converting a 3590E cartridge to a 3590B

2006-01-12 Thread גדי בן אבי
Hi, I need to send data to another site. Up until now we used 3480's. Now the other site wants to get rid of their 3480's. What they want to do is send us a 3590 cartridge that was taken out of their Silo. Since they have 3590E's we cannot write to these tapes (We have 3590B's). How can I

Re: Trying to find proper Red Book for Websphere Info

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Mason
John, Quoting text from your post directly in the newsgroup: I am trying to find the proper IBM redbook on how Websphere works on zOS and other S/390 platforms. If you want to find a red-something (something because there are redbooks and redpapers and maybe other red objects I haven't

Re: Microsoft panicing

2006-01-12 Thread Timothy Sipples
[] It would not surprise me one jot if some company, somewhere, has had a real disaster with Windows servers that we've just not heard about. We did hear about CardSystems in the press. It's not fair. The problem wasn't (at least directly) related to the OS. I saw lost data on Windows,

Re: TIMEMARK and JWT question

2006-01-12 Thread Thomas H Puddicombe
Unfortunately, in order to reconnect to an existing TSO session, you need to arrive with the same VTAM LUNAME as before - which is unlikely with TCP/IP. If you attempt to logon/reconnect from a different VTAM LUNAME, the message you get is already logged on, reply logon or logoff.

Re: USS Virus Scanner

2006-01-12 Thread Timothy Sipples
I found a report that Trend Micro's ScanMail antivirus software is supposed to be available for z/OS (and Linux on zSeries also) in the first half of 2006, so you might want to contact them. There are several for Linux on zSeries, such as F-PROT. - - - - - Timothy F. Sipples Consulting

Re: Microsoft panicing

2006-01-12 Thread R.S.
Timothy Sipples wrote: The press reports indicated that one (or more) Microsoft Windows servers at CardSystems became infected by a worm which exploited a security vulnerability in the operating system. The Windows servers were processing credit cards directly and/or had trusted access to an

Re: Microsoft panicing

2006-01-12 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Timothy Sipples [ snip ] The short version is that a single Microsoft Windows worm functionally bankrupted a credit card processing company and cost the industry huge, ongoing sums. Sounds pretty directly

Re: Restrict ftp access to a certain HFS directory

2006-01-12 Thread FEJOS Tamas
Thank you! Is there any easier method? -- Üdvözlettel/Best regards:FEJOS Tamas (TMS) z/OS Systems Programmer, http://www.ferrinfo.hu gpg --keyserver hkp://pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys CDC7F2D3 ___

Re: Restrict ftp access to a certain HFS directory

2006-01-12 Thread R.S.
FEJOS Tamas wrote: Thank you! Is there any easier method? IMHO it depends on what you exactly need. It can be done using chmod + RESTRICTED attribute + some RACF commands. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: RSM tuning

2006-01-12 Thread Wayne Driscoll
This DFSORT requirement, along with the subset license is new with DB2 Version 8, but I would assume will be an ongoing requirement. Wayne Driscoll Product Developer JME Software LLC NOTE: All opinions are strictly my own. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Upcoming IBM Proof-of-Technology (PoT) Sessions

2006-01-12 Thread Timothy Sipples
I thought I'd let everyone on the list know of an IBM program that's available to you, at least in the Americas, but please pay close attention to the groundrules, OK? IBM Software offers no-charge Proof of Technology sessions. These are hands-on sessions where you get to sit in front of an

Re: Latest from Denver

2006-01-12 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/11/2006 at 02:53 PM, Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It seems nowadays that two of the qualifications for political appointment nowadays are corruptibility and incompetence. Your state's new CIO is obviously at least half-qualified for the job You forgot

Re: limited Numbers of TSO users on z/OS.e

2006-01-12 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/11/2006 at 04:29 PM, John Cousins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Anyone found a way round the limit of 8 concurrent TSO users when running under z/OS.e. If all that you're doing is to edit and submit jobs, look at SuperWylbur. Well, it does a few other things as well,

