>Um, MAXPROCUSER?
Yes, MAXPROCUSER limits the number of concurrent processes per
user, MAXPROCSYS sets the systemwide limit.
Don't increase MAXPROCUSER to an unreasonable value just because
one server needs a large nummber of processes. Use the PROCUSERMAX
attribute in that userid's OMVS segment.
IKJEFT1A does return after the first non-zero return code
even if the input comes from a data set executed via "ex"
command. Either the "SYSTSIN DD *" or the "PARM=" version
work for me.
Or did I missunderstand you question?
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
Hello,
I am trying to use the LOAD from CD-ROM option on the HMC. I do a Single
object and then CPC recovery. I click on LOAD from CD-ROM option and click
the LPAR . From the LOAD from CDROM or Server Windows shows the HMC CD-ROM
and LOAD CDROM options have been grayed out. It is not selecta
In a message dated 3/16/2006 3:55:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
still have to figure out how to stop this message that keeps appearing in
SYSLOG ...
>>
MPF maybe???
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Bill,
This is the old "How does LOAD differ from LOAD ADDRESS?" issue - as has
already comprehensively been pointed out.
You may like to know there is a list/group oriented to Assembler which can
be accessed as follows:
SUBSCRIBING TO ASSEMBLER-LIST:
To subscribe to ASSEMBLER-LIST, send an ema
Run the NTP server on the parallel sysplex and have the other platforms
use it as the time source.
Jerry Whitteridge
Safeway Inc
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Giovanni Cerquone
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:17
>> t h e s p i r i t s a r e a b o u t t o s p
>> e a k !
Are they friendly spirits?
Frendly?
Just listen!
Fan mail from some flounder?
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
To what level of precision is synchronization required?
To a 0.1 / second?
To a 0.01 / second?
To a 0.001 / second?
If the first, or perhaps the second, if all servers sync to NIST in Boulder
CO, then they'll all be the same. "NTP synchronization" amongst all the
platforms you cite will effect
Dear folks;
We have a necessity to synchronize our IBM Parallel Sysplex with other
platforms, i.e. HP Non Stop, Sun, PSeries, etc. I'm aware that PS does not
support NTP.
I was thinking if with STP we can achieve this but with the information I
have, I think the answer seems to be a big NO.
Any
84 99 96 93 93 5A
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 03/16/2006
05:53:26 PM:
> E a n y - m e a n y ' c h i l i - b e a n y '
> 45 61 6E 79 2D 6D 65 61 6E 79 2C 20 63 68 69 6C 69 2D 62 65 61 6E 79 2C
20
> t h e s p i r i t s a r e a b o u
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:53:46 -0500, Richard Tsujimoto
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Doc said:
>>I've yet to see a mainframe to client-server transition that didn't end
>in
>>tears, higher costs, lowered service levels, gnashing of teeth, roaming
>>gangs of SysProgs threatening passers by in Hex, lar
We often see such corporate exclamations of intention, but is there any
organization that keeps track of successes and failures and will make these
results public?
Those statistics, company names and general environments attempted would be
interesting and perhaps useful for arguing against further
Somebody at LRS tells me their product-in-development (expected to be
available early next year, on Windoz/Unixes/Linuxes) should be just about
what we are looking for -- and able to convert our existing PageCenter
inventory of reports.
So my boss says "Let's wait".
Thanks to all who replied.
I am currently in the process of switching from CA-Opera to CA-OPS/MVS.
We are currently in the process of bringing in CA to help us convert . I
was just trying to get a jump on things. I am having trouble trying to
determine what to use within an ALERT process to communicate with CA-7.
The one thi
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:19:34 +1000, Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Sorry, but every time I hear FLEX I think "laptop with dongle".
>I have this recurring image of the DR site being folded up and taken
>home to finish that Gantt chart or somesuch ...
>One day I guess I'll see one that isn't in
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 07:27:52 -0600, Scott Fagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Glen -
>
>First, to be really seen, your message needs to go to the list, not the
>newsgroup mirror, see http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html to get
>started.
