Hi listners,
In our shop we have insatlled intertest,previously there was xpeditor.
In the Intertest how to put global break points. ie what i asm asking is when
i process some claims in one region it will trigger some other program in
another region. I need to trap these programs and de
I seems to me you want to replace the &-strings in the JCL, so
the & shall not denote a variable dereference.
No being a fluent edit macro writer I suggest you try to set the
scan mode off before the change:
ADDRESS ISREDIT "(oldscan) = SCAN"
ADDRESS ISREDIT "SCAN = OFF"
ADDRESS ISREDIT "CHG '&&
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Now we only have the problems of the DUMP files in CLOSE PENDING STATUS.
The
solved problem was only today's problem, the CLOSE PENDING's one is much
older...
Did you check that type19 collection was turned off as suggested earlier
???.
Else I'd be suspecting a coding
>> Is there an **EASY** way to give IPCS an address and have it tell me:
>> (1) the storage key and (2) whether it is fetch protected?
>It is possible that IPCS won't know the storage key for some storage,
>mostly storage for which SDUMP couldn't/didn't collect that information. I
>think that DISP
> DAIRFAIL is a routine to produce a message from status data.
An alternative to calling DAIRFAIL after the fact is to code a
SVC99 RB extension like mentioned here:
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9903&L=ibm-main&P=R43588&I=1
Some WTOs will be printed in the job log with a IKJ message
pre
Chris,
I don't see that your posting made it to IBM-Main (where the original
thread was) so John, Sam, and Craig may not have seen your kudos. I'll
double-post this response to get it back there.
Yes, I know poor, benighted Bruce is beyond hope - trying to get rid of
NetView and all (Are my preju
Hello Victor,
Have you checked your SMF TYPE 19 collection as per Shane and Sam's posts?
Check out Info APAR:
APAR Identifier .. II02887 Last Changed 02/08/26
SMF SWITCH COMMAND DOES NOT COMPLETE IN A TIMELY MANNER OR
IPL DOES NOT COMPLETE IN TIMELY MANNER - WAITING ON SH
Please. *NEVER EVER* APPLY (with or without CHECK) using BYPASS(HOLDERROR)
unless you are EXPLICITLY instructed to do so by a Level 2 or 3 support
person. If hold errors can be resolved in the current APPLY job, then they
will be resolved by fixing PTFs. Otherwise let PE PTFs fail. They will not
hu
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:05:37 -0800, Ale Eba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. REVEIVEd with HOLDDATA (downloaded from Enhnaced HOLDDATA).
> 2. Apply check with bypass(holdsys,holderror(xxx, xxx) where
> xxx is form example DK07323 ( APAR PK07323). I checked PK07323 which
>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:59:17 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did I hear (read) my name??
>
IIRC, it was you who, a while back, advocated balancing SYSCALLS( ON )
with SYSCALLS( OFF ). Here, SAVE/RESTORE might be useful because
there is no way of querying the state of SYSCALLS
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Rob Scott said:
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:27:42 -0500
"Note: once you execute "address ISREDIT", there is no need to put
"ISREDIT" in front of every command."
Maybe not - but I think it is good practice - it protects you from
problems if you
This question straddles the RACF/FTP boundary so I thought I would post it
here where the traffic is greatest.
Can anyone offer any clues or examples for setting up FTP so that it will
accept a PassTicket as an alternative to the password?
Yes, I've read http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0112
Hello everyone,
I am installing an ESO tape. I encountered few problems and need help.
1. REVEIVEd with HOLDDATA (downloaded from Enhnaced HOLDDATA).
2. Apply check with bypass(holdsys,holderror(xxx, xxx) where
xxx is form example DK07323 ( APAR PK07323). I checked
Try //STEPX.SUBSYSA DD DDNAME=?,SUBSYS= without the subsys parms.
On 1/17/06, Farley, Peter x23353 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Environment is z/OS 1.6. The Fine Manual specifically says that SUBSYS=?
> Overrides DDNAME=?, but makes no mention of whether DDNAME=? overrides
> SUBSYS=?. Also no me
In a recent note, Rob Scott said:
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:27:42 -0500
>
> "Note: once you execute "address ISREDIT", there is no need to put
> "ISREDIT" in front of every command."
>
> Maybe not - but I think it is good practice - it protects you from
> problems if you happen to ADDR
> With ample dynamic PAV, there should be no measurable performance
differences. Without ample PAV, then it depends. 'Ample' PAV means a
zero IO queue depth.
> You don't change a base volume to a PAV volume. PAV is simply another
logical path to a volume. The application hasn't a clue. You de
Peter,
BLSR is a critter (a good one!). I do not think that you can override a PROC's
DD statements to disable BLSR. You need to change and rip it out, go back to a
non-BLSR JCL.
