Hi,
Is it possible to assign a service class depending on the system the job is
running on?
We are running z/OS 1.9.
TIA
Gadi
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
??? ?? ??? gad...@malam.com wrote in message
news:bba5d76fb046794fa7f01f8e02bfc1710228c...@jer-mail1.jer.ad.malam.co
m...
Hi,
Is it possible to assign a service class depending on the system the
job is running on?
We are running z/OS 1.9.
TIA
Gadi
The
Is it possible to assign a service class depending on the system the job is
running on?
Yes.
SI/SIG
System Instance (Group)
We are running z/OS 1.9.
Been around since OS/390, IIRC.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
how about by Qualifier Type SSC, or Subsystem Collection Name, in
Classification Rule for JES.
2009/5/27 גדי בן אבי gad...@malam.com
Hi,
Is it possible to assign a service class depending on the system the job is
running on?
We are running z/OS 1.9.
TIA
Gadi
The Classification Rules are run when the job enters the system, so the
Service class is already defined when job starts executing.
Incorrect.
You can use System Instance, or System Instance Group in the classificatio
section, by sub-system.
At my last shop, we did it to encourage TSO users
Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote in message
news:471434171-1243413448-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-4713
484...@bxe1305.bisx.prod.on.blackberry...
The Classification Rules are run when the job enters the system, so
the Service class is already defined when job starts executing.
My bad.
It's SY -- System Name
And SYG -- System Name Group.
I double checked the manual -- should have done that beforehand.
Sorry! (8-{[}
--Original Message--
From: (yahoo) Ted MacNEIL
Sender: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
ReplyTo: IBM Mainframe
Yes, but still the SC is determined when the job is submitted, not when the
job starts to run on one of the systems of the MAS. And that is what Gadi
asked, dependent on where the job runs.
Depends on the job type, and whether you are using WLM-Managed INITs or not.
TSO, STC, ASCH, all support
I have yet another mystifying situation. When I run my transaction online, I
get a U0476. When I run it under BTS, is happily blows right by the same
code (crashes later, but Ill work on that later.)
It crashes on this:
CALL CEETDLI USING GHU - and yes, I have tried CBLTDLI, no
difference
When you are running this with BTS, are you ALSO using an interactive
language-specific debugger, e.g. Xpediter, Debug-Tool, or similar. (They all
have ways of running with BTS). If so, then I would trace when/how those
fields are getting correctly filled in under BTS in the program logic - and
Now, see???... THAT is a great piece of information! I *hate*
those damn numbers always having to do NUM OFF and many times
having (or just wanting) to clear the numbers off the end (just
because it seems cleaner to me (i'm a bit anal that way). But,
now I know the origin and that
I've heard many stories about card decks being
dropped every which-way, but what did you have to do when that
happened?
If you were smart, the first step of every job that required card input was a
sort to insure the cards were in proper order. It didn't matter when they were
dropped as
On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 08:18 -0400, Bob Shannon wrote:
If you were smart, the first step of every job that required card
input was a sort to insure the cards were in proper order. It didn't
matter when they were dropped as long as the cards weren't damaged and
all of the cards were picked up.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) writes:
We used to joke about how IBM found a way to get rid of all their olld
96-column stock. In Canada (I don't know if
OK, that was all I needed, thanks. I put displays in around everything that
even touched the PCB, and I found the program that was horking it up.
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Bill Klein
Sent: Wednesday, May 27,
If you were smart, the first step of every job that required card input was a
sort to insure the cards were in proper order.
It didn't matter when they were dropped as long as the cards weren't damaged
and all of the cards were picked up.
I didn't always perform the sort, but I always
Very early on I got into the habit of diagonally marking (the edge of) decks
with a texta.
Just in case.
It took my first time dropping a deck to learn to do that.
I didn't have to be told twice. (8-{]}
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
On Wed, 27 May 2009 08:29:34 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Is it possible to assign a service class depending on the system the job
is running on?
Yes.
Possibly (more below). Definitely NO in a shared spool (MAS).
SI/SIG
System Instance (Group)
That is subsystem instance
As an early day hacker in college, me and a few buddies took a card and
punched every hole out, then reproduced that card till we had a few
decks, then put one deck in the keypunch machine to reproduce, another
deck in each sorting machine and each printer in the room. Started them
all
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:36 PM, Phil Smith III li...@akphs.com wrote:
The following is typical output found in the SYSMSG produced by a batch job
on our z/OS 1.9 system:
-STEPNAME PROCSTEP RC EXCP CONN TCB SRB CLOCK SERV
-NNN1SW 00 2326 1195 200.44 .00
In a message dated 5/27/2009 7:12:53 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
scottyt.har...@gmail.com writes:
because it seems cleaner to me (i'm a bit anal that way). But,
now I know the origin and that changes everything.
