Re: CHECK(IBMCSV,CSV_LPA_CHANGES) exception for Device Support LPA

2009-05-19 Thread Russell Witt
Sam, I do not believe that r12 of CA Common Services is GA at this time, but will be later this year. I did verify that they are changing the way that modules are dynamically added to LPA to use the supported interface. One advantage we have is that since most CA products use CA Common Services fo

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Rick Fochtman
- Surely, if the table has internal pointers (adcons), these will still point above the line and thus be unusable in AMODE 24? - I've never tried it, but maybe

Submitting a "Marketing REQUEST" (was: BLOCK CONTAINS

2009-05-19 Thread Bill Klein
"Frank Swarbrick" wrote in message news:... > By the way, any pointers on how to submit a "marketing requirement"? VSE > actually has a "submit a requirement" web page (https://www- > 03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zvse/contact/requirement.html). Does > z/OS have anything similar?

Re: PDSE Anomaly?

2009-05-19 Thread Kevin Mckenzie
Read/write sharing of PDSEs between z/OS images not in the same sysplex is incredibly dangerous, and very much not supported. What happens when you do share read/write between PDSEs is undefined; if you're lucky, you can recover, if you aren't, you have to restore the dataset from backup. Read

Re: PDSE Anomaly?

2009-05-19 Thread John McKown
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Longnecker, Dennis wrote: > Exactly right two monoplex LPARS. > > In my situation on > > LPAR 1 DB2PROD.SDSNLOAD is cataloged on SYS033 > LPAR 2 DB2PROD.SDSNLOAD is cataloged on SYS033 > > On LPAR 1, I copied a load module from DSN910.SDSNLOAD to the > DB2PROD.SDSNLOA

Re: IBMLink broken again?

2009-05-19 Thread Clark Morris
On 19 May 2009 12:26:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On Tue, 19 May 2009 08:37:47 -0500, Field, Alan C. > wrote: > >>I can't access IBMLink through the web this morning. Any one else? >> >>Greenscreen works, as usual. >>... > >This was a test. They are making sure they are ready t

Re: PDSE Anomaly?

2009-05-19 Thread Longnecker, Dennis
Exactly right two monoplex LPARS. In my situation on LPAR 1 DB2PROD.SDSNLOAD is cataloged on SYS033 LPAR 2 DB2PROD.SDSNLOAD is cataloged on SYS033 On LPAR 1, I copied a load module from DSN910.SDSNLOAD to the DB2PROD.SDSNLOAD library. On LPAR 2, I could not see the updated load module in

Re: SMS migration concern 1.9 and 1.10 mixed level SMS translate, validate, activate on 1.9 caused storage leak in SMS leading to IPL

2009-05-19 Thread Traylor, Terry
OA28998 Terry Traylor charlesSCHWAB TIS Mainframe Storage Management Remedy Queue: tis-hs-mstg (602) 977-5154 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 2:48 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu S

Re: AMODE switching

2009-05-19 Thread john gilmore
Some further comments on Chris Craddock's comments: 1) The LSEXPAND macro instruction takes the form | LSEXPAND normal=n,recovery=r where 96 < n <= 16000, 24 < r <= 4000 the first time the macro is used and n(i-1) < n(i) <= 16000, r(i-1) < r(i) <= 4000 the i-th time, i > 1,

SMS migration concern 1.9 and 1.10 mixed level SMS translate, validate, activate on 1.9 caused storage leak in SMS leading to IPL

2009-05-19 Thread Knutson, Sam
Hi, Anyone know of an APAR for this or a documented migration action or existing toleration service? This tip was passed along from another account but I would expect this should have resulted in an APAR to prevent the storage exhaustion or one to prevent the activation in a mixed complex.

