Hi
Message 'IKJ56861I FILE AAA NOT FREED, DATA SET IS OPEN' is received for
command FREE FI(AAA).
File AAA is a ISPF table library. The table library was open and closed
using
ISPEXEC TBOPEN TAB1 WRITE LIBRARY(AAA)
ISPEXEC TBCLOSE TAB1 LIBRARY(AAA)
The FREE command was issued
Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov wrote in message
news:d7d6aecb674795469330825806700780113a0fe...@exchange.calpers.ca.gov
...
Thanks Brian and Bill,
That was very useful information and covers the suspend / resume
aspect.
I hope that somebody will be able to address the cache
You can try tso free all command
Iyi calism
Hi Al Chu,
You can try tso free all command
Iyi calismalar, Saygilar / Regards
Kayhan Tanriverir
Vizyon BT
Uzman Sistem Programcisi / Senior Systems Programmer
From: Al Chu al_chu...@optusnet.com.au
To:
On 5/1/2010 12:00 AM, John Norgauer wrote:
Is there any software available that will show the access by dataset(or by
CCHR) for a given volume?
John Norgauer
Senior Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Services
University of California Davis Medical Center
2315 Stockton Blvd
ASB
You can try tso free all command
Still won't work if the file is open.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 09:23:47 +, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
wrote:
Kayhan Tanriverir wrote:
You can try tso free all command
Not recommended. You may or may not be able to continue your session.
Still won't work if the file is open.
Of course! See in first post in this thread this
Slightly OT I'm afraid, but does anyone know if there is a 64 bit version of
Xmit
Manager? I no longer have a 32 bit Windows available (talk about dead media!).
The home website seems to have gone and it won't install from an old (months)
download. I want to look inside file 172 to find the
On Thu, 6 May 2010 17:00:12 +1000 Al Chu al_chu...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
:Message 'IKJ56861I FILE AAA NOT FREED, DATA SET IS OPEN' is received for
:command FREE FI(AAA).
:File AAA is a ISPF table library. The table library was open and closed
:using
:ISPEXEC TBOPEN TAB1 WRITE LIBRARY(AAA)
Hi Binyamin
TBOPEN and TBOPEN have RC=0. FREE FI(AAA) doesn't work once TBOPEN and
TBCLOSE on the table were executed.
If I backout to the READY mode then run ISPF and FREE FI(AAA) before running
TBOPEN/TBCLOSE, the FREE FI works.
I suspect that ISPF opens the file when TBOPEN is issued and keep
From the ISPF manual :
IKJ56861I FILE ddname NOT FREED, DATA SET IS OPEN
If the LIBRARY parameter is used with a table service, the user is not
able to free the ddname for the table library pointed to
Sorry
'TBOPEN and TBOPEN have RC=0.' should read 'TBOPEN and TBCLOSE have RC=0.'
AL
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Al Chu
Sent: Thursday, 6 May 2010 8:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF table library cannot
I have a situation where a CLIST is being interpreted as a REXX. This is
only happening on one LPAR out of 5
So on the other systems the CLIST is executed correctly - on the one it is
being interpreted as a REXX.
At first I thought it was due to the CLIST being on the EXEC DD. However, I
Thanks Paul for the information. I was suspecting that but didn't look up
the manual. :(
I was trying to use various tables by realloating different table datasets
to the same table DD name without changing 'supplied rexx' which contains
TBOPEN/TBCLOSE.
It seems not possible now.
Thanks heaps
Been seeing many comments about migrating from HFS to zFS and one
comment had the statement of the performance boost (heard it at SHARE)
coming in z/OS V1R11. Indeed this is true for where one will see it (too
lengthy
to explain here). Yes, there were many zFS sessions I attended at the last
Did you check the archives? There was a thread on this within the last month or
two. I thinlk it concluded the install won't work however if you copy the .exe
it will run.
- Original Message -
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Kees,
I believe that is a GDPS requirement, or perhaps specific to IBM. Excluding
GDPS, with HDS it is preferable to have CFW turned on.
HDS honors the intent of CFW, which is to write a Cache copy only and no NVS
copy. With CFW turned on writes to SORTWK datasets use 50% less cache than
DFW
All,
Apologies to the many non UK based IBM Mainers...But I know many UK
people lurk here..
Due to the fact that we have only received 12 confirmed attendees I have
decided to postpone the Large Systems meeting on the 12th May 2010 at CA in
Slough.
I will work with the rest of the team
Jim,
My understanding is that zfs's that you do not want to be sysplex aware
(sysplex=on in the IOEFSPRM member) should be owned on a separate lpar
that is not sysplex aware. (ie, the default in IOEFSPRM). So that is how you
would keep them from being moved around. So essentially, it does
On Thu, 6 May 2010 04:28:58 -0500, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 09:23:47 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Kayhan Tanriverir wrote:
You can try tso free all command
Not recommended. You may or may not be able to continue your session.
Still won't work if the file is open.
Of course!
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Try renaming the dataset to see who is keeping it.
Won't that tell who has it ENQueued but not what has it OPEN?
Yes. Thanks for pointing this out. It is very kind of you.
