Hi,
I hav defined generic profile 'PROD.**' and USR1 has ALTER access to this
profile
Later I defined dataset proiled named 'PROD.BACKUP' and provided OPR1 and
OPR2 users READ access.
Is thr necessity of providing ALTER access to USR1 for this newly created
profile PROD.BACKUP ???
JAcky
-
It's in the Authorized Assembler Services Guide. Chapters 25 through 27
Cheers,
Ken Kornblum
Neon Enterprise Software
Austin, TX
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Smith
Sent: Saturday, September 30, 2006 9:11 PM
To: IBM-MA
In what IBM manual can I find documentation on SVC 99? It's not in any of the
places I thought to look. It's been a long time since I wrestled with the
documentation.
Gary L. Smith
Columbus, Ohio
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sig
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Brian Inglis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Had to be reduced to 9 pages (36KB) because the 3880/3380 would miss
> the start of the next track (RPS miss) on a chaine
SyncSort for z/OS R1.2 can be installed using SMP/E or not. Your choice.
SyncSort even provides an ISPF front-end to the installation process (which
I do not use, went straight to the manual SMP/E install). The SMP/E
process, as provided, will allow you to build a new SMP CSI for your
global, t
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ed Gould) writes:
> It would be interesting, I would think to have the "old timers"
> compare the code that was used in the "old days" against wh
Cross-posted from the Rexx list, where the response was underwhelming!
I have a compiled Rexx program that runs in MVS batch. It must be able to
run either with the "Rexx library" (that is, truly compiled) or with the
alternate library. It uses many home-grown assembler functions. I provide
the
> And so the entry of the ALIAS may be different from the entry of the
> module you specify on the NAME statement.
You're asking: can I create a load module named XXX in which EXEC PGM=XXX
starts execution at displacement 1000, and which also has an alias named
YYY, and EXEC PGM=YYY starts executi
In a recent note, Charles Mills said:
> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 16:18:06 -0700
>
> I believe I recall doing that also, although the timeframe would have been
> ~1970, back when I found it more amusing than I do today to play "what if?"
> in MVS (then OS/360).
>
Not so much such bravado as
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne & Lynn Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in the early 80s ... "big pages" were implemented for both VM and MVS.
> this didn't change the virtual page size .
If you can forsee a situation where you need more than 2Gb for your
temporary storage - then I would suggest converting now.
Otherwise consider the following :
(a) Are you experiencing performance problems now?
(b) Watch out for the frequency of the SAC instruction - this can slow
things down dr
I'm not sure, but I believe:
if you have no ENTRY control statement but you have an ALIAS control
statement, and there is a ENTRY or CSECT in the object module with the same
name, the ALIAS will get this entry. And so the entry of the ALIAS may be
different from the entry of the module you spec
I need to know how to get a new certificate in TCPIP for TN3270
connections.I create the new certificate and added the new certificate to
the keyring. However it appears that it is not being used. I am using RACF
to hold the certificate.
Thanks,
Jay
---
Hi
(Maybe already discussed)
Dataspace vs 64 bit performance.
Currently our application is using datasspaces to store large temporary
informations
(store sequential and retrive later sequential)
Is it worth to change to 64 bit ?
--
* Gibney, Dave wrote, On 30/09/2006 08:07:
keep an "up to date" set via Softcopy Librarian at work and on my
laptop. But, it's a little old, last new stuff is April 2006 :(
Mark Hammond wrote:
Thanks to all. One of my biggest frustrations is finding the right
manual to get the inform
keep an "up to date" set via Softcopy Librarian at work and on my
laptop. But, it's a little old, last new stuff is April 2006 :(
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gerhard Postpischil
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 2:
16 matches
Mail list logo