I'm not sure, if you're familiar with BLSR, but this thing uses some trickery.
For example, here's some JCL I've been p
Certainly it only makes sense to code one or the other. Doing both is belt
and suspenders, which is perhaps a good thing with pants, but just adds
maintenance-obscuring noise to source code.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behal
>
> Now we only have the problems of the DUMP files in CLOSE PENDING STATUS.
The
> solved problem was only today's problem, the CLOSE PENDING's one is much
> older...
Did you check that type19 collection was turned off as suggested earlier
???.
Else I'd be suspecting a coding bug - look for LOGREC
Environment is z/OS 1.6. The Fine Manual specifically says that SUBSYS=?
Overrides DDNAME=?, but makes no mention of whether DDNAME=? overrides
SUBSYS=?. Also no mention for DSN=?.
Situation is, I have a PROC with DD statements containing only SUBSYS=?
Parameter, and I need to override these wit
>but I think it is good practice - it protects you from
problems if you happen to ADDRESS another environment when you next
change the REXX exec. Admittedly this might not be a big issue with
simple edit macros - but in larger REXX execs you can easily shoot
yourself in the foot.
I disagree.
I usu
Our V2X2 has fast response time (0.2ms - 8ms) but no PAV. Fully
loaded packs become sluggish under heavy i/o. I wish we had the V2Xf
with PAV.
SteveBui
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Tuesday, Jan
Seymour,
"Note: once you execute "address ISREDIT", there is no need to put
"ISREDIT" in front of every command."
Maybe not - but I think it is good practice - it protects you from
problems if you happen to ADDRESS another environment when you next
change the REXX exec. Admittedly this might not
We are quite happy with the Shark. But if STK has a more cost effective
mouse trap, then it makes business sense to take a look. After all, we
have to offer a suite of services at prices that make better business
sense to our customers than the competition's offerings. And that's a
moving target be
Hal,
StorageTek? You mean SUN don't you?
If you have a preference for SUN DASD, then they have a line of storage that
I unreservedly recommend over what once was the StorageTek V Series. (GD&R)
If you're replacing PPRC-XD then you must be considering Snap to Primary,
which is more like Nanocopy
On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:11:57 -0500, Craig Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>...
>NetView uses MVS RESMGR macro to dynamically define BNJMTERM
>memory-termination module rather than adding it to IEAVTRML.
>... . Therefore the ZAP to IEAVTRML is no longer
>needed.
>...
A couple of side issues.
Tha
The Shark (2105-800) can be setup with the Array's Across Loops (AAL)
feature. This is something you want to mention to your CE or the
specialist helping you provision the storage processor. This is
disruptive to customer data so you won't want to find out that you did
not provision the array's
My question is: if you are happy with Shark why are you looking to switch.
If it is just financial you should be able to leverage the discussions that
you are having with Storage Tek in your negotiations with IBM.
Joel Wolpert
Director - Performance and Capacity Planning
Shared Data Center
Securit
This is definitely the problem. You might have been at the edge of 1
dataset and now your SMF is on two datasets. As a general rule the use of
prm=smfdump should have DISP=MOD. Fix this and get on with your life. Don't
worry about why this just started to happen because the disp was wrong to
begin
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/17/2006
at 09:08 AM, Clark Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Listed below is a question we emailed to many of our customers and
>readers last week. We also thought it might be a good discussion
>item for this forum. You may send comments to us using the address
>s
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/16/2006
at 05:20 PM, "Stephen M. Wiegand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>OK I admit I'm old and my brain sometimes goes out to lunch. Today
>is one of those times. I have this error in a REXX macro that I use
>in TSO that I just can't figure out how to correct.
Wh
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/17/2006
at 09:48 AM, Brian Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
>In this context, I believe that the "in-use" and "not-in-use"
>references are referring to allocations which have been marked
>"not-in-use" using the DAIR interface.
Not on any current system. DAIR ju
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 01/16/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>REXX does not do variable substitution with '&'.
But ISPF does.
>"CHG" "'"HILVL".""ZZ.ZZ."P||STKO"."PARMLIB'" ...etc
That will only work if those are REXX variables. Otherwise he needs a
VGET to do it.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/17/2006
at 08:04 AM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I don't understand how these pieces fit together. Is DAIRFAIL a sort
>of reporting component,
No. DAIRFAIL is a routine to produce a message from status data.
>analogous to SYNADAF?