Re: BLOCK CONTAINS

2009-05-19 Thread Frank Swarbrick
On Mon, 18 May 2009 23:00:02 -0500, Bill Klein wrote: >Ted, > The issue that I think you are missing is that this entire conversation >started with a site trying to do a VSE to z/OS conversion. For this site, >this is a "major" concern. Certainly not the only one, but it is important >to unde

Re: BLOCK CONTAINS

2009-05-19 Thread Frank Swarbrick
On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:07:12 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >Is default unblocked an ANSI Standard requirement? (Of course >this doesn't preclude an extension implemented via compiler >option.) >From the 2002 standard (I don't have the 1985 standard): ---

Re: BLOCK CONTAINS

2009-05-19 Thread Frank Swarbrick
On Mon, 18 May 2009 13:08:28 -0500, John McKown wrote: >I just ran a quick test using Enterprise COBOL 3.4.1. I had one input FD and >three output FDs. The output FDs were: (1) No BLOCK CONTAINS at all; (2) >BLOCK CONTAINS 0 RECORDS; and (3) BLOCK CONTAINS 1 RECORDS. I directed each >to a sepa

Re: IBM Mainframe: 50 Years of Big Iron Innovation

2009-05-19 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. patrick.oke...@wamu.net (Patrick O'Keefe) writes: > But getting back to the memory lane slide show, I'm a bit surprised > the 650 is not included. It may not have b

Fw: JES2-Share Spool

2009-05-19 Thread Ron Wells
could it be something in isfparms for sdsf?? - Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 05/19/2009 03:53 PM - Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin 05/19/2009 02:56 PM To IBM Mainframe Discussion List cc Subject Fw: JES2-Share Spool Did following in SDSF to see it correctlybut how can I make this

Re: BLOCK CONTAINS

2009-05-19 Thread Frank Swarbrick
On Mon, 18 May 2009 11:03:05 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >On Mon, 18 May 2009 17:48:44 +0200, Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote: > >>On Friday 15 May 2009 04:47, Clark Morris wrote: >> >>> I submitted a SHARE requirement back in the 1990's to have >>> a compile option that the default be BLOCK 0.

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Gainsford, Allen
>>* LOAD the table; R1 has address, R0 has size in doublewords >>* Get storage below the line using the R0 value * 8 >>* Copy the table to your gotten storage > > Instead of copying it, use IARVSERV to map it below the line. > > -- > Tom Marchant Surely, if the table has internal pointers (adcons

Re: Article from SearchSecurity.com

2009-05-19 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Tue, 19 May 2009 14:40:02 -0500, Shedlock, George wrote: >You can also find a copy of this white paper here: (watch the wrap) >http://www.acxiom.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/website- resources/pdf/White_Papers/AC-2011-08%20The%20Relaity% 20Facing%20The%20Manframe%20World.pdf >... An oursourci

Fw: JES2-Share Spool

2009-05-19 Thread Ron Wells
Did following in SDSF to see it correctlybut how can I make this a default function>>> not understanding?? >> /$tjnn,sysaff=(*,ind) >>> - Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 05/19/2009 02:54 PM - Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin 05/19/2009 02:10 PM To IBM Mainframe Discussion List cc S

Re: Configuring APPN using Hipersockets

2009-05-19 Thread Chris Mason
John Here's some samples to get you started taken from some definitions I set up for a customer last year: Sample Enterprise Extender Major Node - VBUILD TYPE=XCA name PORT MEDIUM=HPRIP, enterprise extender *

Re: Article from SearchSecurity.com

2009-05-19 Thread Shedlock, George
You can also find a copy of this white paper here: (watch the wrap) http://www.acxiom.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/website-resources/pdf/White_Papers/AC-2011-08%20The%20Relaity%20Facing%20The%20Manframe%20World.pdf George Shedlock Jr AEGON Information Technology AEGON USA 502-560-3541 > TYPE: White

Re: IBMLink broken again?