>
>Second, although MSYS/OPS uses bits from various license
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 14:22 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
> I've shot myself in the foot only a few (3
> or 4) times but they were doozies.
*Everyone* who uses SMP to any degree has a war story. The situations
that degenerate into fiasco are generally exacerbated by attempts at
recovery.
With a
McKown, John wrote:
Not entirely. PWD people can get z/OS running 64-bit mode. Commercial
users are still limited to running z/OS in 31-bit mode. However, I think
that the newest instructions are available even in 31-bit mode.
In this context, "64-bit mode" is shorthand for z/Architecture i.
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 14:52 -0500, Jay Howard wrote:
> We are a small shop running a zSeries/890 (capacity 130) and management is
> looking at using a FLEX-ES system for disaster recovery purposes. Is there
> anyone that has or is doing this that would be willing to share their
> experiences? Yo
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:29:04 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>...
>>it's to everyone's benefit that the experienced SMP users lend them
>>a helping hand.
>
>At the outset. But if they ignore what the experienced SMP users told
>them then they should clean up their own mess.
>...
My origin
>z/Journal really is a good publication and it's FREE.
Only in the US.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 13:52 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
> The maximum per UID is set in BPXPRMxx
> member with the MAXPROCSYS() parameter.
Um, MAXPROCUSER?
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
For IBM
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:13 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: FLEX-ES
>
>
> Sure, if you pay the standard license fees for the z/OS
> base and any pr
Any UID can run concurrent processes. UID 0 unlimited number, others are
limited by MAXsomething in BPXPRMxx.
On 3/16/06, Steve Horein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello listers,
> While installing an upgrade to a product, the instructions indicate to
> assign UID(0) to an ID. The product in que
Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Jay Howard wrote:
We are a small shop running a zSeries/890 (capacity 130) and
management is looking at using a FLEX-ES system for disaster recovery
purposes. Is there anyone that has or is doing this that would be
willing to share their experiences? You can reply direc
I may be wrong, but last time I heard, z/OS 64bit was not licensed/supported
(whatever legal words) besides development purposes.
On 3/16/06, Jay Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We are a small shop running a zSeries/890 (capacity 130) and management is
> looking at using a FLEX-ES system fo
Yes it does
some prior draw backs was it did not support ESCON which it does now
and even though it supported parallel channels, you could not connect them
to DASD controllers
I have only seen it used at one MVS location , but many VM, VSE shops due
to the fact IBM does not have a low mip solution
According to Gartner it does.
Jay Howard
"Edward E. Jaffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
03/16/2006 02:55 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: FLEX-ES
Jay Howard wrote:
> We are a small shop running
Jay Howard wrote:
We are a small shop running a zSeries/890 (capacity 130) and management is
looking at using a FLEX-ES system for disaster recovery purposes. Is there
anyone that has or is doing this that would be willing to share their
experiences? You can reply directly to me if you like.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Horein
> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 1:36 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: UID(0) and concurrent processes
>
>
> Hello listers,
> While installing an upgrade to a product,
We are a small shop running a zSeries/890 (capacity 130) and management is
looking at using a FLEX-ES system for disaster recovery purposes. Is there
anyone that has or is doing this that would be willing to share their
experiences? You can reply directly to me if you like.
Thank You,
Jay Howa
Hi,
z/Journal really is a good publication and it's FREE.
http://www.zjournal.com/
I took time this afternoon to read and recycle (pass to a college) the
current paper issue.
I always find a useful tidbit for dessert in addition to the meat &
potato's of the articles themselves.
This time th
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Hello listers,
While installing an upgrade to a product, the instructions indicate to
assign UID(0) to an ID. The product in question involves running a Java
server, and the webserver task supporting the Java server likewise has this
requirement. When questioning Support for the product, it was men
Bill,
ADR1 is based on some register and offset in your program. Let's pretend
it is R3, and is 4 bytes off of R3.
So, being that, the instructions looks like this:
L R10,4(,R3)
MVC ZON,0(R10)
By rewriting the instructions, you get this:
MVC ZON,4(R3)
Can you see the difference no
Bill wrote:
>Dear all
>(...)