Well in the olden days when you dropped the deck(unprinted) it was
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Joseph H Winterton jose...@us.ibm.com wrote:
As an early day hacker in college, me and a few buddies took a card and
punched every hole out, then reproduced that card till we had a few
decks, then put one deck in the keypunch machine to reproduce, another
After I read the quoted text, I kept thinking that the system 3 had 2 rows
of 45 columns. I finally remembered that what I was thinking of was the
Univac punched card. It was the same size as an 80 column card, but had 2
rows of 45 columns, and the holes in the card were round.
My first job
Jennifer,
There are many sites doing something similar with FlashCopy on HDS and IBM,
Shadowimage on HDS, Snapshot on SUN, and Snap on EMC. However, because you
are using EMC in system copy you really need to limit your scope to EMC's
Snap and the products that support it.
Experience with other
On 23 May 2009 12:32:09 -0700, paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin)
wrote:
You seem to be agreeing with Steve Thompson that In the MVS world, we
are not device dependant, only insofar as there is only one type of
device. A weak assertion indeed. Would you be willing to go so far
as to side
Back in my days as a trainee operator, dropping a tray (remember those
grey trays of 2000 or so cards?) was known as a 'floor sort'.
AT Another place I worked at had the only 2540 I've ever seen. ISTR a
program that validated data cards 'on the fly', sending valid cards to
output hopper 1 and
Yesterday, I didn't get any emails from IBM-Main until about 5:30 P.M. CST.
Did anyone else have any problems? I went to the web site, and saw that
there were postings. This morning, I had the normal amount of emails from
IBM-Main.
Eric
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
Milwaukee,
On 25 May 2009 18:23:38 -0700, joa...@swbell.net (John McKown) wrote:
I agree, except for truly direct access data sets. What I have fought
with here is the mindset of I must allocate in CYLINDERS in order to be
efficient. I want them to allocate in RECORDS (or millions of records).
But, oh,
I agree with Mark Zelden. When we looked at trying to find a way to put
development batch in a different service class than production batch,
when it runs on a different system in the sysplex but uses exactly the
same job name (for testing - same in test as in production), we ended up
with this
However, SY is not valid for a JOB, which is what the OP requested.
I went back to the manual and checked.
You are correct, but with my bad eyesight, I had to download the PDF and rotate
the table on page 72, to figure it out.
There has to be a better way to present that than a table rotated 90
The computer science professor soon arrived to stop the stress test of the
machines. ;-)
Somebody tried that at the University of Waterloo and was expelled for
sabotaging expensive (and old equipment).
Universities, in Ontario at least, are/were not well funded.
I almost got expelled for
Diehl, Gary gary.di...@allstate.com wrote in message
news:448c07246fdb244e86554e7f2c6ee7a904f42...@a0116-xpo0114-s.swdc.ad.a
llstate.com...
I agree with Mark Zelden. When we looked at trying to find a way to
put
development batch in a different service class than production batch,
when it
As for sorting dropped cards: in the mid-80s, I worked at UofWaterloo.
We had one full professor who refused to get off of cards.
I think I know who that was.
On a related note, at one Insurance Company I worked at, we had one of the most
prestigious pension plans in North America.
It was
Another I didn't mention before could be to use automation or the
IWMRESET WLM API to change the service class after the job is running.
ISTR some examples in MVS Update (Xephon) or one of the other pubs to
do this.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich
And of course, people cut and paste their SORTWK* files often without thinking.
We made it even more turnkey than that.
We cleaned up all the Production JCL, and made them dynamic.
After all, they are temporary anyway, make them all very, very large and we
won't be called in.
With SYNCSORT,
Another I didn't mention before could be to use automation or the IWMRESET WLM
API to change the service class after the job is running.
Hey, Rube!
Can you say 'Goldberg'?
Sometimes, the job runs so quickly that it's not worth the effort.
You can set up Service Class by Transaction (Job)
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
ibm-m...@tpg.com.au (Shane) writes:
So long as it wasn't an object deck.