2009-05-19 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Tue, 19 May 2009 08:37:47 -0500, Field, Alan C. wrote: >I can't access IBMLink through the web this morning. Any one else? > >Greenscreen works, as usual. >... This was a test. They are making sure they are ready to support the sunsetting of Green Screen access. They are. After July 1 w

Re: Article from SearchSecurity.com

2009-05-19 Thread Eatherly, John D[EQ]
Sorry. I didn't realize it. I didn't have to. Thanks John -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://

Re: Article from SearchSecurity.com

2009-05-19 Thread David Andrews
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 15:07 -0400, Eatherly, John D[EQ] wrote: > TYPE: White Paper Requires detailed registration to read it. Have to pass, thanks. -- David Andrews A. Duda and Sons, Inc. david.andr...@duda.com -- For IBM-MAIN

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:57:43 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: > >* LOAD the table; R1 has address, R0 has size in doublewords >* Get storage below the line using the R0 value * 8 >* Copy the table to your gotten storage Instead of copying it, use IARVSERV to map it below the line. -- Tom Marchant

JES2-Share Spool

2009-05-19 Thread Ron Wells
Have a question ... Just trying Shared Spool between (2) lpars..(A) and (B) lpars Have a NJE connection from (T) lpar to (A)... I route a output from (T) lpar to (A)lpar... I cannot see the out unless I do a ST command in SDSF ... ? and The output does not retain it's original owner infor

Re: common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy

2009-05-19 Thread Rob Scott
John, IIRC the addition of HVCOMMON is due to customer requests for it - for some maybe the setup required and usage for shared memobjs must have been too difficult to implement. I would also guess that using any non-primary mode and a special ALET is not going to be very popular as there are

Re: common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy

2009-05-19 Thread Wayne Driscoll
John, One problem with this type of dataspace is that there isn't a standard method to "own" pieces of dataspace storage. Dataspaces don't have FQE's, DQE's and FBQE's, or the control blocks that manage 64 bit memory objects, so how do you advertise that this piece of the dataspace contains you

Article from SearchSecurity.com

2009-05-19 Thread Eatherly, John D[EQ]
New data on Mainframe Computers in the last day: The Reality Facing the Mainframe World PUBLISHER: Acxiom Corporation TYPE: White Paper John -- For IBM-MAI

Re: common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy

2009-05-19 Thread Edward Jaffe
McKown, John wrote: Is AR mode that much more difficult / restrictive than AMODE(64)? Most HLL have no support for data spaces. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 edja...@phoenixsoftware.com http://www

Re: IBM Mainframe: 50 Years of Big Iron Innovation

2009-05-19 Thread Patrick O'Keefe
On Mon, 18 May 2009 10:03:22 -0600, Howard Brazee wrote: >... >My age only matters of one thing - if I wanted to retire today, I'd >get my pension. >... Really? My knees envy you. But getting back to the memory lane slide show, I'm a bit surprised the 650 is not included. It may not have bee

Re: common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy

2009-05-19 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > Unless there has been a change, dataspaces are limited to 2G. > Takes a lot of > dataspaces to map 100G. And one must screw around with a lot of ALETs. > > But I am glad some people are considering VSCR for 64 bit storage.

Re: common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy

2009-05-19 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 19 May 2009 13:43:20 -0500 "McKown, John" wrote: :>I'm reading the paper about IBM's plans for the 64-bit common (HVCOMMON?). And I'm really beginning to wonder about something. What this will do is create another block of storage which is mapped into every address space. I am curious

common area [E]CSA question / idea / idiocy

2009-05-19 Thread McKown, John
I'm reading the paper about IBM's plans for the 64-bit common (HVCOMMON?). And I'm really beginning to wonder about something. What this will do is create another block of storage which is mapped into every address space. I am curious why IBM has not considered using AR mode and a SCOPE=GLOBAL d

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:07:56 -0500, Wissink, Brad [ITSYS] wrote: >But my question is why create a 3390-1 for each of the individual data >sets, like RACF db, Jes checkpoint, etc when I can create a 3390-27 >(specifically 30015 cylinders) and use PAV's. Shouldn't that give me >the same functional

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Steve Comstock
McKown, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List * LOAD the table; R1 has address, R0 has size in doublewords * Get storage below the line using the R0 value * 8 * Copy the table to your gotten storage Kind regards, -Steve Comstock Relocate ADCONS, how?

