>I'm attempting to send an RCF to IBM using the address supplied
>by John Eells in this post:
>>Your message
>> Subject: Extraneous (And Confusing) Words in DFHSM Serialization
Descriptions
>>was not delivered to:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shouldn't this read MHVrcfs instead of MVHrcfs?
--
Peter H
In a message dated 11/25/2008 2:30:08 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
knee of the curve - but the curve for what?
>>
DB/2 lives in Buffer pool city. The first bottle neck is
underallocated pools. Lots of tuning opportunities. Craig Mullin's(formerly
with Platinum)
Bob Rutledge wrote:
Pick a book, any book...
BACK_2 Communicating Your Comments to IBM
z/OS MVS Data Areas, Volume 1 (ABEP - DALT)
I *did* pick a book -- z/OS DFSMShsm Implementation and Customization
Guide (SC35-0418-08) -- the one with the problems I wanted to report.
The Reader's Comment
Pick a book, any book...
BACK_2 Communicating Your Comments to IBM
z/OS MVS Data Areas, Volume 1 (ABEP - DALT)
Publication No. GA22-7581-11
...
If you prefer to send comments electronically, use the following e-mail
address:
- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can tease John at your leisure.
B
If they start talking layoffs, suggest an 18-month schedule...
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Ken Gunther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rex,
>
>Sadly our goal of getting off the mainframe still persists. We are in
> YEAR 15 of an 18 MONTH project to accomplish this goal ;-}.
>
>
Rex,
Sadly our goal of getting off the mainframe still persists. We are in
YEAR 15 of an 18 MONTH project to accomplish this goal ;-}.
Ken G.
Pommier, Rex R. wrote:
I concur also. I wonder what year my company was included in the "250
per 2 years" statistic. We bro
Try http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/webqs.html
George Fogg
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 4:52 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: RCFs are no longer accepted by IBM???
I'm attempting to send an RCF to IBM using the address supplied by John
Eells in this post:
http://bama.ua.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0610&L=ibm-main&P=R82229&I=1&X=-
It doesn't work ... :-(
Original Message
Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User mvhrcfs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) not listed
i
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:23:10 -0500, Don Poitras
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>If you're willing to write some code, you can use DPI to issue the
>traps. See:
>
>http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ezap4002/5.0
>...
I hadn't looked at DPI for several years so I had to r
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:04:10 -0600, Chris Mason
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>...
>Pat is stating that the SNMP command may also be used for
>sending TRAPs. My experience with the SNMP command - from
>about 15 years ago - regarding TRAPs is distilled into my
>presentation material under the tit
Hopefully you get what storage you need contiguous or it's not just an IPL
anymore..I got bit by this just last week.
--- On Tue, 11/25/08, Eric Bielefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Eric Bielefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Add Storage To Lpar - z/800
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Da
In a message dated 11/25/2008 7:57:03 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UNIT TYPE STATUS
9090 3390 O-RAL
RAL, as it turns out, means 'restricted to allocation', which I've never
seen before. I'm still looking, but currently stumped as to how it managed
to get into t
As it turns out, this is exactly what it was. The "TCB" field of the extract
macro data area had an x'0004' in it for some mysterious reason. I
zeroed it out explicitly. It should work better now.
Thanks for all of the suggestions!
David Logan
Manager of Product Development, Pitney Bowes Busi
Let me re-word this a little (I cut some out and garbled it badly)
You may want to ensure that you are zeroing out the storage used for the
list form. It could be that residual data is in the word that holds the
TCB address.
===
Wayne Driscoll
Omegamon
David,
Are you may want to ensure that you are zeroing out the storage used for
the list form. It could be that residual data is in the word that holds
the input TCB address.
===
Wayne Driscoll
Omegamon DB2 L3 Support/Development
wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 12:30:05 -0700, David Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A customer is reporting an abend S328 when they run our server. The message
>text I have found is included below. Does anyone know why this may be
>happening? It mystefies me, because all we are doing is calling EXTRACT
>FI
Sounds like something I'd initially approach like I would an S0C4 - an
addressing issue or perhaps an overlay. Than perhaps a timing issue
where the target daughter task is gone but the word has not spread yet.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Standard plea to customers: Find out how much memory you actually have on
each machine and ensure you deploy the right portions of that as reserved
to the right LPARs. (This is not the only situation this quarter where a
customer was forced to IPL to add memory out of idle to an LPAR.)
And stan
Changes to Daylight Saving Time:
MXG Software code is impervious to Daylight Savings Time; we give you
the data that is in your RMF,SMF, etc. data, as you choose to create it.
If you choose to set your clocks back on an active system, you corrupt
many datetime values (i.e, jobs end before they st
This message is posted to both IBM-MAIN and ASSEMBLER-LIST, since I don't
know who might be able to answer it.