Very early on I got into the habit of diagonally marking (the edge of)
decks with a
On Wed, 27 May 2009 14:13:08 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
It is valid for TSO, STC, OMVS, ASCH, SAP, and TCP (I think that is the
entire list).
If SYSH is SAP, which I don't believe it is, then yes except for TCP.
It is not the same as SAP.
The table indicates that it is not.
On Wed, 27 May 2009 08:45:06 -0500, Eric Bielefeld eric-
ibmm...@wi.rr.com wrote:
...
By the way, for the 96 column card, did each row go from left to
right, or on one row did the columns go from right to left? I was
just thinking that when you punched a 96 column card in a
keypunch, it would
Actually in a fairly/good/large implementation of test data privacy the numbers
don't seem to be unreasonable (but there are a number of factors that need to
be looked at. (i.e ONLY DB2 data, or MVS/Oracle/VSAM as well, instead of?).
Also a number of differnet aspects need to be.
An example.
Yes, I had the same problem. I didn't know why it was happening, so I
resubscribed. Today everything seems back to normal.
Dave Salt
SimpList(tm) - try it; you'll get it!
http://www.mackinney.com/products/SIM/simplist.htm
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009
It's interesting to me that I am seeing a couple of references to the
80's (albeit early 80's) in some of these posts related to punched
cards. I started in 1984 at ATT in Orlando (in I/O Distribution)
and saw nary a punched card. I guess it depends on where you were.
--
All the best,
Scott
It's interesting to me that I am seeing a couple of references to the 80's
(albeit early 80's) in some of these posts related to punched cards.
I started in 1984 at ATT in Orlando (in I/O Distribution) and saw nary a
punched card.
I guess it depends on where you were.
Three years can make a big
All,
Here's a curiosity question, which I haven't found a satisfactory answer
for in the help panels or the manual.
On z/OS 1.10 in RMF III, looking at the PU/PROCU panel, and adding up
the Time on CP% : Total column, which is supposed to contain the
percent of the CPU used by the task during
I started mainframes in 1988, and worked punch cards until 1991. I even
had the glorious experience of a multi-file floor sort exercise,
thankfully the cards all had sequence numbers so all I had to do was run
them through the interpreter, and then put them back in sequence by
hand. The sequence
Hmm - I didn't do anything - the postings just started up again. I'm
surprised no one else had this problem.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
414-475-7434
- Original Message -
From: Dave Salt ds...@hotmail.com
Yes, I had the same problem. I didn't know
On 27 May 2009 07:32:20 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
As for sorting dropped cards: in the mid-80s, I worked at UofWaterloo.
We had one full professor who refused to get off of cards.
I think I know who that was.
On a related note, at one Insurance Company I worked at, we had one
We still had our reader/punch until the end of 1995. I don't think we used
it at all the last year. It finally took moving the datacenter to get rid
of it.
I do remember one time when they still used a lot of punched cards in the
factory for picking tickets etc. when the punch broke. We
On 25 May 2009 19:16:25 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of John McKown
Sent: Monday, May 25, 2009 6:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: BLOCK CONTAINS
On Sat, 23 May
It's interesting to me that I am seeing a couple of references to the
80's (albeit early 80's) in some of these posts related to punched
cards. I started in 1984 at ATT in Orlando (in I/O Distribution)
and saw nary a punched card. I guess it depends on where you were.
I can think of only
We still had our reader/punch until the end of 1995. I don't think we used
it at all the last year. It finally took moving the datacenter to get rid
of it.
One of the independent tax accountants in Connecticut was still using
a Univac 9300 (sort of a 360/20 clone, after a few beers) to run
Regarding dropped decks, I don't remember if there was a high
speed sorter for the 96 column cards. (There probably was one,
but I don't think I ever saw it.) There was a card sort/merge
program for the MOd 20 + MFCM so I assume there was also one
for the S/3 + MFCU.
I do not think there
Can someone please explain why adding the total column isn't yielding a
multiple of 100?
Welcome to Capacity Planning 101.
And, I don't mean that disparagingly.
This phenomenon has been observed for aeons.
There is hardware measurement and there is software measurement.
First, the simple one:
Scott T. Harder wrote:
Now, see???... THAT is a great piece of information! I *hate*
those damn numbers always having to do NUM OFF and many times
having (or just wanting) to clear the numbers off the end (just
because it seems cleaner to me (i'm a bit anal that way). But,
now I
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
scottyt.har...@gmail.com (Scott T. Harder) writes:
VBG. Too funny. I've heard many stories about card decks being
dropped every which-way, but what did you
When I was a systems programmer at ADR, we had one programmer with the bad
habit of resting his box of punch cards on the 1403
BTDT.