Re: Configuring APPN using Hipersockets

2009-05-19 Thread John Au
Chris, Thanks for the info. I'll direct my attention to setting up Enterprise Extenders for both LPARs. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 11:17 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > > * LOAD the table; R1 has address, R0 has size in doublewords > * Get storage below the line using the R0 value * 8 > * Copy the table to your gotten storage > > > Kind regards, > > -Steve Comstock Relocate ADCONS, how? I'

Re: AMODE Switchingbv

2009-05-19 Thread Bill Fairchild
If you are passing the address of the LOADed table to other modules somehow, then you can do the following: LOAD the module into wherever the LOAD service chooses to put it. If the caller is mode 24, then: (1) save the length of the module, which is returned in R0 (or maybe R1; read the doc);

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Tue, 19 May 2009 10:57:43 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote: > >* LOAD the table; R1 has address, R0 has size in doublewords >* Get storage below the line using the R0 value * 8 >* Copy the table to your gotten storage > ... being careful along the way to update any relocatable internal pointers the t

Re: OAM 3995 objects

2009-05-19 Thread John Kington
Joel > We're in need of migrating our transitioned objects to a better-performing > platform than the 3995. Unfortunately OAM doesn't support transitioning > objects to (non-DB2) dasd. Our other option is our VTS. Are there any > shops that have migrated all their 3995 objects to another platfo

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Edward Jaffe
Baraniecki, Ray wrote: I cannot control where the table is loaded. Or can I? BLDL. Then "fiddle" with the AMODE. Then LOAD DE=? -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800 Los Angeles, CA 90045 310-338-0400 x318 edja...@phoenixsoftware.com http://www

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Steve Comstock
McKown, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:38 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: AMODE Switching Why can't you just LOAD the table into below-the-line storage?

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Chris Mason
Rex - and Hal Actually, it was a summary sheet, a "redtip", rather than a redbook or even a redpaper. I imagined that Hal wanted a reference indicating that OSC and OSE (or OSD) could be combined. I had a quick look in the two manuals you mentioned but couldn't find any specific statement on

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Hal Merritt
Thanks. But I see from the other replies that I was correct: OSA cards vary in their capabilities. Exactly what a given card can and cannot do depends on a number of factors. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Pommier, R

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John > Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 11:38 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: AMODE Switching > > Why can't you just LOAD the table into below-the-line storage? That >

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Baraniecki, Ray
I cannot control where the table is loaded. Or can I? Thanks, Ray Baraniecki Morgan Stanley GWMG 18th Floor 1 New York Plaza New York, NY 10004 Office - 212-276-5641 Cell - 917-597-5692 ray.baranie...@morganstaley.com BE CARBON CONSCIOUS. PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFOR

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Baraniecki, Ray
I will investigate this. Where can I find information. Thanks, Ray Baraniecki Morgan Stanley GWMG 18th Floor 1 New York Plaza New York, NY 10004 Office - 212-276-5641 Cell - 917-597-5692 ray.baranie...@morganstaley.com BE CARBON CONSCIOUS. PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFO

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 5/19/2009 9:43:03 A.M. Central Daylight Time, hmerr...@jackhenry.com writes: Can you point me to a pub number? >> I like Redbook SG24-5948. If you search _www.redbooks.ibm.com _ (http://www.redbooks.ibm.com ) you'll see a few other TIPS that include Quick starts for VM

IDCAMS - IMPORT QUESTION

2009-05-19 Thread John Dawes
Is there a way of having the NUMBER OF RECORDS PROCESSED displayed in the output of the job when an IMPORT function is performed?  The record count for the EXPORT is posted.  Here is my jcl:   //STEPC EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,REGION=2048K,COND=(0,NE) //SYSPRINT  DD   SYSOUT=*

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Baraniecki, Ray > > Help; > > I have written a called Assembler subroutine that performs a "LOAD" for a table member for COBOL > programs. My subroutine is assembled and linked with RMODE 24 and AMODE ANY and most of

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread Wissink, Brad [ITSYS]
But my question is why create a 3390-1 for each of the individual data sets, like RACF db, Jes checkpoint, etc when I can create a 3390-27 (specifically 30015 cylinders) and use PAV's. Shouldn't that give me the same functionality without having to manage a bunch of small volumes? Brad Wissink