>L 10,ADR1
>MVC ZON,0(10) ===> (XX)
>(..)
>ADR1 DS F
>===> why when i replace (XX) by "MVC ZON,ADR1" , i don't have the same
>value in ZON ???
Assume that the following:
Basereg = 12
Offset of ZON = X'444'
Offset of ADR1 = X'200'
Content of ADR1 = address of CL3
Bill,
break out your old Assembler 101 classroom handbook or the Assembler Language
manual and ask yourself the following question:
What does a "L" (Load) instruction do, as opposed to the "LA" (Load _Address_)
instruction?
Also please note that "MVC" moves (copies) storage from the _address_ poi
Bill Larsen wrote:
Dear all
(...)
L 10,ADR1
MVC ZON,0(10) ===> (XX)
(..)
ADR1 DS F
===> why when i replace (XX) by "MVC ZON,ADR1" , i don't have the same
value in ZON ???
Maybe because ADR1 should be an address constant?
Kind regards,
-Steve Comstock
---
The replacement instruction moves the ADDRESS into ZON, instead of the
contents at the ADDRESS as previously coded.
Rob Scott
Rocket Software
http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access i
What is the length of ZON?
Bill Larsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
COM>
Dear all
(...)
L 10,ADR1
MVC ZON,0(10) ===> (XX)
(..)
ADR1 DS F
===> why when i replace (XX) by "MVC ZON,ADR1" , i don't have the same
value in ZON ???
Thank you
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access inst
Bruce,
At Time splits with Shadowimage and/or TrueCopy use Timestamps to initiate
the split and create consistency. There is no blockade of writes for "a few
seconds" while all the volumes are split.
Ron
>
> With normal backups, and even with normal "instant replication", I/O
> consistency cann
Bruno,
Sorry mate, but with PPRC the Device End will come back to the Host whether
the write to the Site B Bay succeeds or fails. This means lost data, even
with PPRC Synchronous Remote Copy. Same is true for Synchronous Remote Copy
using SRDF and TrueCopy.
You have to be running PPRC with CRITIC
In a message dated 3/16/2006 10:30:30 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
cartridges are really 3590's. Heaven forbid that our systems side tell
the application side what the real story is. That is what I love about
working here. I get to run around and verify all kinds
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:18:03 -0400, Clark Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Given that the mainframe was running 2.10, I suspect that the
>applications running on it were ones that were less than optimal and
>this may have forced application consolidation and upgrade. Frankly I
>would like to
You should probably *not* use the DSN/VOL parameters for normal production
policies. By default the system will find and use the active CFRM couple
data set. But whenever you need to put a policy into *another* couple data
set, that's where the parameters come into play. You only need to put the
>This settings change will be memorized, but be sure to exit ISPF cleanly (don't
allow the session to timeout / get cancelled) so the change really is stored in
your ISPF profile dataset for the future.
Or: have a REXX EXEC (call it PROFSAVE):
/* REXX */
trace
address "ISPEXEC"
"VGET ZAPPLID"
"
I was under a misunderstanding. We code unit=3490 in our JCL, but the
cartridges are really 3590's. Heaven forbid that our systems side tell
the application side what the real story is. That is what I love about
working here. I get to run around and verify all kinds of things in
addition to doi
On 15 Mar 2006 16:36:34 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hmmm, another shop, 13 mips this time. When I see 15,000 mip shops migrating
>off the mainframe, I will be concerned.
>
>so, he got rid of one 2003-205 mainframe, replaced one 13 mip machine for 30
>servers, not to
Charlie,
to get your command line back to the top, do the following:
Go into SDSF, any panel
Type the word SETTINGS on the command line, press Enter.
This will bring up the IPSF Settings panel:
Log/List Function keys Colors Environ Workstation Identifier Help
¢
My "COMMAND INPUT ===>" dropped to the bottom of the screen in SDSF and
I don't know
why. My "Command line at bottom" in option 0 of ISPF is not selected
and all of my
ISPF panels have the command line at the top. What the heck did I do to
SDSF?
