Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
Nowadays I run my own rexx code to take every member of non-loadlib PDSEs
and create a sequential dataset with an IEBUPDTE ./ ADD control card in front
of it. I then download in ASCII and I can open it with notepad. If I ftp it back
up, I can either run it through
Well, C on UNIX is really assembler - just one step removed from the bits and
bytes of the underlying CPU. Its designers realized that there is not much
benefit in writing CPU specific code to copy x bytes of memory to another
location over the generic a = b kind of code. Same for other basic
I looked for obits at _www.obituaries.com_ (http://www.obituaries.com) and
didn't get a single hit on Keohane. Guess I'd met him a couple of times at
SHARE, but it's been awhile. Then remembered his work at search390 now
searchdatacenter.com Anyway, names to faces might jog some memories
In a message dated 5/26/2007 11:36:27 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
searchdatacenter.com Anyway, names to faces might jog some memories and if
so inclined
can sign up for areas of interest at searchdatacenter.com
Don't hate it when you forget to paste??
In a message dated 5/26/2007 11:55:37 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Forgive me... I guess I've missed something .. I know Jim ..
Obituaries ??. what happened ?.
Sorry, it was posted on IBM-Main yesterday by Bob Richards. His wife Rae
sent a note to several of
On Sat, 26 May 2007 10:49:05 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
of it. I then download in ASCII and I can open it with notepad. If I ftp it
back
That's great if it works for you, but under most conditions the
ASCII-EBCDIC translation is lossy, and fails to preserve all
In a message dated 5/25/2007 9:27:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bblack (I think):
That There is no easy way that I know to determine if the current
step is the last step that uses the dataset claim conflicts with
your then releases the dataset at the end of
On Fri, 25 May 2007 23:36:49 -0500, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can probably try and forget raising any issue (except probably an
abend) with any utility in the book. IIRC they are functionally
stabilized.
Except as mandated by the environment.
What were the most recent utilities
On Sat, 26 May 2007 14:33:35 EDT, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:
Maybe users should read the documentation (if it mentions this exposure),
realize that there is an exposure (this may be asking a lot), and add a DD
statement to the step that does the dynamic allocation so the Initiator
In a message dated 5/26/2007 1:53:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good idea. I'll ask my admins to add to my (and other users') TSO logon
PROCs DD statements for data set names that we're likely to allocate
dymamically in our TSO sessions.
So far, I thought this
On May 26, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2007 23:36:49 -0500, Ed Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can probably try and forget raising any issue (except probably an
abend) with any utility in the book. IIRC they are functionally
stabilized.
Except as mandated by
Are TSO logon PROCs on your system likely to have multiple steps?
I forget the code (S622?), but TSO will abend the user if there's more than one
step in a TSO PROC.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070526/ap_on_hi_te/
reprogramming_programmers_1;_ylt=AofT.RhpTGKWVlU5o3YhheAE1vAI
U.S. colleges retool programming classes (watch the wrap)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Hi listers,
as the subject,to print report from z/OS over the IP LAN printer, would
like to know your opinioin . thanks for your advisement.
Laurence
_
在您的行動裝置上傳送接收 Hotmail 郵件，請移至:
http://zh-asiasms.mobile.msn.com
Tsai Laurence wrote:
Hi listers,
as the subject,to print report from z/OS over the IP LAN printer, would
like to know your opinioin . thanks for your advisement.
Laurence
Biggest difference I can think of off hand is with IP Printway you can
define a IP based printer that uses LDP, then
On Sat, 26 May 2007 15:09:36 EDT, IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote:
Good idea. I'll ask my admins to add to my (and other users') TSO logon
PROCs DD statements for data set names that we're likely to allocate
dymamically in our TSO sessions.
So far, I thought this thread was all about
On Fri, 25 May 2007 00:58:32 +, Dave Salt wrote:
I agree; TRANSMIT is a great way to pack a PDS into a sequential file. But
when it comes to transferring files to or from a PC, whether they are
sequential (including transmit format) or individual members of a PDS, I
much prefer the ISPF
17 matches
Mail list logo
