Unless I missed something in the APAR text, I don't understand if this is
merely a pumped up version of TRSMAIN. That is--assuming the kind of flat
files we're accustomed to--are tersed files interchangeable between the two
programs? TRSMAIN has been used for many years by ISVs in the same way IBM
Patrick said: "Broken as Designed" was not an APARable condition.
This may be true but "Working As Designed" or "WAD" has been a common
response when in reality it should probably have been "Working As Coded"
or "WAC" (aka Wacky).
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Serv
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:12:37 -0500, Alex UMX wrote:
>APAR OA19194 just closed - supported version of TERSE, with PDSE support.
>
>PTF is not yet available
>
Can Unix files be far behind?
(Still recalling the time when my files to reproduce an issue were
in HFS and IBM requested them TERSEd.)
--
>>> On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 4:23 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Barry
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
> 09/04/2007
>at 09:32 AM, "Britz, Anton - CO 7th" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>I am still not sure why anybody would want to run an IBM operating
>>syste
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:18:56 +1000, Fenner, Jim wrote:
>
>avoiding issuing superfluous HRECALLs for non-migrated datasets. Too
>many of the latter can clog the tape management system.
>
How does the TMS get involved for non-migrated data sets? Is the
HMS catalog itself migrated to tape?
>That was
A quick way to "reconstitute" the data is:
issue: bnds 1 80
place a period in col 71 of line before misplaced seqid.
use textflow TF on the line with the period to bring seqid back to
where it belongs.
good luck
pup
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 09/14/2007
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:04:17 +0200, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>... Again
>came the reply that this was the design of the msgid filter and the
>design was not going to be changed, period. ...
For a long time it was (and I assume still is) IBM's policy that APARs
are r
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
09/04/2007
at 09:32 AM, "Britz, Anton - CO 7th" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am still not sure why anybody would want to run an IBM operating
>system on a PC.
It makes way better sense than running Linux on a Mainframe.
db
-
Thanks all especially Steve and Jim. I got the utility assembled. I
really appreciate everything. Have a good weekend.
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
Confidentiality Notice
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and may be
privileged
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
It's 80:
TECH.DITTO.SRCLIB(DITTDAIR) - 01.0
It's 80:
TECH.DITTO.SRCLIB(DITTDAIR) - 01.00 Columns 9 00080
===> Scroll ===> CSR
-1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8
PROFILE UNLOCKIMACRO NONEPACK OFFNOTE ON
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on firs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
This is the code:
DAIR9900 DS0H
This is the code:
DAIR9900 DS0H
DITTRACE ID=EXIT TRACE
L R13,4(R13) RESTORE REGISTER 13
ASE01670
Robert,
I agree with Steve. It looks to me like sequence numbers that should be
in cols 73-80 ended up in cols 1-8 of the next record.
Robert Pelletier wrote:
Can someone with more experience in assembler than I have fix this:
000BDE 58DD 00044 1019 L R13,4(R13
It looks like data wrap. Verify that the source basically lines up in CC
1, 10, & 16.
If the data starts look
ing like th
is then you have a dat
a wrap problem.
Regards,
Steve Thompson
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert
Can someone with more experience in assembler than I have fix this:
000BDE 58DD 00044 1019 L R13,4(R13)
RESTO
1020 ASE01670
** ASMA142E Operation code not complete on first record
Active Usings: PSA(X'1000'),R0 S99RB(X'1000')
Greetings,
Preface: I am not a performance analyst. I have no idea what these
products do, hence my question.
Our capacity analysis team is looking at SAS ITRM 3.1 functionality.
In breezing through the synopsis:
http://www.sas.com/solutions/itresource/fact.pdf
this reads like extensions i
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 11:38:15 -0400, Lizette Koehler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>Okay, I have a list of UCB ranges. I need to take the string and clump them
back together. My entries are on individual lines. I am thinking a REXX
might be the best process with a sort, but not sure if someone may
Thanks Jim!!
Executed the command as suggested. The CPU status went from a plus '+'
to a 'N' as expected and desired.
Thanks all!!
Hal
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 3:29 PM
To:
Okay, I have a list of UCB ranges. I need to take the string and clump them
back together. My entries are on individual lines. I am thinking a REXX might
be the best process with a sort, but not sure if someone may have already have
something they could share with me.
For example:
1000, 10
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:52:51 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark,
>I didn't say that IDCAMS can be used for zFS when in use, did I ?
>The same apply to DB2 files. Bothe can be copied using IDCAMS, but not
>when used by application. However both cannot be processed on record
>level due to.
