On Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:07:18 +0800 "Sivakumar, Manikandan"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>As I am working as Program Products installations, I would like to know
:>some short cut commands in ISPF/TSO to simplify my tasks.
:>Ex. Cut/Move/Copy/Paste/Label/ X ALL Is it possible to run as
:>script
Lizette,
Thanks for your response!. I would prefer to simply my tasks while using
Copy/Paste/Cut/Move/Label... Is it possible to run as script?
I would like to know your best advice on X ALL command.
Mani.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark,
As I am working as Program Products installations, I would like to know
some short cut commands in ISPF/TSO to simplify my tasks.
Ex. Cut/Move/Copy/Paste/Label/ X ALL Is it possible to run as
scripts?. Thanks for your support.
Regards,
Mani.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Main
FWIW, there's a fair (and increasing) amount of z/OS written in C and/or
C++. The SDK for Java immediately leaps to mind as an example.
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Software Architect
Specializing in Software Architectures Related to System z
Based in Tokyo, Serving IBM Jap
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:27:56 -0600 Ed Gould said:
>
>But to your answer thats fine but IBM is not doing real education (ie
>assembler) or any other low level language in colleges (to the best
>of my knowledge). How else do you think these future people will
>support LINUX? PLX? hahaha IBM does *NOT
At 00:45 -0600 on 02/17/2008, Ed Gould wrote about Re: DFSMS APAR
OA22738 - IGD17295I:
On Feb 16, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 16:09 -0600 on 02/15/2008, Mark Zelden wrote about DFSMS APAR
OA22738 - IGD17295I:
Interesting. I had an extended off-list thread with someo
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: JES2 NJE question: SNA(CTC) vs. TCPIP
>
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:48:59 -0800, Gibney, Dave
> There's a D/R situation that's just waiting to happen.
Here's one that occurred just over a month ago, very close to home:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/calgary/story/2008/01/10/injuries-landing.html
> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:45:26 -0600
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: D/R situa
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:11:53 -0600, Ed Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't believe it runs on a MAC, yet.
Just as F.Y.I.:
Linux does and has run MAC's. The most recent non-Intel MAC's are Power
based. Here is document from IBM about Linux on MAC from 2004.
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:48:59 -0800, Gibney, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
> That was the whole point, John doesn't need his Network folks
>permission or to even tell them if he uses a private IP address for
>Hipersockets inside one CEC !!!
>...
Not necessarily true. If the Hipersockets
All,
Ted,,,I am an ex-VM, VM/SP1 thru z/VM. MVS -- OS/VS2 thru z/OS 1.6. I was
once a big VM bigot working as an internals VM System Programmer for
10+ years before jumping into MVS because of the availability of work. I
enjoy both systems and love Linux too. Every Operating system and
programming
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:11:53 -0600, Ed Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Its been IBM's mode of writing OS code since OS/360 and if I am not
>to far off some version of PLS has been responsible for every release
>of OS/360 all the way up to Z/os . of course if ita not done in PLx
>it was written
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:11:53 -0600, Ed Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Its been IBM's mode of writing OS code since OS/360 and if I am not
>to far off some version of PLS has been responsible for every release
>of OS/360 all the way up to Z/os . of course if ita not done in PLx
>it was written
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rick Fochtman) writes:
> IMHO, the programming language, whether for applications or operating
> systems, is unimportant, PROVIDED that all the n
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
> Of course, there would be much wailing and gnashing of teeth from
> customers discovering that code compiled to the bar
It seems that IBM is attacking the symptom not the problem. Since PDSEs
are only allowed to be single version, why not just FORCE the vol-count
to be 1 and issue a message STATING this was done if the dynamic
allocation requests/allows allocation of more
BTW does anyone know how many people are in digest mode? I have been on
a few lists in digest and never noticed a separate CC was needed.
-
It's not "needed"; it's a small courtesy that many in digest mode choose
-
Mark Post wrote:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 5:14 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ed Gould
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-A whole mess of drivel completely out of touch with reality-
Sad to see that his general level of coherency and i
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 18:00:23 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
(apparently quoting himself)
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Phil Smith III wrote:
>>>
>>> The good news is, it's worth the trouble...
>>>
You mean, such as unrestricted 64-bit capability?
>> If the ruse of LINUX is to re-write MVS (to start o
On Feb 17, 2008, at 12:45 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
---
SNIP-
I know of no laptop that I would trust as a pilot, to provide me
with enroute and approach charts. It gets a little busy up there
when you are in marginal weather
HI Maarten,
sorry for delay, but you have rc/rsn ( 61/741C7218 )
but I have rc/rsn ( 61/12140272) which is :
JRSocketNotCon: The requested socket is not connected
THANKS
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:14:25 +0100, Maarten Slegtenhorst
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Gamal,
>
>/resend of earlier messa
21 matches
Mail list logo
