John,
The first value is the traditional SRM busy calculation from CPU wait time.
This is accurate for LPARs with dedicated processors, but with shared
processors as an LPAR's LP approach their weights in a CEC that is 100% busy
the LP often loses control of the CP before it goes into a wait. CPU
If you have done SMP/E apply against both target zones, then there is
no guaranteed fix.
For example, if there are members in MTS or STS that both target zones
think they "own", ACCEPTing the maintenance in one zone will move those
members into the appropriate DZONE DLIBs and remove them from MTS
On 03/15/2010 11:30 AM, Rabbe, Luke wrote:
> The SMP/E User's Guide states:
> ...each SCDS is directly related to a specific target zone, and each target
> zone must have its own SCDS.
> It also says this about the MTS, STS, and LTS.
> Why is that? I have a couple SMP/E environments with multiple
John,
Read it as "100 percent of 60 percent of the physical capacity of the box." It
is likely you have some slack in the other LPAR due to LPAR weight management.
Dave Barry
Sr. Performance & Capacity Planning Analyst
United Parcel Service
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discu
Dana,
Not sure I can help, but here are some questions that come to my mind as a
former IBI Tech Specialist:
When you say "starting to run a really long time," does that mean suddenly or
progressively over time?
Are you running FOCUS interactively (TSO) or from a remote client? Does your
j
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:38:00 -0500, McKown, John
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
>> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:19 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
>> Subject: Re: IBM And Microsoft
Only the SMP* type datasets name.
Lizette
>
>Thank you for offering to help. What information are you looking for in the
>DDDEF listings? I ask because it could be hundreds of lines of output to look
>at.
>
>Luke
>
>
>Can you provide a DDDEF list from your global, tlib, and dlib environmen
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:18:43 -0500, Rabbe, Luke
wrote:
>I only have one CSI that contains all zones. The SMP SCDS, LTS, MTS, and
STS are the same for all target zones. Each target zone has its own target
libraries.
>
>Do any of these details change your assessment?
>
>I have a production and te
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:18:43 -0500, Rabbe, Luke wrote:
>I only have one CSI that contains all zones. The SMP SCDS, LTS, MTS, and STS
>are the same for all target zones. Each target zone has its own target
>libraries.
>
>Do any of these details change your assessment?
>
>I have a production and
SDSF DA is showing CPU 100 / 60. This z/OS is in a Group Capacity situation
with another LPAR. The CEC is rated at 47 MSU. The Group Capacity is set at 38
MSU. 38/47 is .8085. The LPAR utilization from BMC Mainview is showing 60% cpu
for this LPAR and 24.5% for the other LPAR. That is 84.5% busy
On 2010-03-15 at 04:33 concerning "Creating Unit of work for WLM
based on Plan/Package...", ITschak Mugzach wrote
to IBM-Main :
> We would like to prioritize DB2 tasks based on CICS transaction
> importance. [snip] wonder if the unit of work can be priorities by WLM
> based on plan name or eve
Thank you for offering to help. What information are you looking for in the
DDDEF listings? I ask because it could be hundreds of lines of output to look
at.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lizette Koehler
Sent: M
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 2:19 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>
> In , on 03/15/2010
>at 1
Can you provide a DDDEF list from your global, tlib, and dlib environments?
That would help us to understand your environment better.
Lizette
>
>I only have one CSI that contains all zones. The SMP SCDS, LTS, MTS, and STS
>are the same for all target zones. Each target zone has its own targ
In , on 03/15/2010
at 10:48 AM, Anne & Lynn Wheeler said:
>IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
>http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223800165
Does this mean that microsoft has stopped signing restrictive contracts
with hardware ven
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 2:36 PM, McKown, John wrote:
>
> I'm very glad. I dislike authorization codes because they are a pain in the
> butt for me to administer. But, due to greedy fools, they are a necessity. I
> wish it was possible to terminate their contract and refuse to license any
> softwar
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:32:13 +0200, Itschak Mugzach wrote:
>transaction. I wonder if the unit of work can be priorities by WLM based on
>plan name or even package. Enclave is not a must, but if Natural can
>create one for each transaction it will be even better. So, to my
>question, is this poss
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 07:22:01 -0400, Lizette Koehler
wrote:
>Yes, that is correct.