Not me, personally.
But, I didn't have to read the rest of the post to figure out what happened.
Also, a note on chad.
We used to go around to the key punches
Is there a place to get ONLY the JRE? I find only the SDK on the IBM site,
and it's way more code than I need or want.
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:55 PM, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.comwrote:
Good catch... I didn't even notice is said 10M and not 10G. My default
is 10G so my mind just saw
The planning documents state that CICS TS 3.1 is supported in z/OS R10.
What do we do about the JAVA requirements? CICS TS 3.1 only supports
Java 4 and Java 4 is no longer orderable.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
it is a free upgrade to go to CICS TS 3.2 from 3.1 -
but a few things may have to be upgraded along with CICS, like vendor
products and maybe some user written programs.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Gee, Norman
Sent:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gee, Norman
The planning documents state that CICS TS 3.1 is supported in z/OS
R10.
What do we do about the JAVA requirements? CICS TS 3.1 only supports
Java 4 and Java 4 is no longer orderable.
It appears you can
Hello all, I'm working on a user exit and the MQ intercommunication book
has the following:
Exits must free any storage obtained, or ensure that it will be freed by
a subsequent exit invocation.
For storage that is to persist between invocations, use the z/OS STORAGE
service; there is no
I think the answer is no.
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/software/java/products/
This Web site is the definitive source of information for the z/OS Java
products. It should be consulted for the latest on content, availability and
service levels.
The above site only lists SDK's.
Look up the STORAGE macro in the Assembler Services Reference, It
provides services similar to GETMAIN/FREEMAIN, but via a PC routine as
opposed to an SVC.
===
Wayne Driscoll
OMEGAMON DB2 L3 Support/Development
wdrisco(AT)us.ibm.com
I had the same experience. The first post I saw was at 3PM PDT.
Linda Mooney
- Original Message -
From: Eric Bielefeld eric-ibmm...@wi.rr.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 10:44:37 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: IBM-Main Postings Yesterday
STORAGE is IBM's recommended successor to GETMAIN/FREEMAIN, which are both
still supported. See MVS PROGRAMMING: Assembler Services Reference, Volume 2
(IARR2V-XCTLX), aka SA22-7607.
Bill Fairchild
Software Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel:
Ted,
Thanks! After I hit SEND, I had a fleeting wonder if I'd just asked a
really dumb question [again]! I'd considered capture ratio, but
dismissed the idea because I thought our capture ratio was =90%. I
guess it's lower than that!
I appreciate your well thought out explanation.
Best
On Wed, 27 May 2009 18:22:22 +, Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
When I was a systems programmer at ADR, we had one
programmer with the bad habit of resting his box of punch cards on the
1403
BTDT.
...
Or, ... On the the punch side of the 2540 there was a little platform
about 1
Thanks! After I hit SEND, I had a fleeting wonder if I'd just asked a really
dumb question [again]!
There are no dumb questions; just dumb answers!
I'd considered capture ratio, but dismissed the idea because I thought our
capture ratio was =90%.
I want to see a system that high!
Your 83% is
Mike Ward wrote:
I would like to use the persistent storage between invocations, but I
can't seem to find anything on the z/OS STORAGE service.
If this is an MQ Client Channel Exit You need to be very careful how you
obtain, pass, and release storage.
Will You be passing the address of the
Yup. Chad looked like fun. At that age we didn't think much about it, but
those things had VERY sharp corners.
Not good in eyes.
Yes! That's one reason I realised I was a twit.
We hurt somebody.
Stupid is as stupid does!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
I had the same problem and did exactly what Dave did and everything is now back
to normal.
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
Asia/Pacific representatives for
Innovation Data Processing, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Passing just to itself via a STCM R1,B'',MQCXP_EXITDATA at exit
init time. Then I plan to release it at exit termination time. I haven't
figured out how I can continue to reuse it over and over between
different invocations.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Greetings!
I too had the problem, did nothing at all, now back to normal
Linda Mooney
- Original Message -
From: Stephen Mednick ibmm...@css.au.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:47:10 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: IBM-Main Postings
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Mark Pace wrote:
Is there a place to get ONLY the JRE? I find only the SDK on the IBM site,
and it's way more code than I need or want.
