The non-SMS volumes are not automatically processed like the SMS ones, you
have to specify them specifically. You use the ADDVOL parameter (look in
the HSM Storage Administration Reference for ADDVOL). You don't specify
ADDVOL for SMS volumes, just the non-SMS one.
Brian Westerman
and From the
ps,
You might want a threshold under 100% , 0%.
Primary volumes
Both high and low thresholds apply. If the first limit (high threshold) is
specified as 100 or if it is not greater than the second limit (low
threshold), or if the low threshold is equal to zero, no thresholds are
defined for the
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 15:33:19 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote:
http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/149022/faq_how_to_dodge_the_dns_bug.html
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9110622
http://www.doxpara.com/
Is z/OS
Folks
I am experiencing a new problem using IRRUT200 which is used to make a copy
of our RACF database. We have been running this job for eons then suddenly
we started getting D37-04 abends. What appears to be happening is no matter
what SPACE value we specify it is being 'clobbered' and we end
HI,
For updates, Please take a look at my site (mfnetdisk.com).
Thanks,
Shai
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:28:20 +0300, james smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks
I am experiencing a new problem using IRRUT200 which is used to make a copy
of our RACF database. We have been running this job for eons then suddenly
we started getting D37-04 abends. What appears to be happening is
I would check you ACS routines to see if they have changed for this dataset.
ACS can be coded so that no matter what the JCL says, the dataset only gets
a specific amount.
If you cannot preallocate the data set in an SMS pool with the space you
want, it is like the space management tool (ACS
Scott
Good call - that did the trick. I'm on vacation starting next week - I
think my 'brain cells' must have already left :-)
Thanks
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Scott Barry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:28:20 +0300, james smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Folks
I am
--snip-
You know the rules: If it's a security APAR, IBM won't disclose that
information, will they?
unsnip-
With appropriate permissions from your corporate officers
-snip
Well, it might be that it was cheaper than lugging and storing. All for
times gone by, buttoned down minds and pinheads drive me to distraction.
Lost funding for SHARE long time ago, haven't been back since early
nineties. Was
In a message dated 8/2/2008 10:10:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarcasm intended!!!
Yeah, the other heavy hitter is 'room service rates' for the chips at SCIDS.
Last time I saw numbers it was $16 a bowl(but that was 1991) other sources
say it's really high
http://www.informationweek.com/news/management/legal/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=209900983
Somewhat reminiscent of IBM vs. Platform. And IBM devoured Platform.
And Fundamental gave up without a fight.
I wonder if there might be a precedent here relevant to ... dare I even
use the H-word?
I
Skip,
Ok I tried doing Single Object Operations, and the ONLY storage
information I can see is under the Customize/Delete Activation profiles
icon.
I'll have to wait till I'm in the office on Monday to see what's
missing.
The HMC code level I tried it on is 2.9.2. The processor is a z9.
At
Skip Robinson wrote:
Due to some manna-like z upgrades, we now have for the first time a
'modern' HMC with the Linux-based web interface. Coincidentally we also
have for the first time the ability to access the HMC remotely via our
intranet. As long as we stick to 'Work Space' functions, remote
Alan,
Yes, the 'pie chart' is what I'm looking for. However, the old lovely and
easily discernible multicolored pie icon has given way to a hugely boring
blue circle with an 'i' in the middle. The information is displayed
differently, but it's still there when you need it: total storage
Skip Robinson wrote:
I see all that and way much more when logged on as SYSPROG. Almost nothing
when logged on as myself.
Your userid has the wrong privileges. You'll need to logon as ACSADMIN
(locally from work on the HMC) and correct that.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
On Fri, 1 Aug 2008 14:55:00 +0900, Timothy Sipples
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also probably worth mentioning is Stonesoft's firewall product:
http://www.stonesoft.com/en/products_and_solutions/products/fw/Certified_
Servers/IBM_Mainframe.html
Hate to break the news although I would have thought
Had an outage in the middle of this week due to the following reported to me:
IBM completed its analysis of the dump shipped and concluded the problem is
associated with APAR OA23299. APAR OA23299 is associated with long
running enclave that has been active for weeks in a service class with
Until the APAR can be applied, we took the outage early Sunday morning to
reboot all the LPARs and will each Sunday.
I have worked in shops that IPL'd less often than 1 time every 6 months.
This was before SYSPLEX.
To solve by IPL is unnacceptable!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
UNNUM will also get rid of the numbers that are already there, as well.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 4:40 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TSO/ISPF Numbering
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of james smith
Folks
I am experiencing a new problem using IRRUT200 which is used
to make a copy of our RACF database. We have been running
this job for eons then suddenly we started getting D37-04
abends.
We normally perform a scheduled IPL once per quarter at our main site. We
use our command scripting product to control the shutdown and restart, so
it's all automated. But the test partitions are probably IPLed once per
hour:) Some of our customers though schedule IPL's every week, which we do
22 matches
Mail list logo
