which, I believe, is not authorized(AC=0),
That's a non-sequitur. The exit routine (typically) is NOT linked AC(1)
because that is only relevant for job step programs. The exit routine
must be loaded from an
From: Gil Peleg
At first I used soft-cap. Then I noticed we encounter situations where one
LPAR is being soft-capped, while all the others are not even close to
their
defined capacity. From my point of view, this is a poor allocation of
resources (which we are paying for). Obviously, If the
Jim Marshall wrote:
We are running z/OS V1R6 with Host-on-Demand V7 running within the HTTP
Server. We have noticed that the HTTP Server will just stop dispatching
tasks. After a while it will return to normal and go for many hours before
doing it again (already recycled it a few times).
http://news.independent.co.uk/business/news/article335867.ece
It has since emerged that the blaze could not have happened at a worse time
for the company.
Northgate duplicates its clients' information on computers at the site. At
around 7am every
morning a courier would collect the data on disk
McKown, John wrote:
We are going to add two new FICON cards to out z890. If you look at the
cage, there appears to be I/O slots for them. However, when the CE went
into something on the SE to determine the PCHIDs for me, he said that it
indicated that there weren't any I/O slots. The z890 book
Ted,
That's not quite right. RMF CPU busy is 1-(waittime/interval). There is no
MVS Busy field: it is actually CPU Wait Time that gets accumulated and CPU
busy is calculated from Wait Time.
If a Logical Instruction Processor (LIP) is pre-empted, then it is not in a
wait state and there is no
13 matches
Mail list logo
