Have you checked DCBOFLGS? If the DCB is not marked as OPEN, it may
be unreasonable to expect CLOSE to do anything for you. This would account
for why you see the same whether you issue the CLOSE or not.
You may be expected to clean up your own DCB in an ABEND scenario. Have
you checked that
snip
I'm obliged to do some fancy copy and paste here. Is there a technique
for
replying to a non-e-mail post with an e-mail?
That may depend on your news reader. I'm using Forte Agent; *all* of my
posts are e-mail responses to the newsgroup postings. Agent makes that
trivially easy.
I am
Can someone please tell me what BMC product this belongs to?
It shows up in a dump as being loaded into ECSA many, many
times, possibly contributing to an LX shortage.
I have never heard of it, but I will see who it belongs to and let you
know. While it should not be loaded many
unreasonable to expect CLOSE to do anything for you
I hear you. I suspected as much already. OTOH, the DFSMS manual says what it
says below about CLOSE unconditionally; it doesn't say if DCBOFLGS is on.
Have you checked...
Yes, it works correctly in all other cases that I have tested.
you
Charles Mills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I open a QSAM input DCB with zero RECFM, LRECL, and BLKSIZE whose DD is a
JCL-allocated dataset. The dataset is a PDS which exists, but the member
specified in the JCL does not exist. I get an S013-18 on the OPEN as I
Thanks.
I always do an Ignore (MVI 3(R1),4) and branch to the address passed in R14.
I do the Ignore without checking whether it is an allowed option (it is in
this case) on the theory that if it's not, what am I going to do? - Tell
QSAM to proceed with the ABEND, which is what QSAM does anyway
as400 wrote:
I went to my local DMV office and I saw the black screen with the green
text that said DMV AUTOMATION...on a TN3270 (i think) screen...
Are those terminals accessed via a Mainframe or an RS/6000?
I saw alot of them on the teller's screens...It seemd to me as they
were the TN3270
Can I ask of how many people are stilling using BTAM and will expect it to
still run under 1.7?
Rich Lopez
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ed Rabara
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 6:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
as400 wrote:
No and NO nO nO NO PLEASE UNDERSTAND HERE...
I am not intended to do any harm here..Im just interested in the
legacy systems that Governments use like the Mainframes...I want to
learn more about them. Hope this helps to clear anyt negative concerns.
I know and I am aware that
Does any remember DRMS? or use it.
A requesting jobstep puts a filename into a queue, then ends immediately.
The master part of DRMS runs periodically to backup all of the data, and
vault the tapes.
I am looking for a replacement method of backing up data without
elongating the jobstep.
What
John,
This puts me in mind of simpler times, let's say the early '70s. In those
days, you could tell which manufacturer was responsible for the utility bill
printing mainframe. These were the days of Snowwhite and the Seven Dwarfs
but, in the UK, utility companies were divided between IBM and
11 matches
Mail list logo
