Hi,
I am Deepankar Ramteke
and I want to unsubscribe from the discussion group.
Thanks!!!
Deepankar Ramteke
Software Engineer
AtosOrigin India Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai
Desk:+9122-28377824(472)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.atosorigin.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Lis
Mark,
>Some of the "stupid" checks that Barbara mentions, I've just deleted
>or updated rather than complain. I agree that the checks could be
>smarter.
Well, I only mentioned them again because I *should* not have to delete them.
Also, you may want to recheck the CHECK(IBMUSS,USS_AUTOMOUNT_DEL
During a google search about vwlc & softcapping, I found a interesting ISV
link to cost control but I dont remember his name. He makes the same like
lpar group capacity
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instruc
"Ediger Mark - medige" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>..
..
> Lizette,
>
> ALLOWED and ENABLED are basically the same and both put the structure
as
> duplexed. But with ALLOWED you have to explicitly start duplexing with
> the SETXCF START command. If you have ALLOWE
"Lizette Koehler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> List -
>
> I have been working with the manuals last night, but am not getting a
really
> clear picture on structure rebuild and preference list with duplexing
in the
> CF.
>
> I have a DB2 group buffer pool whos
Lizette,
the best description for the rebuild process can be found in the sysplex
services guide, chapter 5.5 (z/OS 1.8). It is a multiple phase process that was
added to over the years. Rebuilding a structure generally means that the
location of the structure is changed. Altering a structure m
Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most of )
your papers and I find them very precise and useful. Unluckily here I'm
the only reader of them.
I have 2 question I'd really like to ask to you as WLM expert. I received
answers, but I ask them again:
1) Say I have a vel
The bottom of every post has some instruciotn how to communicate
with the listserver and ask for information.
send amail to the address given there. The content of the mail
is:
unsubscribe IBM-MAIN
--
Peter Hunkeler
CREDIT SUISSE
--
Resent as there was an error in the previous mail
---
Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most of )
your papers and I find them very precise and useful. Unluckily here I'm
the only reader of them.
I h
Hi,
We had created the stand alone tape for the IPL. Now we are trying to load
it from Tape.
We specify the Load address on the HMC screen as 890 ( which is our tape
device )
We had mounted the tape before we tried to load & also the tape device were
brought to offline in other LPAR's
The Tape
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:32:52 +0200, Chris Mason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In any case the OP didn't actually specify WTOR so the functions you
>mentioned may well be exactly what he/she needs.
>
And if the OP really does need WTOR, he can always encapsulate that in a
fetchable assembler sub-rou
It's the notify going to the owner..in this case a tso id..
wanted to stay away from exit's...but more thought...this owner/userid is
setup on racf with tso authority...thinking that may trigger this
happening..the user is ca7 and do not think it needs the tso attribute
anyway..any thoughts on t
Sam
How about having freebe at your site for down load...do not have acces to
cbt..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged information. T
Are you referring to Al Sherkow and his LCS software? Al also moderates
the LPAR-Pricing listerserv.
Bob Richards
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 3:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.U
We don't endorse any particular solution but currently use TriTune & APC
from AQM Solutions http://www.aqm-solutions.com/
This space has some good options outside Strobe including FreezeFrame
(Macro4), APA (IBM), TriTUne (AQM Solutions).
Best Regards,
Sam
Sometimes TRSMAIN today will fail with a space error on the intermediate
work file.
An unsupported undocumented option for the current TRSMAIN is adding the
TMPSPACE DD. This usually will let you terse PDSE or other things that
mess up it's calculations for work space like a large RECFM VB PDS.
Hi,
We are a large IMS DC/DB shop and CICS DB2/IMS DBCTL. IMS is still an
order of magnitude more efficient than DB2. That is not saying anything
bad about DB2 it is designed for more flexible data manipulation and
easier development by offloading more business and data handling logic
into the
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ramteke, Deepankar
>
> Hi,
> I am Deepankar Ramteke
> and I want to unsubscribe from the discussion group.
> Thanks!!!