Re: AW: AW: Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO)

2009-05-19 Thread Ken Porowski
After you made the change in CONSOLxx to LOGON(AUTO) was there a plex wide IPL? IIRC CONSOLxx definitions are plex wide so a member entering the plex will use a 'cached' version which may be different than you expect. You should be able to dynamically alter to LOGON(AUTO) then as long as CONSOLx

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Hal, Here are a couple. SA22-7990 is the OSA/ICC User's Guide, SA22-7935 is the OSA-Express customer guide and reference. I pulled these from the z/OS 1.7 document CDs so I don't have a URL for them. In addition is the Redbook that Chris pointed out. Rex -Original Message- From: IBM M

AW: AW: Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO)

2009-05-19 Thread Allan Boyles
Well, this does not seem to be the explaination to our situation. - none of the systems in the sysplex are running 1.10 yet. - LOGON(AUTO) is explicitly set for all MSCs in all the console members - the D C command shows different results regarding LOGON= when issued from different Lpars. For som

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread Tom Moulder
Terry Draper wrote: Brad, I do not think EMC have HIPERPAVs and do not know if they have committed to them and if so when. I think I would play safe for your new environment and put busy system data sets on smaller models than 27. EMC has support for HiperPAV. This has been around for

Re: AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Tom Harper
Ray, Did you read the answer I posted for you. on the assembler LISTSERV? IBM provided for this very issue with IARVSERV. Tom Harper IMS Utilities Development Team Neon Enterprise Software Sugar Land, TX - Original Message - From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu

AMODE Switching

2009-05-19 Thread Baraniecki, Ray
Help; I have written a called Assembler subroutine that performs a "LOAD" for a table member for COBOL programs. My subroutine is assembled and linked with RMODE 24 and AMODE ANY and most of the table members are linked with RMODE 31 AMODE 31. The problem arises when my subroutine is called by

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread Terry Draper
Brad,    I have seen some responses to your question, which raised questions.   I will ignore the RVA, which works differently with its virtualisation.      The latest DASD does reserve all the space for a specified volume. So allocating a 1 cylinder data set on a mod 27 would waste nearly all th

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Chris Mason
Rex > While I'm not sure what an OSE is, ... OSE seems to be defined as non-OSD! Here's your reference for OSA CHPID types: http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0088.html Actually OSN is missing, the CHPID type used to support CCL pretending to be a channel-attached 3

OAM 3995 objects

2009-05-19 Thread Joel M Ivey
We're in need of migrating our transitioned objects to a better-performing platform than the 3995. Unfortunately OAM doesn't support transitioning objects to (non-DB2) dasd. Our other option is our VTS. Are there any shops that have migrated all their 3995 objects to another platform in order t

Re: Compuware Announces Strategic Divestiture, Focus on End-to-end Application Performance

2009-05-19 Thread Tyler Allman
The DevPartner web page does include a link to Xpediter, but it's only there to provide quick access to mainframe debugging product information from the distributed debugging product section of Compuware.com. The Xpediter family of products is not part of the divestiture. Tyler Allman - X

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread Lizette Koehler
If I understand DASD correctly, our mainframe dasd is carved out of the EMC storage (or whomever) array. This dasd lays virtually across multiple disks in the storage array depending on its RAID configuration. And you may or may not use BCV or PAV. I am currently working with a DMX4500 storage a

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Hal Merritt
Can you point me to a pub number? Thanks!! -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R. Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:29 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF Hal,

Re: 64-bit Common Storage in z/OS 1.10 (HVCOMMON)

2009-05-19 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 14 May 2009 14:11:48 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: >Mark Zelden wrote: >> I don't see any mention of 64-bit common storage in the Extended >> Addressability Guide for z/OS 1.10 . It doesn't document what a 64-bit >> address space looks. Am I missing a more current manual? Or is it >> docu

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread R.S.
Hal Merritt pisze: Some (most?) OSA adapter cards cannot be used for both ICC and OSE. That is, if one port is set up as ICC, the other port is unusable. At least that is what we have been told. It's plain wrong. Gadi described the card: OSA-Express2 1000BaseT. Such card can be used as OSE a

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Pommier, Rex R.
Hal, While I'm not sure what an OSE is, I'm pretty sure that your comment about "if one port is set up as ICC, the other port is unusable" is incorrect. According to the OSA/ICC user's guide, you define an ICC as type OSC in the HCD. That being the case, we have 2 OSA-Express cards in our z9BC.

