NYC is a good bet for Wall Stree firms and banks using mainframes but the
mainframes sure aren't in NYC. Most have move and consolidated in various sub
of NYC, like NJ. Several have moved the physical operations overseas.
Rent is just to high in NYC to house computer rooms any longer.
Brian Westerman wrote:
... In this
case, it turned out to be that we were trying to take a DASD volume that
was built under a Hercules (MVS 3.8) system and after conversion and
transmitting, load and use it on a Z/OS system. Normally that is not a
problem, but (apparently) when you use
It is true that bit ETDEAM was defined in z/OS 1.5 but unfortunately it
appears that the function doesn't actually work until z/OS 1.8.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
===
-Original Message-
From: Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/22/2006 10:29 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Program Call (PC) routine in AMODE(64)
It is true that bit ETDEAM was defined in z/OS 1.5 but
I don't know anything about shadow volumes, but I bet that they need an
indexed vtoc. The MVS 3.8 vtoc wouldn't support an indexed vtoc. Maybe
that was the problem.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. z/OS Systems Programmer
Milwaukee Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: Edward Jaffe
Eric N. Bielefeld wrote:
I don't know anything about shadow volumes, but I bet that they need an
indexed vtoc. The MVS 3.8 vtoc wouldn't support an indexed vtoc. Maybe
that was the problem.
That's a bet you would lose. Any volume produced or usable under MVS 3.8
is fully functional under
6 matches
Mail list logo