>
>I currently do not have DFS, NFS or SMB active in my environment. So I
>would need something like FTP to get it into the Unix on z/OS. Of course I
>am assuming that I would need to load the PDF on the Unix syst
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kirk Talman
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 1:27 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Real CPU Id
>
> In the early 1990s, a company with datacenters in multiple
> locations had
In the early 1990s, a company with datacenters in multiple locations had a
popular piece of software I was working on. They had paid for it in one
location. That location sent copies of the install tape to other
locations.
They then called regularly for a "temp auth code" which they sent to e
I only have one CSI that contains all zones. The SMP SCDS, LTS, MTS, and STS
are the same for all target zones. Each target zone has its own target
libraries.
Do any of these details change your assessment?
I have a production and test target zone. Can I ACCEPT, delete the test target
zon
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Rabbe, Luke
wrote:
>The SMP/E User's Guide states:
>
>...each SCDS is directly related to a specific target zone, and each target
zone must have its own SCDS.
>
>It also says this about the MTS, STS, and LTS.
>
>Why is that? I have a couple SMP/E environments
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:29:20 -0500, Rabbe, Luke wrote:
>The SMP/E User's Guide states:
>
>...each SCDS is directly related to a specific target zone, and each target
>zone must have its own SCDS.
>
>It also says this about the MTS, STS, and LTS.
>
>Why is that? I have a couple SMP/E environments
paulgboul...@aim.com (Paul Gilmartin) writes:
> How many vendors might a customer need to call to get
> running on a Disaster Recovery site? Are the DR CPUs
> pre-keyed?
>
> Gossip, unsubstantiated: Several years ago when some music
> publishers experimented with copy-protected CDs, they observed
Hi
I think you can use the plan name as WLM classification rule.
Itschak Mugzach wrote:
We would like to prioritize DB2 tasks based on CICS transaction importance.
How ever, we use SAG Natural under CICS so we have only one CICS defined
transaction. I wonder if the unit of work can be priori
The SMP/E User's Guide states:
...each SCDS is directly related to a specific target zone, and each target
zone must have its own SCDS.
It also says this about the MTS, STS, and LTS.
Why is that? I have a couple SMP/E environments with multiple target zones and
only one set of SMP/E datasets.
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 03:00:50 -0600, Phil Kingston
wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>We are trying to get a number of new products with VTAM applications
>installed on our test system and get access to them fro our session manager
>running on the production system.
>
>If we define the ACB on the test system and a
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 10:24:04 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
>On 3/15/2010 4:44 AM, R.S. wrote:
>> This is good moment to praise one vendor: IBM!
>> IBM does not use any codes.
>
>I have mixed feelings about that. When maintaining software,
>that's great, but as a stockholder I can't wonder how
HSEND DELVOL xx DUMP(PURGE LASTCOPY))
Check the manual for exact spelling of lastcopy.
HTH,
Caution DUMP and BACKUP are 2 very different functions in dfHSM. Be sure of
what you are referring to!
I have noticed that there are several backup tapes of non existant DASD
which are still held
2010/3/15 Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
>I have mixed feelings about that. When maintaining software, that's great, but
>as a stockholder I can't wonder how much money IBM loses due to that policy. I
>expect that it sends lawyers after bigger violators, and ignores the really
>tiny fish, but how m
I don't remember how many models or other features there were to choose from,
but in ca. September 1996 I bought a new one from IBM for $30,000. It did its
DASD I/O reeal slw and had an awesome instruction processing rate
of about 2 MIPS. Which was all I needed at that time.
Bill
Good Day To All,
I have noticed that there are several backup tapes of non existant DASD
which are still held on by DFHSM. In order to release these tapes from HSM
control would a RECYCLE of the tapes do the trick? If not, could you suggest
another alternative?
Thanks.
On 15 Mar 2010 07:34:16 -0700, stars...@mindspring.com (Lizette
Koehler) wrote:
>We use Extreme Dialog for forming the bill, but that is done on Windows.
>
>So the bills come up from windows where Extreme can do the transformation to
>print.
Windows doesn't have Partitioned Data.
--
Gerhard Postpischil pisze:
On 3/15/2010 4:44 AM, R.S. wrote:
This is good moment to praise one vendor: IBM!
IBM does not use any codes.