Re: z/OS 1.6 JES2 NJE link

2006-01-12 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/11/2006 at 03:47 PM, Roger Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Help! Please! I have a z/OS 1.4 and a z/OS 1.6 system connected by a CTCA You need to get your VTAM parameters right before you worry about the JES2 parameters. You didn't show a definition for the CTCA. If

Re: z/OS 1.6 JES2 NJE link

2006-01-12 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/11/2006 at 09:09 PM, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: It would appear that one of your VTAM systems has NetID P390 and the other has NetID ADCD. In order to connect two VTAMs with different NetIDs over a channel-to-channel connection, you need to use APPN.

ADTMAG Article - Big Iron pessimism persists

2006-01-12 Thread John Wynton
Folks: I'd be interested in comments, observations on the following article http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=17775. Is, as they say, The cost of running COBOL, Assembly and other traditional mainframe workloads is still prohibitively expensive, true? It's important to us, as a training

DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 8:58 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RSM tuning On Jan 11, 2006, at 1:23 PM, McKown, John wrote:

SMPE novice question - expanding and zapping a load module

2006-01-12 Thread Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD.
I know SMPE like the back of my shoulder. I know it's there but not much else. I need to prepare SMPE commands to expand and zap a single CSECT within a load module. Can I just place the EXPAND statement right after the ++ZAP's NAME statement? What about equivalents of linkage edit's MODE and

Re: CICS installation tape to file

2006-01-12 Thread McKown, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jerry Ragland Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 1:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: CICS installation tape to file Hi all, I am having CICS 3.1 installation on 3490 tape (2

Re: RSM tuning

2006-01-12 Thread Frank Yaeger
John McKown on 01/11/2006 11:23:50 AM: DB2 absolutely requires DFSORT for some of its internal functions. Syncsort is documented to not work with DB2. DB2 comes with a subset license for this purpose. I.e. you don't have a general DFSORT license. See the following Informational APAR for more

Re: converting a 3590E cartridge to a 3590B

2006-01-12 Thread Bruce Black
I tried using IEHINITT. It completed with RC0 but the job abended with: IOS000I 0D03,1E,IOE,02,0600,,**,,N640HE67 004910D050205451 2402FF30C0003A9F C5F1F0F0F0F20290 41042300A3521210 UNSUPPORTED FORMAT You contradicted yourself. You said it completed with

Re: RSM tuning

2006-01-12 Thread Jay Maynard
On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:46:22AM -0800, Frank Yaeger wrote: John McKown on 01/11/2006 11:23:50 AM: DB2 absolutely requires DFSORT for some of its internal functions. Syncsort is documented to not work with DB2. DB2 comes with a subset license for this purpose. I.e. you don't have a

Re: ADTMAG Article - Big Iron pessimism persists

2006-01-12 Thread Hal Merritt
They sell PC related services. What else would they say? My $0.02 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Wynton Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: ADTMAG Article - Big Iron pessimism

Third Party Maintenance Providers

2006-01-12 Thread Larry Kraus
Just curious how many companies are using third party providers for their mainframe maintenance? If you are using someone other than IBM, is anyone using QSGI? Disclaimer: This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended

Re: CICS installation tape to file

2006-01-12 Thread Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
Get rid of tapes and use ShopzSeries to order/download the files into a USS path(zFS or HFS) and the run GIMUNZIP. Roland -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

PSP Buckets for new z/OS

2006-01-12 Thread Alan Schwartz
While I'm installing z/OS 1.7 this seems to apply to the previous releases. A number of us here recall the PSP buckets for MVS upgrades used to include information about maintenance or other items that needed to be done by CICS/IMS/DB2 support. If memory serves (not as much as it used to)

Re: limited Numbers of TSO users on z/OS.e

2006-01-12 Thread Paul Gilmartin
In a recent note, Knutson, Sam said: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:57:56 -0500 Move away from using TSO to submit jobs and monitor work using products like E(JES) or just native z/OS FTP. There seem to be a lot of people doing that out there.