Re: AW: Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO)

2009-05-19 Thread David Waldman
ERROR DESCRIPTION: When no specific LOGON attribute has been specified on the CONSOLE statement for a console, LOGON=OPTIONAL may appear in message CNZ4100I in response to a DISPLAY CONSOLES command regardless of the LOGON attribute specified for the DEFAULT statement in CONSOLXX. This

AW: Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO)

2009-05-19 Thread Allan Boyles
Thanks - unfortunately I can't read the apar without logging in. Do you have details of the apar? Allan -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] Im Auftrag von Field, Alan C. Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Mai 2009 15:28 An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.e

Re: IBMLink broken again?

2009-05-19 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [On Behalf Of Field, Alan C. > > I can't access IBMLink through the web this morning. Any one else? Logged on about 0600 (CDT); still working fine for me. -jc-

Re: IBMLINK -- AGAIN?

2009-05-19 Thread McKown, John
I'm in too. -- John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may co

Re: IBMLINK -- AGAIN?

2009-05-19 Thread Richbourg, Claude
Works for me just fine. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Chappell Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBMLINK -- AGAIN? Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out James (Jim) Chappell

Re: IBMLINK -- AGAIN?

2009-05-19 Thread Schwartz, Alan
I'm in - first try. Alan Schwartz -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Jim Chappell Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:43 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: IBMLINK -- AGAIN? Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out James (Jim

IBMLINK -- AGAIN?

2009-05-19 Thread Jim Chappell
Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out James (Jim) Chappell 503 745-7841 503 349-5603(cell) james.chapp...@daimler.com Daimler Trucks North America LLC If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank

IBMLink broken again?

2009-05-19 Thread Field, Alan C.
I can't access IBMLink through the web this morning. Any one else? Greenscreen works, as usual. Alan -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the messa

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Hal Merritt
Some (most?) OSA adapter cards cannot be used for both ICC and OSE. That is, if one port is set up as ICC, the other port is unusable. At least that is what we have been told. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of ??? ?? ???

Re: Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO)

2009-05-19 Thread Field, Alan C.
Perhaps related to OA28541? To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO) For all the MCS consoles in a Sysplex we have the LOGON(AUTO) parameter set on all Lpars. When issuing the D C command on various Lpars the display shows "LOGON=OPTIONAL"

Re: HSM COPYTAPE ML2 Tape unit type confusion

2009-05-19 Thread Staller, Allan
Check SETSYS UNITNAME SETSYS MIGUNITNAME SETSYS TAPEMIGRATION Also check for DSN/UNIT overrides in your tape management subsystem. I would also suggest you turn on DUPLEXING, as opposed to TAPECOPY. HTH, After many years I have finally convinced management (or more nearly

Re: SMPE Rename of Module and Alias

2009-05-19 Thread Kurt Quackenbush
I am getting ready to write a usermod to rename a module that has an alias. Do you have to do a ++RENAME to both the module and then for its alias? The manual is not helping me understand that. Do you want to rename the alias as well as the load module? If you want to keep the same alias, th

Display Console message confusing in a SYSPLEX, e.g LOGON(AUTO)

2009-05-19 Thread Allan Boyles
For all the MCS consoles in a Sysplex we have the LOGON(AUTO) parameter set on all Lpars. When issuing the D C command on various Lpars the display shows "LOGON=OPTIONAL" for some systems. The display is reflected correctly for the Lpars own consoles, ie. the consoles defined on the system where th