I'm curious as to why? It's not as if the JRE were any freer. I've never
seen only the JRE packaged for z/OS.
--
Trying to write
Because the SDK is HUGE with allow the documentation, sample apps, etc...
The JRE usually is much smaller.
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 3:58 PM, John McKown joa...@swbell.net wrote:
On Wed, 27 May 2009, Mark Pace wrote:
Is there a place to get ONLY the JRE? I find only the SDK on the IBM
site,
This probably didn't affect everyone in the same way, but I happened to notice
in my mail server log, many of these:
2009-05-26 15:45:22.241356500 tcpserver: ok 1328
mars3::::192.168.1.243:25 bama.ua.edu::::130.160.4.114::35469
2009-05-26 15:45:22.241719500 rblsmtpd: 130.160.4.114
Count yourself lucky how you learned about that. When I was a
systems programmer at ADR, we had one programmer with the bad
habit of resting his box of punch cards on the 1403; it was
conveniently next to the card reader, and a comfortable height.
He persisted in this habit despite
A majority of our disk data sets that were not in use were deleted as a result.
We had a similar situation.
The datasets were backed up, but we didn't have HSM, FDR, ASM2, or anything
like that.
A non-programmer storage analyst (and I use the term loosely), had written an
EZYTREV programme to
On Wed, 27 May 2009 19:41:14 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Thanks! After I hit SEND, I had a fleeting wonder if I'd just asked a
really dumb question [again]!
There are no dumb questions; just dumb answers!
I'd considered capture ratio, but dismissed the idea because I thought
I investigated the Storage macro and it seems to work just like the
getmain and freemain macros. If you have any expertise in selecting
persistent storage, I'm more than happy to listen. It seems there are 4
types of storage. Task, job step, address space, and system. I was
thinking that job step
On Mon, 25 May 2009 19:13:43 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
OK, but how is this desire not satisfied via AVGREC allocations? Oh, it
is and you'll claim your applications folks can't handle the concept.
AVGREC is:
o Woefully misleading; it seems to abbreviate AVeraGe RECord size,
with which it
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 1:53 PM, William Donzelli wdonze...@gmail.com wrote:
I can think of only one tiny shop in Ohio that still uses punch cards,
although very rarely (once a month?). Any others?
My dad used punch cards until he died in 2006. Of course, he carried
them in his shirt pocket as
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 2:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: z/OS STORAGE service
Passing just to itself via a STCM R1,B'',MQCXP_EXITDATA at exit
init time.
2009/5/27 Ward, Mike S mw...@ssfcu.org:
I investigated the Storage macro and it seems to work just like the
getmain and freemain macros. If you have any expertise in selecting
persistent storage, I'm more than happy to listen. It seems there are 4
types of storage. Task, job step, address
There was also the 129 Data Recorder which buffered your card data
before punching it.
Don't forget the 96 column cards used on system/3
Ken G.
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I remember 80-column punch cards. I don't remember the model of the keypunch machine, but I do
SHOULD YOU MOVE APPS ON OR OFF THE MAINFRAME TO CUT COSTS?
http://go.techtarget.com/r/7192091/6570353
Wayne Kernochan, Contributor
As IT seeks to cut costs in the face of declining budgets by every
means possible, the mainframe now appears to be a likely source of
cost savings and a likely target
Don't forget the 96 column cards used on system/3
This was already discussed.
I haven't forgotten; I just never used them.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Yeah... understood. So much changed so fast; and continues to do so.
On 5/27/09, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
It's interesting to me that I am seeing a couple of references to the 80's
(albeit early 80's) in some of these posts related to punched cards.
I started in 1984 at ATT in
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:23 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: BLOCK CONTAINS
On Mon, 25 May 2009 19:13:43 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote:
OK, but how is
Wayne Driscoll/Chicago/i...@ibmus wrote on 05/27/2009 03:30:23 PM:
Look up the STORAGE macro in the Assembler Services Reference, It
provides services similar to GETMAIN/FREEMAIN, but via a PC routine as
opposed to an SVC.
SVC and branch entry to VSM services are available via the
STORAGE
Delays in GSIS processing traced to IBM glitch
If you are a retired government employee or a pensioner experiencing delays in
the processing of your money claims, do not blame the Government Service
Insurance System (GSIS) management staff.
Read the story at
91 matches
Mail list logo