Dan,
What is your sync point to recover your Data and Operating System: User
data, Catalogs, TMC, etc must be in sync.
You indicate that you do not do incrementals (ie ABARS). That tells me
that your sync point must be the weekend full volume backups. Are you also
backing up your application/u
Has anyone got the DITTO utility to work from the CBT Tape? I did as
instructed and the MACLIB is empty and assemblies fail.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
Confidentiality Notice
Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidentia
APAR OA19194 just closed - supported version of TERSE, with PDSE support.
PTF is not yet available
Alex
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM
Mark,
I didn't say that IDCAMS can be used for zFS when in use, did I ?
The same apply to DB2 files. Bothe can be copied using IDCAMS, but not
when used by application. However both cannot be processed on record
level due to... lack of records.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Mark Zelden
Mark,
Thanks for the feedback.
Incidentally, the Migration Checker tool has had an additional side-effect
of detecting some incorrect IKJTSOxx settings too, in at least two instances
I know of :)...
-Marna WALLE
z/OS System Build and Install
IBM Poughkeepsie
Daniel,
Russell Witt makes a good point about your daily BCS and VMF backups.
But if those are not working for you in your DR situation then I
understand the issue confronting you.
If you are a Dino-Softrware T-REX customer you can use the AUDIT
FOCUS(TAPE) OBJECT(UNCATALOG) or the TAPEAUDI
Yeah that must be an error in the RedBook. I just checked and there
is an updated (02) version called z/OS Distributed File Service zSeries
File System z/OS V1R7 Implementation, but it says the same thing:
"You can back up zFS file systems by doing the following:
A zF
I must be missing something. If you backup the catalogs and the TLSM VMF on
a daily basis; why is the TLMS database restored at the xxx+6 level and the
catalog's are restored at the xxx level? If the catalogs are backed up
daily, they should be restored from the latest backup along with the VMF.
R
This is my assembly:
//ASM PROC NAME=,
// LIST='SYSOUT=*'
//ASM EXEC PGM=ASMA90,COND=(4,LT),
// REGION=4096K,
//
>For better or worse (mostly worse), there is no documented way to display the
>values that you provided via IEAOPTxx.
OMEGAMON (or other monitors) may show some, but not necessarilly all.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For better or worse (mostly worse), there is no documented way to display
the values that you provided via IEAOPTxx.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Baseline dumps are done once per week, full volume. TLMS and catalogs are
backed up each day. We don't use ABARS or any other incrementals.
Established BMT...evolving slowly...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
"Daniel McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Urgent!
> We are at DR and are having issues and a debate. System restored to
Day
> XXX and declared DR happened XXX + 6. TLMS restored to XXX + 6. Here's
> the problem we're discussing. What about the catalogs
Hello everybody,
I've seen some weird XCFAS behavior in one of our systems recently that I'm
trying to understand/explain so I need your help.
This used to be a 3 way sysplex on 2 cpcs and everything was fine. The company
I work for then decided to outsource it and
we kind of lost control over w
Urgent!
We are at DR and are having issues and a debate. System restored to Day
XXX and declared DR happened XXX + 6. TLMS restored to XXX + 6. Here's
the problem we're discussing. What about the catalogs? Do we restore them
to XXX + 6 or is there a TLMS synch thing we need to run? We don't have
You cannot work at record level with neither DB2 (table/index space)
datasets, not zFS. Reason: those datasets are LINEAR. LDS does not
contain records.
However using IDCAMS against DB2 LDSes is pefrectly safe AFAIK.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
While it, and DB2
-- snip --
Having said that, I heartily endorse the technology. We started mirroring
DASD in the late 90's when we still had to use conventional channel
extenders. However you do it, nothing improves performance more than money
does. ;-)
-- snip --
I agree Skip. Knowing that one has a copy of thei
Jim,
I thought about a Assembler Solution to do so (RECALL would be enough
for me).
Bye,
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-M
"Bob Halpern" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> As a member of the Candle Omegamon CICS team, I visited IBM Hursley
involved
> with CICS 3.0/3.1 interfaces. It took us hours to gat across the
concept
> that a monitoring product has to show what is happening behind t
Hello Michael,
RECALL
Try online
TSO HRECALL 'fully.qualified.dataset.name' NOWAIT
For batch a colleague had to write a rexx to conditionally recall
datasets as the first step of the job, or an entire sequence of jobs. It
uses catalog search to decide if the dataset(s) needs recalling, th
All,
I wonder how can I recall/recover a migrated dataset. Of course I don't
just want to open the file - then my application would be blocked until
the dataset is online again.
Thank you,
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
43 matches
Mail list logo