Re: HTTP servers on z/OS

2009-05-19 Thread R.S.
Timothy Sipples pisze: The new Apache-based IBM HTTP Server for z/OS (i.e. IBM HTTP Server V7.0 for z/OS) is available at no additional charge to every z/OS customer. FMID is HHAP700. The http://www.oss4zos.org site has a good write-up on the front page: click on "Apache HTTP Server." To add to

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread R.S.
Jan MOEYERSONS pisze: On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:02:56 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote: However, if you are going to put on RACF Data Base on one Mod27 - nothing else on that volume, then some might question the waste of space. I am sure there is a balance to those issues. Not knowing the inter

Re: DSLIST VSAM support for Info line command

2009-05-19 Thread Scott T. Harder
I want to say that it was a late version of OS/390. v2.9?? v2.10?? But, I don't know for sure. All the best, Scott T. Harder On 5/18/09, David Speake wrote: > Does anyone know when the I - Info line command on DSLIST started supporting > VSAM. I have been using ISPF Workplace for nine years (a

Re: SRM CPU Mgmt Table layout?

2009-05-19 Thread Bob Woodside
On Monday 18 May 2009, Mark Zelden wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2009 08:43:56 -0400, Bob Woodside wrote: > >        Can anyone tell me where the SRM CPU Management Control > > Table (CCT) layout is documented?         [ snip ] > >        I don't really want to include examples that I can't > > documen

Re: SRM CPU Mgmt Table layout?

2009-05-19 Thread Bob Woodside
On Monday 18 May 2009, Rob Scott wrote: > SYS1.MODGEN(IRACCT)         Thanks  --  that's exactly what I was looking for; even though, as Mark pointed out a few minutes later, it's not officially considered GUPI. Cheers, Bob -- Bob Woodside Woodsway Consulting, Inc. www.woodsway.com -

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread גדי בן אבי
I've done that several times. The APPC part is active. I can even use the Java GUI Some parts, like the get_config option, work, others, like the get_oat do not. Gadi -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Tuesday, May

Re: System data sets and 3390-27

2009-05-19 Thread Jan MOEYERSONS
On Mon, 18 May 2009 16:02:56 -0400, Lizette Koehler wrote: >However, if you are going to put on RACF Data Base on one Mod27 - nothing > else on that volume, then some might question the waste of space. I am > sure there is a balance to those issues. > Not knowing the internals of that SAN thi

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread R.S.
IMHO you should review whole process of setup OSA/SF. You have to allocate *and edit* some datasets. You also have to set up APPC. At the end you have to customize and start OSASF started task. -- Radoslaw Skorupka Lodz, Poland -- BRE Bank SA ul. Senatorska 18 00-950 Warszawa www.brebank.pl S

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Fermat Ma
Can you CONFIG OFF/ON the OSA chpid? Fermat 2009/5/19 גדי בן אבי > Hi, > > > > I am having trouble configuring an OSA port using OSA/SF. > > We have OSA Express2 1000Base cards. One port is defined as ICC (OSC) and > the other as OSE. > > We would like to share the OSE port between all the LPAR

Re: HTTP servers on z/OS

2009-05-19 Thread Timothy Sipples
The new Apache-based IBM HTTP Server for z/OS (i.e. IBM HTTP Server V7.0 for z/OS) is available at no additional charge to every z/OS customer. FMID is HHAP700. The http://www.oss4zos.org site has a good write-up on the front page: click on "Apache HTTP Server." To add to the list CICS Transa

Re: Problem configuring OSA express card using OSA/SF

2009-05-19 Thread Chris Mason
Gadi This looks like a problem for IBM to solve. It was back in 2001 when I last busied myself with the use of OSA/SF for the purposes of performing configurations - as opposed to simply retrieving information from OSA storage. However I do remember spending a lot of time getting to grips with

BLOCK CONTAINS

2009-05-19 Thread Bill Klein
Actually, I don't think the Standard has "much opinion" on the entire BLOCK CONTAINS clause. The fact is that MOST existing "conforming" COBOL compilers run in environments where blocking doesn't exist any more. For most conforming compilers, this phrase is documented as "syntax checked but has n