Re: SMPE novice question - expanding and zapping a load module

2006-01-12 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:43:09 -0600 Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :I know SMPE like the back of my shoulder. I know it's there but not much :else. :I need to prepare SMPE commands to expand and zap a single CSECT within a :load module. :Can I just place the EXPAND

Re: RSM tuning

2006-01-12 Thread Knutson, Sam
Hi Jay, Some of the reasons cited in public for the change to require/entitle DFSort for use with DB2 V8 * V8 removes the pre-req for an external sort product * V8 will only use the DFSort package: SORT, MERGE functions only *Aim to improve reliability and performance *DFSort

Re: PSP Buckets for new z/OS

2006-01-12 Thread Toole, Michael
The information is on IBMLINK under Preventive Service Planning. The upgrade is ZOSV1R7. Michael Toole Product Consultant OS/390 Support 313-336-1783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz Sent:

Re: PSP Buckets for new z/OS

2006-01-12 Thread Alan Schwartz
I've looked in there. These items are the various products that are installed in the z/OS zone. Is there a subset I've overlooked? Alan Schwartz Assurant Shared Business Services Lead Systems Programmer Phone: 651-361-4758 Fax: 651-361-5625 Toole, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:

Re: PSP Buckets for new z/OS

2006-01-12 Thread Toole, Michael
Z/OS consists of multiple products. You have to look in each one. For example, I found that CICS/TS 2.3 needs UQ95648 applied by looking in the LE subset. Michael Toole Product Consultant OS/390 Support 313-336-1783 [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: PSP Buckets for new z/OS

2006-01-12 Thread Alan Schwartz
You're right. Perhaps this oversight was caused by the simplification of being able to click on one link to order all fixes. You may think each bucket doesn't need to be reviewed. Alan Schwartz Assurant Shared Business Services Lead Systems Programmer Phone: 651-361-4758 Fax:

Re: DFSMShsm 3592 carts money

2006-01-12 Thread Ted MacNEIL
DFHSM is a band aid we use because we cannot force users to manage their DASD usage. So, we migrate it from DASD to tape, then eventually delete it. This is a political fix. Other than that, I agree that keeping it DASD resident would be better. I strongly disagree. Users should be insulated

Re: SMPE novice question - expanding and zapping a load module

2006-01-12 Thread Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc
This is what I used in the past ++USERMOD(ALTCP01) /* THE NAME IS ARBITRARY */ . ++VER(Z038) FMID(HIP6140) PRE(UQ72124) /* THIS ZAP

Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread Ted MacNEIL
The only reason that I know of it is due to a LARGE spat of messages on the DB2 list when version 8 hit the streets. Lots of frustrated Syncsort customers with why?!? questions. It was supposed to come as part of the package. IE: Nearly transparent. Obviously, the DB2 packaging people have

Re: converting a 3590E cartridge to a 3590B

2006-01-12 Thread ??? ?? ???
What I meant to say was the the IEHINITT job succeeded. The job that attemted to write to the cartridge failed. Gadi From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Bruce Black Sent: Thu 12/01/2006 17:53 To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: converting a

HSM - VTS Versus 3494

2006-01-12 Thread Jim Marshall
Just thought I'd bring up a point people might overlook. When I first explored the subject, IBM's recommendation was not to put HSM migrated files into the VTS. The rationale says that on native drives, HSM retrievals are done using Note Point to the cartridge location of the file. When I got to

Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread Dean Montevago
I'm jumping in late here. I read some of the thread. DB2 V7 uses Syncsort, I know this because we recently had a problem at DR. We are a DFSORT shop. Are we saying that in DB2 V8 it uses only DFSORT ? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread Johnson, William
DB2 V8 uses DFSORT. Here is a good explanation. http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=0uid=isg1II14047 Bill Johnson Systems Programmer Antares Management Solutions 23700 Commerce Park Rd. Beachwood, Ohio 44122 216-292-0400 x3478 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread Dean Montevago
Thank. I just printed it. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johnson, William Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning) DB2 V8 uses DFSORT.