Permission granted, although not needed. You are free to unsubscribe
(and resubscribe later, if y
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Gould
> Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 9:45 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: IBM Releases Office Desktop Software at No
> Charge to Foster Collaboration and Innovation
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:15 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: How does one delete old entries in EDT? HELP!
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From
Kees,
Sorry for the confusion. You are right. The KEEP=OLD parm is only on
the SETXCF STOP,REBUILD.
Mark
>
Mark
I don't see a KEEP= parameter on the SETXCF START,REBUILD command.
There is on on the SETXCF STOP,REBUILD to tell X
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:09:13 +0200, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark,
>
>>Some of the "stupid" checks that Barbara mentions, I've just deleted
>>or updated rather than complain. I agree that the checks could be
>>smarter.
>
>Well, I only mentioned them again because I *should* not hav
See the instructions at the bottom of each post
Hi,
I am Deepankar Ramteke
and I want to unsubscribe from the discussion group.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First, let's try the obvious.
Did you try using 0890 (four digit device number) for the load address?
There are also some special load parameters you should use with Standalone
Dump. I can't remember them right now, but I'm sure they are documented in
the books.
It would also help if you could
And, if you follow the instructions in the three-line disclaimer at the end
of every post to IBM-MAIN (including this one), you'll receive an email
that will explain how to unsubscribe (among other things).
Tom
-
You probablt need to specify a four digit device number, as opposed to the
three digit that you specified in the email, just like a DASD IPL device.
Jack Kelly
LA Systems @ US Courts
x 202-502-2390
-IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote: -
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
From: Mohan <[EMAIL
In a message dated 9/20/2007 8:48:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
treating it as an unlabeled (external) tape. He is trying to restore the
tape
and we keep getting 813-04 errors. We're open to suggestions, examples, and
even a chuckle at our expense.
>>
Are
While wrapping up our DR, my boss dumped his files to a 3590-E tape. The
only tape drives at 'home' of that flavor are in the ATL. We inserted the tape,
treating it as an unlabeled (external) tape. He is trying to restore the tape
and we keep getting 813-04 errors. We're open to suggestions, exa
The DSN is wrong or use BLP.
Have a Nice Day !
Bob Pelletier
Connecticut Student Loan Foundation
Rocky Hill, Ct.
While wrapping up our DR, my boss dumped his files to a 3590-E tape. The
only tape drives at 'home' of that flavor are in the ATL. We inserted
the tape, treating it as an unlabeled
But how are you reading it; NL, BLP or SL?
Isn't it being treated as an SL and the 813 says the DSN you specify in
the JCL doesn't match the DSN recorded in the HDR1 (last 17 chars) on
the tape?
Alan
-Original Message-
Subject: Tape Question
While wrapping up our DR, my boss dumped his
04An OPEN macro instruction was issued for a data set on magnetic
tape, but the data set name on the header label did not match
that in the JFCB. Verify that the DD statement specifies the
correct DSNAME and volume serial number. If they are correct,
Knutson, Sam wrote:
We are a large IMS DC/DB shop and CICS DB2/IMS DBCTL. IMS is still an
order of magnitude more efficient than DB2. That is not saying anything
bad about DB2 it is designed for more flexible data manipulation and
easier development by offloading more business and data handlin
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ron Wells
>
> Sam
> How about having freebe at your site for down load...do not
> have acces to cbt..
Wow! And I thought our "net nanny" was obtuse..
-jc-
--
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel McLaughlin
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 8:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Tape Question
>
>
> While wrapping up our DR, my boss dumped his files to a
> 3590-E t
--
>Permission granted, although not needed. You are free to unsubscribe
>(and resubscribe later, if you so desire) at any time of your own
>choosing. You need not seek permission from anybody to do so; nor do
>you even need to notify anybody when you do so.
ROFL. My colleagues stared ate me as
Now, I remember the Software name but not the company, its ZCOST, you can
find their URL by google or by other search engine because I havent browser
access for this moment
Now, I remember the software name but not the compagny, it's ZCOST.