TIA, Charlie J
---
In a message dated 3/16/2006 6:43:14 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have verified that we have StorageTek 9840 drives. You have all given
me an answer that my boss can now work with. I will pass on the
information. Thanks to all who have responded. I have great
Speaking as someone at a shop with a 2086-240, I'm a little concerned *now*.
Jon
so let's see, 9672-RB5, a grand total of 89 mips. I'll start getting
concerned when I see 15,000 mip shops migrating off the mainframe.
--
Fo
we have 9490's they read 3490 and 3480 tapes.
you say your 9480 read 3490 tapes.
"Karson, Lynne (SAA)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
03/15/2006 03:30 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
9840 cart question
Doc said:
>I've yet to see a mainframe to client-server transition that didn't end
in
>tears, higher costs, lowered service levels, gnashing of teeth, roaming
>gangs of SysProgs threatening passers by in Hex, large cracks appearing
in
>the Earth's surface and all life in the Universe coming to a
Well, I'm confused. The manual (TSO/E User's Guide) does seem to be pretty
consistent in using the word "statement" to refer essentially to a line
(whether continued or not) of JCL - the EXEC statement, the JOB statement,
the SYSIN DD statement, the SYSTSIN DD statement etc. Are they not using
th
It can be downloaded here:
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/websphere/ws-soa7fnd2.html
?S_TACT=105AGX58&S_CMP=DNL&ca=dnl
I'm in the process of downloading it. It is a 19 minute long mp3 file,
about 17.6Mb (or Mib or?). There is an associated transcript available
for reading as well.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 03/15/2006
at 07:21 PM, Tom Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Why so?
Because the sentence as written is meaningless.
>The sentence references commands, subcommands and statements but NOT
>records.
Which is why it doesn't actually say anything.
>As stated it is c
Now the pieces make sense. I have made changes to our live CFRM policy for
so long I did not even know you could code the CFRM DSN in the IXCMIAPU
utility. I had always let it default in the past.
I imagine I must run it twice for the Primary/Alternate CFRM DSN.
Thanks you very much everyone fo
I have verified that we have StorageTek 9840 drives. You have all given
me an answer that my boss can now work with. I will pass on the
information. Thanks to all who have responded. I have great good fun
reading and passing on knowledge and articles from this forum even
though most of it is wa
Bill Westland wrote:
Last time I had this problem was on an OS/390 2.4 system. I found a CA product (CA-1 or CA-7) that had corrupted the initiators. I was able to FORCE the initiators and JES was able to restart the initiators (new ASID of course) and we ran throughout the week without any furt
Skip Robinson wrote:
I know the problem is solved now, but I remember a similarly mysterious
occurrence in the past. It was one of those 'this could not possibly be
happening' situations. Two systems in a shared DASD environment came to
point to two different devices with the same volser. It's
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P.S.:
You can also use the EX command in SYSTSIN to invoke your RACF command
file as a CLIST, instead of specifying it directly in the SYSTSIN DD
statement.
SYSTSIN DD *
EX 'DSN'
/*
Nice idea, but how do I get the same behavior as feeding the file into
program IKJEF
Last few days I used Info-ZIP quite a lot (z/OS 1.6 and 1.7). The problem I
have is that the blocksize of zipped files equals 80, so the zipped files
need a lot of space. E.g.
adding: 'N500223/D#060301/CHAN#IOQ/RMF#BC01.TXT' (in=5893937)
(out=523379) (deflated 91%)
total bytes=5893937,
<- snip ->
I have a full test this weekend, so hopefully will have some of this ironed
out. I am going with a newly formatted CFRM dataset and retaining all the
other COUPLE datasets.
If I use a new CFRM dataset, where is the CF policy information stored? I
was thinking it was stored in th
Darren wrote:
> That problem has been rectified.
Thank you, Darren.
Sam wrote:
> You can also search them through the Google Groups Archive
http://groups.google.com/groups?oi=djq&as_ugroup=bit.listserv.ibm-main
Thank you, Sam. Using the mailing list exclusively, I just forget the
possibility
66 matches
Mail list logo