Deleting a Catlog entry aka DSN not on Voluem

2006-01-12 Thread Howard Rifkind
I'm trying to delete the entry I see in a 3.4 display from a volume. I have used NVR but the dataset didn't go away. There really isn't thing on the volume except the following: SYS1.VTOCIX.ZHFS01 SYS1.VVDS.VZHFS01 Only the DSN comes up when I go after it with the cataloged

Re: HSM - VTS Versus 3494

2006-01-12 Thread Bruno Sugliani
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:55:30 -0600, Jim Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just thought I'd bring up a point people might overlook. When I first explored the subject, IBM's recommendation was not to put HSM migrated files into the VTS. The rationale says that on native drives, HSM retrievals are

Re: HSM - VTS Versus 3494

2006-01-12 Thread Bruce Black
When I got to my represent job, they indeed put HSM into the VTS. The VTS virtual drive is defined as a 3490E. The effect of this is when there is a HSM recall, the entire contents of the IBM 3490E is transferred back to the VTS disk before the recalled file within the HSM file can be

Re: Deleting a Catlog entry aka DSN not on Voluem

2006-01-12 Thread Bruce Black
DELETE dsn NOSCRATCH -- Bruce A. Black Senior Software Developer for FDR Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300 personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED] sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED] tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com

Fwd: Deleting a Catlog entry aka DSN not on Voluem

2006-01-12 Thread Howard Rifkind
Sorry but I forgot to mention the volume the dataset is on is an SMS managed dataset and the dataset name was OMVS.IBM. Thanks - Yahoo! Photos Got holiday prints? See all the ways to get quality prints in your hands ASAP.

Another Bank Loses Tape

2006-01-12 Thread Ed Gould
* Bank Tape Lost With Data On 90,000 Customers http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/241282/248833/5841/0/ -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET

Fw: Deleting a Catlog entry aka DSN not on Voluem

2006-01-12 Thread Mark Thomen
Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sorry but I forgot to mention the volume the dataset is on is an SMS managed dataset and the dataset name was OMVS.IBM. It's not clear what your problem is. When you do ISPF 3.4 does the data set name show up as

NFS documentation

2006-01-12 Thread Lester, Bob
Hi Folks, Can anyone out there give me a pointer to RECENT NFS manuals/redbooks/etc. We're on z/OS 1.4 and my manuals seem to be from 1.2 - and they seem to be the latest. We're running the NFS Server to mount mainframe files on unix. I'm looking for recommended PTF levels,

Re: USS Virus Scanner

2006-01-12 Thread A. Harry Williams
On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:22:06 -0500 PERRY MAYES said: We are in the process of setting up a SendMail SMTP server under z/OS 1.6 USS. Are there any virus scanning solutions that will run in the USS environment? It hasn't been ported to z/OS that I'm aware, but you could try porting ClamAV.

Re: HSM - VTS Versus 3494

2006-01-12 Thread R.S.
HSM works faster with physical (*modern* !!!) drives for output processing. This is because tapes are faster than VTS disks. HSM reading tapes is another animal. 1. It strongly depends on your activity. Probably usually you restore/recall single datasets, usually these datasets are small when

Re: RSM tuning

2006-01-12 Thread Ed Gould
On Jan 12, 2006, at 9:46 AM, Frank Yaeger wrote: John McKown on 01/11/2006 11:23:50 AM: DB2 absolutely requires DFSORT for some of its internal functions. Syncsort is documented to not work with DB2. DB2 comes with a subset license for this purpose. I.e. you don't have a general DFSORT

IBM bundling ...