You can find there URL by Google or by other engin
On 19 Sep 2007 13:15:46 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>> I forgot to say - the sort can't change the order of transactions of a
>> particular type.
>
>I'm not sure what you mean by that. Can you please show and explain an
>example of your input records and expected output records tha
Maybe add a sequence number to all input records and then sort by record
type /sequence number.
On 9/20/07, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 19 Sep 2007 13:15:46 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>
> >> I forgot to say - the sort can't change the order of transactions of a
Walter,
I have a set of macros that do very basic conversion from either a COPYBOOK
or a MACRO. If you are interested, please, contact me offline.
-Victor-
PS. Here's a sample output
* - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - *
* Converting Data defined by CBUFF CopyBook
Dan:
The 813-04 abend is due to the dsname in your jcl not matching the dsname on
the tape. You either have to specify the dsname in the jcl to match the tape
and treat it as a SL tape, or you can use LABEL=(2,BLP) to just process the
data(skipping over the internal label). If you choose the B
Howard Brazee wrote on 09/20/2007 07:39:37 AM:
> I see you gave code elsewhere.
> ...
Yes, and I believe it does what you want based on your examples.
If not, then please show an example of input records where it
doesn't do what you want and the expected output for those
input records.
Frank Yaeg
Patrice,
I have a very basic problem with the approach used by zCost. It seems
counterintuitive to cap workloads based solely on cost. Maybe it is my large
scale systems mentality.
Are not these workloads contributing to revenue generation? If they aren't,
then use WLM to make them less impor
---
The 813-04 abend is due to the dsname in your jcl not matching the
dsname on the tape. You either have to specify the dsname in the jcl
to match the tape and treat it as a SL tape, or you can use
LABEL=(2,BLP) to just process the data(skipping over t
>
> Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most of
)
> your papers and I find them very precise and useful. Unluckily here
I'm
> the only reader of them.
>
>
> Max Scarpa
>
Beg your pardon, but I have read Steve's excellent papers and his book
(both the older hard copy a
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 11:12:12 -0500, Kelman, Tom wrote:
>>
>> Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most of
>)
>> your papers and I find them very precise and useful. Unluckily here
>I'm
>> the only reader of them.
>>
>>
>> Max Scarpa
>>
>Beg your pardon, but I have read St
That Max is the only reader of these papers at this site? Sounds like it.
I think Tom mis-read it.
Personally I'd start by working WLM from top down, with regards to
importance, to try to make sense of the situation. If WLM is just spinning
its wheels due to unobtainable goals that could be jus
> Steve Scarpa Posted:
> >>
> >> Hi Steve and thank you a lot for your replies. I read (I think most
of
> >)
> >> your papers and I find them very precise and useful. Unluckily here
> >I'm
> >> the only reader of them.
> >>
> >>
> >> Max Scarpa
> >>
>
> Tom Kelman Posted:
>
> >Beg your pardon, but
On 20 Sep 2007 08:19:01 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Yaeger)
wrote:
>Yes, and I believe it does what you want based on your examples.
>If not, then please show an example of input records where it
>doesn't do what you want and the expected output for those
>input records.
Thanks.
Rick:
Thanks, you are correct. I just copied the jcl I usually use and forgot I
had changed the JCL for looking at some test data I generated.
Good Catch!
Bill
From: Rick Fochtman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape Questi
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:58:46 EDT, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>In a message dated 9/20/2007 8:48:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>treating it as an unlabeled (external) tape. He is trying to restore the tape
>and we keep getting 813-04 errors. We're open t
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 10:57:55 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
>---
>> To determine the internal label and dsn, you
>> can use a tape map program, if one is available or you can use
>> IEBGENER as follows:
>>
>> //STEP01 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
>> //SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
I got a couple of requests for my all-REXX block letter routine, so here it
is. There should be no EBCDIC-ASCII problems; there are no strange
characters in here that I know of.
Right now this program just displays its output. Obviously it could be made
to return it to a caller. I leave it to the
Keep in mind that if the fully qualified dsname is longer than 17 bytes,
you
will only see the last 17 bytes of it in the tape hdr, but you still need
the full name in your JCL.