It's analogous
I have been investigating where some lost SMF data went. We have been
intermittently losing SMF records since our first IPL after increasing the
amount of memory on our z/OS 1.4 system to more than 2GiB. I *think* the issue
is the one referenced in II10956:
If SMFDUMP dumps 2 MAN datasets, w
It would not make sense. This would be legal and sales people writing
technical specifications to implement a marketing strategy in hardware
;-)
Funny how such a simple question* can confuse us tech folks.
* "What is a TSO user?"
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Jan 17, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Hal Merritt wrote:
Point is that it does. More, it makes its decisions pragmatically
based
on the reality at that point in time.
No such process can get it 100% right %100 of the time. But it should
consistently do it far better than a human after the fact. For o
We are looking at the StorageTek 'V series' DASD as a possible upgrade
path, We are currently one local and one remote 2105-800 Shark
interconnected with PPRC XD. We are heavy PAV and some Flashcopy II. The
other site is currently inactive (BR only), but our strategic direction
is twin sites, each
Thank you, nice thing
I really didn't know it was in System/360 when 8bit were first used for byte
On 1/17/06, John P Kalinich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> A very interesting Brooks OS/360 presentation.
>
> http://www.sdm.de/download/sdm-konf2001/d_4_brooks.pdf
>
>
-
For a sort to make predictive assignments of resources you would need a
function like Global DSM such as Syncsort has. They have had that
capability for over 15 years. It considers what is going on right now
and what has gone on in the past during the time it expects the sort be
running. This ma
Paul Gilmartin wrote on 01/17/2006 12:29:07 PM:
> In a recent note, Robert Wright said:
>
> > it can by-pass catalog lookup if the requestor uses a combination of
> > DYNALLOC keys implying acceptance of ddname reuse. You'll find a list
of
> > keys that prevent such ddname reuse as part of DYNALL
>Now you are saying that the maximum could apply to any invocation of TSO
services be it online interactive or batch??
That doesn't make much sense to me.
I have never seen it documented that way.
-teD
Me? A skeptic? I trust you have proof!
"Walt Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On 1/17/2006 10:31 AM, Vic Petrone wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your reply. I did not think of that problem. Do you know if
there
> > is a way to have the IRB create a PRB that would run after any SVRB has
> > completed?
Point is that it does. More, it makes its decisions pragmatically based
on the reality at that point in time.
No such process can get it 100% right %100 of the time. But it should
consistently do it far better than a human after the fact. For one
thing, it is difficult for a human to weigh all o
In a recent note, Robert Wright said:
> Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:23:34 -0500
>
> Brian Peterson wrote on 01/17/2006 10:48:40 AM:
>
> > The two concepts - 1) marking an allocation "not in use" and reusing a
> "not
> > in use" allocation, and 2) using the REUSE keyword on the ALLOC comman
On 1/17/2006 7:59 AM, Seremis wrote:
Thanks a lot to Walt and Willy for your suggestions! It's only today
that I can return to the subject, please excuse the delay.
To call an appropriate REXX exec to check dataset information rather
than invoking LIST-CAT via ISPF-SELECT would doubtlessly solve
Passing along a question from one of our readers
Have you heard anything regarding sites running MIDAW on non-IBM storage
devices? Do you know if MIDAW is for DASD only or both tape and DASD?
I have seen no announcements from other vendors about MIDAW support. Has
anyone else?
Clark
On 1/17/2006 10:53 AM, Vic Petrone wrote:
Hi Walt,
And since I mentioned security, Vic: How do you know that the user ID
associated with the address space where you're planning to run that
SRB/IRB will have the authority to OPEN the data set you want to process?
You're right about the aut
On 1/17/2006 10:31 AM, Vic Petrone wrote:
Thanks for your reply. I did not think of that problem. Do you know if there
is a way to have the IRB create a PRB that would run after any SVRB has
completed? The assumption is that an SVRB performs an OPEN or RACF service
and once the SVRB completes,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Lots of our programs call a CoBOL program designed to handle VSAM
> files. Trouble is, when the VSAM return code doesn't start with '0',
> it returns its own error message.That works, except IBM also has
> the successful return code of '97'.
>
> Anybody know why I
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 08:29 -0800, Mark Thomen wrote:
> It would be good if someone would submit a requirement asking that all
> messages be put into the appropriate message manuals (hint, hint).
Including COBOL compiler messages?
/me ducks, runs!
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL
I had heretofore thought that the TSO maximum was controlled by the
USERMAX parameter, and that was interactive TSO sessions with a human at
a keyboard. Nothing was ever said in any IBM doc that would lead me to
believe otherwise.
Now you are saying that the maximum could apply to any invocation
ENTERPRISE
1. zSeries: Big Plans Ahead?