2006-01-12 Thread Shane Ginnane
DB2 absolutely requires DFSORT for some of its internal functions. Syncsort is documented to not work with DB2. DB2 comes with a subset license for this purpose. I.e. you don't have a general DFSORT license. See the following Informational APAR for more information on this:

Re: CICS installation tape to file

2006-01-12 Thread Ed Gould
On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc wrote: Get rid of tapes and use ShopzSeries to order/download the files into a USS path(zFS or HFS) and the run GIMUNZIP. Roland Roland, Good suggestion but IMO not always a viable option. Not all companies have an

Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread Joel C. Ewing
But it does mean that a Syncsort shop that is heavy DB2 will now have the overhead of having two sort products loaded into LPA. I sure hope DFSORT doesn't have any LPA code that is RMODE24! The only rationale I can see for DB2 taking this approach would be a desire to market DB2 to shops

Re: Fw: Deleting a Catlog entry aka DSN not on Voluem

2006-01-12 Thread Tom Brannon
Could you possibly need Delete dsn VVR? Tom Mark Thomen wrote: Howard Rifkind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Sorry but I forgot to mention the volume the dataset is on is an SMS managed dataset and the dataset name was OMVS.IBM. It's not clear what your

Re: DB2 v8 cannot use Syncsort (was: RE: RSM tuning)

2006-01-12 Thread Todd Burch
Joel, I can see another reason, having worked in this field a bit. It appears to me that DB2 Utilities have leveraged another interface out of DFSORT to cut down on the overhead of sorting. Perhaps they are making block calls (calling DFSORT with a number of records) instead of calling DFSORT

Re: TIMEMARK and JWT question

2006-01-12 Thread John S. Giltner, Jr.
Forgot all about that. Since we use NetView Access, I can't remember the last time I logged directly on to TSO. Thomas H Puddicombe wrote: Unfortunately, in order to reconnect to an existing TSO session, you need to arrive with the same VTAM LUNAME as before - which is unlikely with TCP/IP.

DFSORT performance data

2006-01-12 Thread Khu Yi Ming
I would like to tell how much virtual/central storage is being used by sort jobs. The tuning guide (SC26-7526) states that JES log messages and SMF type-30 fields can be misleading as to how much storage DFSORT actually uses. Messages produced when a SORTDIAG DD statment is added, although looks

Re: z/OS 1.6 JES2 NJE link

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Mason
Roger, I have to apologise for my last post. I became so mesmerised by your attempts to use SNI definitions to deal with your requirement for NJE that I completely overlooked the obvious solution. Since the problem is you have two NetIDs why not just make it all one NetID. It is very likely that

Re: z/OS 1.6 JES2 NJE link

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Mason
A general point about SNA sense codes: Once you look up the supposed explanation for SNA sense codes you may have more questions than you started with. Nevertheless, if you are sensible enough to look up the explanation in the manual corresponding to the product which issued the message containing

Re: z/OS 1.6 JES2 NJE link

2006-01-12 Thread Chris Mason
Shmuel, The different NetID problem can be expressed in these terms: With subarea SNA, between subarea nodes, you can have network boundaries only INSIDE an NCP. This clearly excludes VTAM to VTAM SNI over a channel. With LEN and APPN the network boundary can be on the link between nodes. If the

Re: DFSMShsm 3592 carts money

2006-01-12 Thread Joel C. Ewing
An interesting difference in philosophy. We use HSM less for backups and more for space management. The backup capability sounded attractive initially, but we quickly found that with some application batch running almost 24x7 there were too many cases where the timing of autobackup and/or

z/OS 1.7 JES2 Exit migration info

2006-01-12 Thread Tim Schnorr
Was doing some poking around and found this information on updating JES2 EXITs for JES2 z/OS 1.7: http://www.newhasp.com/J2migration_guide.pdf. Looked interesting. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: how to allow separator pages, job by job?

2006-01-12 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KRDO 4)
The JES exits are system wide, PSF exits could be different for different printers. Printing of separators can be turned on and off per printer. You could change your separator exits (either JES and/or PSF) to look for specific data in one of the fields passed to them. The OUTPUT statment offers