Actually, you don't need the full name in your JCL. You can use the 17
byte
name if it is a valid DSNAME, or you
In a message dated 9/20/2007 1:27:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
the way in CA's TMS? Or are 99000 and 98000 the same in both?
99000 = Catlg control, 98000 = bypass tape mgt.
>>
I thought they were the same, but stuff changes as do my optics.
**
File 1 is the volume label, file 2 is the 1st data set label. Bill had it
right.
Nope! VOL1 and the first HDR1 are both in file 1.
From: Tom Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Tape Question
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:29:
---
File 1 is the volume label, file 2 is the 1st data set label. Bill had
it right.
---
Someone needs to review the Tape Labels
publication.. BTDT
-
How about that IBM model 539 Pin ticket converter ?
(made a terrible grinding sound...)
In the 60's - Clothing stores attached a pin ticket to dresses (for
example), when sold, the tickets were sent to the DP department where
unit record operators (like me) would put them on a spindel and feed
the
Hi folks!
Im receiving this message bellow from OMEGAMOM when I access the Cics
Job Name by KC2A01D painel.
Message:
*---*
| KC20101OMEGAMON II for CICS |
| |
| An internal OMEGAMON I
On Sep 20, 2007, at 2:10 PM, HELIO wrote:
Hi folks!
Im receiving this message bellow from OMEGAMOM when I access the
Cics Job Name by KC2A01D painel.
Message:
==SNIP===
Call the vendor
--
For IBM-MA
Typically this type of error will probably go back to the vendor (IBM). A
program check is in the vendor's code and not necessarily something you are
doing wrong.
OB0910 PROGRAM CHECK - RECOVERY SUCCESSFUL -
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:06:33 +0200, Chris Mason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>[3] From the Cisco site: "BTU - (basic transmission unit) In SNA, the
unit
>of data and control information passed between path control
components. A
>BTU can consist of one or more path information units." SNA For
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 03:06:33 +0200, Chris Mason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>(... I (re)discovered that a BTU is the assemblage of
>the TH and BIU - typically the RH and RU - before it is checked against
the
>MAXDATA specification and segmented into PIUs. ...
This is apparently a a new rede
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 13:59:54 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
>---
>File 1 is the volume label, file 2 is the 1st data set label. Bill had it
>right.
>---
>Someone needs to review the Tape Labels publication...
Pat
It could well be that we are both right in that SNA architecture has
highjacked a set of initials used by what can be characterised as that part
of pre-SNA NCP which interworked with TCAM and VTAM basic mode and which
became called in later NCPs as the BSC-start-stop processor - or somethi
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 11:32 -0400, Richards.Bob wrote:
>
> I have a very basic problem with the approach used by zCost. It seems
> counterintuitive to cap workloads based solely on cost. Maybe it is my
> large scale systems mentality.
Must be, Bob - one day you'll be out in the hungry world of
In a message dated 9/20/2007 2:11:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
them into a 539 that would (sometimes) convert them to a standard
5081cards, which were then fed to a card reader on the new S360-30 for
an inventory system.
>>
Yeah, one of first real jobs as a Co
Something to Remember,
Java is a Byte Code (two bytes actually) interpretive language, where
the byte code corresponds to a Machines Instruction on the Virtual CPU.
When a compiled Java program runs, it still must interpret the Byte Code
into the actual CPU's Byte Code, then process the instructi
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 08:08:19 -0400, Knutson, Sam wrote:
>Sometimes TRSMAIN today will fail with a space error on the intermediate
>work file.
>
>An unsupported undocumented option for the current TRSMAIN is adding the
>TMPSPACE DD. This usually will let you terse PDSE or other things that
>mess u
Max,
Thanks for asking. These are two questions that come up a lot in
discussing WLM.
1. As I recall discussions of five years ago, work that doesn't meet
goal is not set aside in some way. WLM keeps trying, so the chronic
underachiever can adversely affect other work.
Now you should ask yourse
69 matches
Mail list logo