A customer is reporting an abend S328 when they run our server. The message
text I have found is included below. Does anyone know why this may be
happening? It mystefies me, because al
I am out of the office until 12/01/2008.
If you require access to the z/OS Drafts respository, please send a note to
Bob Pfeiffer at ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBM-MAIN Digest - 23
Nov 2008 to 24 Nov 2008 (#2008-329)" sent on 11/25/08 0:00:03.
This
I just talked to our DBA, and yes, we did REBIND all of our packages. I
suspect we are now just over the knee of the curve - but the curve for what?
Eric
Roland Schiradin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks the memory issue was already covered. For DB2 V8 did you REBIND all of
> your pa
We issue the command and then refresh one of our (proprietary) online
tasks. That's it. Full bore production to include batch and a 7x24
online which includes a DB2 component.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kelman, Tom
Sent: F
Thanks to all that replied. I'll only reply to this answer to avoid cluttering
up the list. I suspected that I probably couldn't add any storage to this Lpar
without at least an IPL. Both of LP01 and LP02 have 2 GB defined for real
storage, and 1GB in reserve. I believe the 1GB in reserve g
Jim,
You can run Tomcat on z/OS and doing so then run JSPWiki which has some
blogging software already in it. JSPWiki moved to an official Apache
project. They have incorporated all sorts of new things into it. You can
also run JSPWiki within WebSphere Application Server.
You can run multip
Looks the memory issue was already covered. For DB2 V8 did you REBIND all of
your packages???
Regards Roland
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: G
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 11/25/2008
12:11:58 PM:
> Can real storage be added to an Lpar on a z/800 without shutting
> down the Lpar and re-IPLing? We have 4 Lpars defined, only two of
> them running now. Both Lpars have 3G of memory. I think the 2
> Lpars that aren't running
Did you define any storage as reserved in the activation profile? If so,
yes, you can. If not, I don't know of any way.
Note that it's not just a re-IPL you would need to do; you would need to
redefine the activation profile with more storage and then reactivate the
LPAR.
Kevin McKenzie
Ex
Can real storage be added to an Lpar on a z/800 without shutting down the Lpar
and re-IPLing? We have 4 Lpars defined, only two of them running now. Both
Lpars have 3G of memory. I think the 2 Lpars that aren't running have .5G
each. I know we have a little less than 1G that is free and unas
Lizette Koehler wrote:
> I have some basice questions on setting up the Tape Encryption on our TS3500.
>
> We have installed JAVA 1.5. I have a Data Class defined. I have an ACS
> routine to limit who can specifiy the encryption on tape.
>
> My basic Q's (and I have read the Planning Guide, the
I have some basice questions on setting up the Tape Encryption on our TS3500.
We have installed JAVA 1.5. I have a Data Class defined. I have an ACS
routine to limit who can specifiy the encryption on tape.
My basic Q's (and I have read the Planning Guide, the TS3500, and TS1120
Manuals and j
Kirk Wolf wrote:
Just curious -
Which JspWiki plugins do you use?
Had to configure filesystem that kept track of differences, email
support, RSS feed, and some other things. Don't remember if any of them
were plug-ins.
Do you use our SAF interface for Tomcat?
We use SAF for TOMCAT
>Are you now saying that you want to use the same set of target volumes for
>Z\os AND Z\VM source volumes?
Yes, and z/VM guest volumes as well.
I could potentially bring up a z/OS guest under z/VM and want to share the
DASD with other z/OS systems. Although that is not our current intent, it
sho
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008 09:42:36 -0500, Dean Montevago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>That I kind of figured. Wanted to know where the APF came into play.
>
Linkname: 26.1.5.1 "z/OS V1R10.0 MVS Authorized Assembler Services Guide"
IBM Library Server
URL:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bi
I don't he meant you were wasting anyone's time, just that you would likely get
more answers from VMers who don't watch this list. Some questions are better
asked on BOTH lists.
>>> Martin Kline <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 11/25/2008 10:36 AM >>>
> You might want to re-post on the IBMVM listserv.
Don
Martin,
Nobody suggested you wasted anyone's time. Your original post concerned a
problem with PPRC with VM interfering with a Z\os DASD mirror, i.e. Z\os target
volumes not being available due to being attached to Z\vm.
Are you now saying that you want to use the same set of target volumes for
> You might want to re-post on the IBMVM listserv.
Done, but I was under the impression that this was a 'mainframe' discussion
list, whereas the IBMVM list is strictly VM, and that since my issue stems from
a conflict between z/OS and z/VM that this list would be more appropriate.
My apologies
Henrique
Pat's response reminds me that I wanted to say something about this when I
first spotted it - but forgot!