What can we expect from IBM's zSeries team over the next
twelve months? If history is any indication, quite a bit.
From an affordable entry in the new System z9 line to a
more affordable way to host COBOL apps on z/OS, 2006 has
the potential to be a banner
On Jan 17, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote:
"Víctor de la Fuente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
Our problem is also SMF starts losing data before all files are full:
IEE979W SMF DATA LOST - NO BUFFER SPACE AVAILABLE TIME=08:19:30
..
D SMF
IEE97
"Mike Hawkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> We are unable to locate the following message, any help would really be
> appreciated.
>
> DGTLM003 RTC=30 RSN=62 MOD=F8
>
I'm not sure why my earlier reply wasn't posted. This is a Catalog error
message, so look fo
Brian Peterson wrote on 01/17/2006 10:48:40 AM:
> In this context, I believe that the "in-use" and "not-in-use" references
> are referring to allocations which have been marked "not-in-use" using
the
> DAIR interface. This interface is documented in TSO/E Programming
Services
> topic 17.2.2.11 M
Yes. However, we use a /*JOBPARM S=xxx instead. I think that construct
was easier to implement under our job scheduler.
One task for the scheduler is to 'wind down' for an IPL. That is, to
insure long running jobs that will not complete are not submitted until
after the IPL.
Interestingly, the
There are historical reasons why the situation reported by "97" couldn't
start with a "0". HOWEVER, if this is of importance to you, then submit a
"request" via your IBM marketing team and reference the existing SHARE
requirement:
SSLNGC0413615 Optional (ISO 2002) "0x" file-status code for curr
At 05:44 PM 01/16/2006, Rob Scott wrote:
Steve,
First of all, I advise that you standardize on the way that you use your
quotes. I always use double quotes for the buffer that I am passing to
my ADDRESS environment (if possible) and I always include them rather
than relying on REXX to init a va
At 11:22 PM 01/16/2006, Dave Salt wrote:
From: "Stephen M. Wiegand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I am always getting the string not found message. The return code is a 4.
Any help/suggestions would be appreciated.
Hi Steve,
Others have mentioned the use of ampersands versus leaving variables
outside
In this context, I believe that the "in-use" and "not-in-use" references
are referring to allocations which have been marked "not-in-use" using the
DAIR interface. This interface is documented in TSO/E Programming Services
topic 17.2.2.11 Marking Data Sets as Not in Use (Entry Code X'2C').
Basic
Hello John,
I have worked with the OSA cards since the OSA-1 to the latest OSA-E 10Gb, i
have set some recovery scenarios that made a very easy way to set the cards
fot take over:
1) VIPA (with or without OSPF or RIP) if you configure a VIPA in your
environment all the Physicall interafces will b
Good idea.
In my defense, here's why I used ASASYMBM:
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0504&L=ibm-main&P=R55202&I=3&m=224194
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Edward E. Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 5:36 AM
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:24:38 -0500
>
> >Look, guys, the silicon has already identified the conflicting keys.
>
> You're looking at the wrong side of the interface. DAIRFAIL does not
> have access to the relevant data. In order to pr
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:54:15 -0500, "pdc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IOEZ00248E VSAM linear dataset Dataset successfully created
>Severity: svc_c_sev_error Explanation: The dataset was successfully created.
Lots of our programs call a CoBOL program designed to handle VSAM
files. Trouble is,
Thanks John, yes it does have a an Aix, I'll check it out, seems a likely
explanation.
Cheers
GA
"Chase, John"
1) Do you ignore SRB CPU time and not charge for it as part of your
accounting algorithm? NOif you are a DB2 shop, most of your time is
here. These enclaves are becommig more and more useful for tracking usage.
2) Do you charge for SRB CPU time, but use a different rate than for TCB CPU
t
Charging for SRB time is something like shipping and handling. I'll charge
you always for shipping (TCB) and you'll also get the handling charge (SRB)
which are always combined and never separated.
Rich
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
B
>1) Do you ignore SRB CPU time and not charge for it as part of your
accounting algorithm?
>2) Do you charge for SRB CPU time, but use a different rate than for TCB CPU
time?
Whenever I have been asked for input on this, I have always recommended against
charging for SRB.
It's not repeatable fo
On 1/17/2006 6:32 AM, Walt Farrell wrote:
On 1/16/2006 5:53 PM, Vic Petrone wrote:
I have an SRB that needs to dynamically allocate a dataset and then
OPEN, BSAM READ, and CLOSE the dataset. I'm considering having the SRB
schedule an IRB for these tasks. I'm assuming that the IRB can since I
c
Listed below is a question we emailed to many of our customers and readers
last week. We also thought it might be a good discussion item for this forum.