I have mixed feelings about that. When maintaining software, that's
great, but as a stockholder I can't wonder how much money IBM loses due
to that policy.
I read the article and am confused. In India, does IBM require zSeries hardware
be purchased with z/OS? Or is it like back in the S/360 days and z/OS is
"free"? Or do the competitors want IBM to port z/OS to run on their platform?
Or to allow z/OS to run on an emulator (like Hercules/390 or that
Yes they still do ( but not every year)
I know of one audit going on this month at a customer.
As you said, nothing peculiar, it is just to make sure everything is correct
I personally prefer such a system than a system with keys.
Bruno Sugliani
zxnetconsult(at)free(dot)fr
On Mon, 15 Mar 2
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
IBM And Microsoft Clash Over Unbundling Policy
http://www.informationweek.com/news/global-cio/interviews/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=223800165
from above:
Column
>> This is good moment to praise one vendor: IBM!
>> IBM does not use any codes.
>I have mixed feelings about that. When maintaining software, that's great, but
>as a stockholder I >can't wonder how much money IBM loses due to that policy
When I worked at an insurance company 20 years ago IBM us
We use Extreme Dialog for forming the bill, but that is done on Windows.
So the bills come up from windows where Extreme can do the transformation to
print.
However, this is after this process, when the printing is done, some of the
images get rejected. It is those images that need to be repri
On 3/15/2010 4:44 AM, R.S. wrote:
This is good moment to praise one vendor: IBM!
IBM does not use any codes.
I have mixed feelings about that. When maintaining software,
that's great, but as a stockholder I can't wonder how much money
IBM loses due to that policy. I expect that it sends lawye
On 13 Mar 2010 16:56:57 -0800, stars...@mindspring.com (Lizette
Koehler) wrote:
>I have been asked if it is possible to take a PDF and load it on the
>Mainframe for printing.
I'm curious - where did the PDF come from, if you are moving it to the
Mainframe?
--
In a message dated 3/15/2010 6:22:08 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
stars...@mindspring.com writes:
currently do not have DFS, NFS or SMB active in my environment. So I
would need something like FTP to get it into the Unix on z/OS. Of course I
am assuming that I would need to load the PDF on
At the very least there should be a C/C++ PARM= or #pragma option (NOT one
of the LE "slash" options) to disable this behavior. (Maybe there is?
Someone? I didn't find it.)
I guess I am going to have to implement the workaround of reversing the
ridiculous "if-all-uppercase-then-lowercase-it" logic
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler
> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 8:16 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Loading PDF files and Pringing them on Mainframe
>
> We are currently using INFOPRINT 41
>This is good moment to praise one vendor: IBM!
>IBM does not use any codes.
That was one of my points!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...
Yes, that is correct.
I currently do not have DFS, NFS or SMB active in my environment. So I
would need something like FTP to get it into the Unix on z/OS. Of course I
am assuming that I would need to load the PDF on the Unix system in z/OS
before anything else could happen.
There is also a pot
Hit to all,
I traed the "head /dev/random | od -x", it returns me something like this :
00
...
...
004220
004240
I changed the hexa values to .
A follow-up question: what software do you have driving your InfoPrint 4100
printer currently? May I assume PSF, for example? (V4R2?)
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
IBM Consulting Enterprise Architect for
New, Advanced, and/or Innovative Solutions (VCT)
Based in Singapore & Serving the "Growth Markets"
Hi
If soemone has some performance comparsion, on z9 or z10 , between HEX
and binary (IEEE) floating point operations
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards,
Miklos SZIGETVARI
Research and Development
ISIS Information Systems GmbH
Alter Wienerweg 12, A-2344 Maria Enzersdorf, Austria
T: +4
Ted MacNEIL pisze:
Now days most just look at the 5 digit serial number - and most will also work for a short time even if the CPU serial number is wrong.
Whenever we did an upgrade, we always had the following issues:
1. Key management is inconsistant between vendors.
And, sometime, between
We would like to prioritize DB2 tasks based on CICS transaction importance.
How ever, we use SAG Natural under CICS so we have only one CICS defined
transaction. I wonder if the unit of work can be priorities by WLM based on
plan name or even package. Enclave is not a must, but if Natural can
crea
51 matches
Mail list logo