I'm glad he has been able to provide you with an easier solution than I would
have offered since he is much more current with NetView than I am.
Your surprise can be taken to indi
Our solution is to bind twice, once for batch and once for CICS. There is one
application load library for each.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message
On 24 Nov 2008 14:09:23 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Big Iron)
wrote:
>IKJEFT01 returns the return code of the last TSO command executed (or,
>in your case, the only TSO command executed). The behaviour of
>IKJEFT1B will differ if there is more than one TSO command being
>processed. See
>http://publi
That I kind of figured. Wanted to know where the APF came into play.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 9:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPE Applycheck Allocation Error
Dean
Martin,
You might want to re-post on the IBMVM listserv. This is a different question
than the one you originally posted about your Z\os based PPRC not working.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Kline
[EMAIL PROTEC
Just curious -
Which JspWiki plugins do you use?
Do you use our SAF interface for Tomcat?
Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Edward Jaffe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Jousma, David wrote:
>
>> Jspwiki.org
>>
>>
>
> We use this one, with TOMCAT running under JZOS
We, too, were under the "bronzeplex" gun. "Going Gold" is proving to be even
more "interesting".
We merged 7 systems in 8 months (windows are hard to come by) for a huge
cost savings. Two were already sysplex, the rest were monoplex. Because
we share only enough DASD for the Couple Datasets
Thanks for the responses. Marking the devices 'notsupported' should fix the
immediate problem.
Is anyone successfully using PPRC devices in z/VM?
The documentation indicates PPRC is fully supported by VM and its guests, but
if the support is that every PPRC device must be marked 'notsupported'
Dean Montevago wrote:
What does the WAIT function do ?
Well... WAIT causes SMP/E to ...wait for dataset.
Documentation says:
WAIT=YES or WAIT= NO
indicates whether SMP/E should wait for the data set to be allocated if
the volume is not mounted or if the data set is already in use. Not
waitin
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:09:47 -0600, Henrique Seganfredo
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hello folks,
> >...
> >Surprisingly, the command line tool (/bin/snmp) that interfaces with
> >the snmp agent task only gives me the opportunity to RECEIVE
> >TRAP
It sounded like there was very little shared dasd from what Skip said, so I
don't think the security risk would be that high. Yes, if all dasd was shared,
I can see that that would be a problem.
This leads me to the last contract job that I had. The datacenter was
contracted out to another co
We have a set of volumes we snapshot our production data to each day so
PPRC can replicate it offsite. Those target volumes stay offline, but
yesterday, one of them managed to get into this state
UNIT TYPE STATUS
9090 3390 O-RAL
RAL, as it turns out, means 'restricted to allocation', which I
What does the WAIT function do ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 8:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SMPE Applycheck Allocation Error
> Oops; I remember. BTDT. It's
Oops; I remember. BTDT. It's the WAIT problem. When necessary, I've
dealt with this by removing the WAIT operand.
Yes, it is the WAIT operand on the DDDEF entry. That wait function does
indeed require the using program (GIMSMP in this case) to be authorized.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:38:45 -0800, Skip Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>In the interest of complete and brutal honesty, I can testify that it's
>possible to merge 'full function' parallel sysplexes while keeping the
>original RACF databases separate. It's not ideal, to be sure, but if you're
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> Rick Fochtman wrote:
> > I can HIGHLY recommend Shmuel Golob's (AKA Sam Golob's) Broadcast
> > Management tools.
>
> There are two Shmuels on IBM-MAIN?
There are at least three: Shmuel Koller occasi
Hello:
We want to obtain information about zIIP processors but our record interval
is too much high (INTVAL 15 minutes). Is possible obtain this information from
another way and with less interval?. We don't want change del INTVAL. From
RMF M-III we can only view the reports but we can't obta
I am out of the office until 12/01/2008.
For emergenices please call my IBM follow-me number 404-487-1405.
Thanks.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBM-MAIN Digest - 23
Nov 2008 to 24 Nov 2008 (#2008-329)" sent on 11/24/08 22:00:03.
This is the only notification you will r
On Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:39:37 -0600, Schneiderwent, Craig - DOT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I believe your fears are become manifest and that you must have DSNELI for
batch, DSNCLI for CICS, and DSNRLI in a stored procedure environment.
This can be solved by writing a COBOL routine named DSNHLI
John McKown wrote:
[...]
Remember that doing the same Google search is non
exact. I've done two identical searches within a few minutes of each other
and gotten slightly different results.
Remember this is "by design" feature of Google search. It's not text
search, order of results depends on
Good day
Many many thanks for supplying suggestions online and offline!
You all are GREAT!
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
58 matches
Mail list logo