You may send comments to us using the address shown below, or it may be better
to just reply to the list.
--
For many years the MVS
Yes, it is. We're doing it for years.
gerrit van Arnhem.
Lucas Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Verzonden door: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
17-01-2006 14:44
Antwoord a.u.b. aan
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Aan
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Cc
Onderwerp
SMSPLEX shared Between Sysplexes
Is it pos
Is it possible to share SMS definitions and resources between two Sysplexes?.
Thanks.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
Charles Mills wrote:
[snip]
* USE ASASYMBM TO RETRIEVE &SYSNAME
Why? What's wrong with CVTSNAME?
--
-
| Edward E. Jaffe||
| Mgr, Research & Development| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A very interesting Brooks OS/360 presentation.
http://www.sdm.de/download/sdm-konf2001/d_4_brooks.pdf
David Alcock
APAR II11247 from 1998 says:
---
This is an informational apar to list Tivoli
NetView for OS/390 V1R2 common non-defect problems
---
Problem: Where is Step 9 in the Install and Admin guide which
requir
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gerry Anstey
>
> Anyone any ideas about this:
>
> We have a VSAM KSDS defined to COBOL as VARYING from 586 to
> 2500. The file is updated by writing new records or rewriting
> old ones. We occasionally get a File st
Thanks for the link! It'll be my most visited page!!!
XD
2006/1/17, Knutson, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> IIRC = If I Recall Correctly
>
> You can lookup acronym's here http://www.acronymfinder.com/
>
> Thanks, Sam
>
> -Original Message-
> P.D.: I'm not a good English speaker. What does I
IIRC = If I Recall Correctly
You can lookup acronym's here http://www.acronymfinder.com/
Thanks, Sam
-Original Message-
P.D.: I'm not a good English speaker. What does IIRC means??? (" IIRC
this can still cause delays switching ...")
<>
This email/fax message is fo
OK! Thanks all!
One of the problems is gone.
We found some DASD problem, we solved them and...voilà!
Now we only have the problems of the DUMP files in CLOSE PENDING STATUS. The
solved problem was only today's problem, the CLOSE PENDING's one is much
older...
Who is the responsible for changing
Anyone any ideas about this:
We have a VSAM KSDS defined to COBOL as VARYING from 586 to 2500. The file
is updated by writing new records or rewriting old ones. We occasionally
get a File status 44 when Writing a new record We have checked the record
length and confirm that it is 586, we also use
On 1/16/2006 5:53 PM, Vic Petrone wrote:
I have an SRB that needs to dynamically allocate a dataset and then OPEN,
BSAM READ, and CLOSE the dataset. I'm considering having the SRB schedule an
IRB for these tasks. I'm assuming that the IRB can since I can't find any
documentation to the contrary
--- "John S. Giltner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> SYSAFF card in the JCL with system id of the system you want > to
run it on. At least with JES2 this works.
John,
thanks, you're right. Seems like SCHENV on the jobcard, or even
centrally in the JES2 JOBCLASS(x) statement can do the trick.
Victor,
for z/OS 1.4 there is an USERMOD to zap the values. Check IBM.
To see who is filling SMF, check the records that have been recorded and later
written. The offender will probably have produced the most of the written
records before causing problems.
I cannot help you with the other prob
This may have been sent already. I'm having some local problem with my mail
service.
John,
Documentation:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg245948.html?Open
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IOA2Z120/CCONTENTS?SHELF=IOA2BK50&DN=SA22-7935-05&DT=20050916101710
As for
John,
Documentation:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg245948.html?Open
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IOA2Z120/CCONTENTS?SHELF=IOA2BK50&DN=SA22-7935-05&DT=20050916101710
As for "What causes one OSA to "take over" for a second OSA?", both manuals
simply say "an O
John,
At first I thought this was a response to an existing thread and then I
discovered it wasn't since it's the wrong newsgroup. Last week, this topic
arose on the IBMTCP-L newsgroup under "OSA ARP Takeover - experiences".
You'll find most of what you want there and you might like to add your po
Then I have another problem...we use z/OS 1.4!
Nevertheless, we already thought about the problem you said. But our system
is about 80% CPU, and we are used to be in 100%. I know there is no
implication with cpu and smf writing, but I can suppose we had more smf
writing per second a lot of times. T
"Víctor de la Fuente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>...
> Our problem is also SMF starts losing data before all files are full:
>
> IEE979W SMF DATA LOST - NO BUFFER SPACE AVAILABLE TIME=08:19:30
> ..
> D SMF
> IEE974I 08.20.04 SMF DATA SETS 177
> NAME
89 matches
Mail list logo