Perhaps the ENQ could point to the real culprit, but Paul Beesley spotted a
very likely reason of
Hi
Any way to pass user parameters (addresses) between different IPCS
verbexit routines ?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
On Thu, 6 May 2010 07:43:33 -0500, Mary Anne Matyaz maryanne4...@gmail.com
wrote:
Jim,
My understanding is that zfs's that you do not want to be sysplex aware
(sysplex=on in the IOEFSPRM member) should be owned on a separate lpar
that is not sysplex aware. (ie, the default in IOEFSPRM). So that
Part of the discussion a short time ago on this topic included a suggestion to
adjust the proprieties on Windows so that it will run the program in
compatibility mode. There was no response if that worked or another solution
was found.
HTH and good luck
-Original Message-
From:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 07:08:00 -0400, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
I have a situation where a CLIST is being interpreted as a REXX. This is
only happening on one LPAR out of 5
So on the other systems the CLIST is executed correctly - on the one it is
being interpreted as a
Hello:
We want to execute a test in a lpar without name-to-address or address-to-
name resolution (no access to resolver).
We want to isolate the lpar from dns access.
We have done the follow steps:
1. Create a separate TCPDATA member removing all reference to dns.
2. Set RESOLVER_PROC
There is a command that I think is on the CBT website called FINDQ. If you
issue the FINDQ command, you type:
FINDQ SYS1.L
It will show you exactly what is allocated to any dataset starting with SYS1.L
- linklib, lpalib etc. I hope that this command is on the CBT site. I have
found it
Couldn't locate it on CBT.
Albeit, I've only used it a few times so I'm not too familiar with it. I
searched File001 for FINDQ, no hits.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 8:15
If you're reduced to [running experiments] I hope you share the result.
Well, more important tasks are on the front burner. Honestly, the only
question that really matters is the first one -- maximum length -- and I can
pretty much infer the answer to that one from the limitations on FIND.
As
There is no need to find out who has a file allocated in this type of incident.
If FREE says the file is open, that means a task in the address space the FREE
command was entered has it opened. It is completely irrelevant what other
systems/address spaces may have the dataset allocated.
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
There is a command that I think is on the CBT website called FINDQ. If you
issue the FINDQ command, you type:
Thanks. It is really very kind of you. I appreciate it much!
I hope that this command is on the CBT site.
#Groan# I went over to cbttape.org, but could not
Can SVC 99 Information Retrieval retrieve information about concatenations
other than the first? Am I missing something? I don't see anything in the
documentation that says it cannot, but OTOH I don't see a way to specify
which concatenation number I am interested in. The documentation talks about
On 5/6/2010 at 11:00 AM, Jorge Garcia jgarc...@mapfre.com wrote:
Is there any step omitted?
Is there a /etc/resolv.conf file in your HFS?
Mark Post
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
No Mark. We don't have any configuration in USS.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
In snt113-w3d69b6bded95259c7678ac6...@phx.gbl, on 05/04/2010
at 10:19 PM, john gilmore john_w_gilm...@msn.com said:
If, as I think we may safely assume, 'transendental' is a misspelling of
'transcendental', this observation is incorrect.
Even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
An
In listserv%201005021038340084.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/02/2010
at 10:38 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
But why? Does channel hardware require that both ends of the buffer be
aligned? If 32759 works, why not 32767?
Software.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In 009066fa266f9b428db827deaa3c0e2701983...@exchangevs-04.ad.wsu.edu, on
05/04/2010
at 10:26 AM, Gibney, Dave gib...@wsu.edu said:
Am I the only one having trouble with CA web support.
No, but I've generally gotten in on the second attempt.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
In ofcba14ef4.35cea077-on48257718.001f04be-48257718.0020c...@us.ibm.com,
on 05/03/2010
at 01:58 PM, Timothy Sipples timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com said:
May I humbly point out that I've run into way too many mainframe people
which reject all user demands for Web UIs.
I haven't, although I have
In 4bdd7bea.5070...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 05/02/2010
at 03:19 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl said:
IBM says it's 32760.
No.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We don't have to
In listserv%201005031819000391.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/03/2010
at 06:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
I'm calling that simply incompetent display-to-numeric conversion,
I can call a rock an orange, but I still won't be able to get juice out of
it. The problem is clearly in the
In listserv%201005031342142910.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/03/2010
at 01:42 PM, Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com said:
Decimal Floating Point doesn't have this problem.
ObClinton That depends on what this is. DFP does have that problem when
dividing by, e.g., 3, 7, 11.
--
Shmuel
In aanlktin_kwrunbcukbyiey5tsmvcjt65nibtb9spp...@mail.gmail.com, on
05/04/2010
at 06:18 PM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
I believe transcendental numbers are a subset of irrationals is a valid
statement, but it sure *sounds* like 1970s psychobabble!
And RBI doesn't?
--
Shmuel
In listserv%201005021133302062.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/02/2010
at 11:33 AM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
SDB chooses 32760 for RECFM=U. I suppose this is wise,
For load libraries, it's the only reasonable choice. There aren't enough
other RECFM=U data sets to worry about, but
In
1991037664-1272805461-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-4242174...@bda026.bisx.prod.on.blackberry,
on 05/02/2010
at 01:04 PM, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca said:
Remember that the maximum blksize on dasd is 27998 ...
No. It's not.
It's 32765.
I might believe 32767 for unkeyed and
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net shmuel%2bibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
And RBI doesn't?
Runs Batted In? Reserve Bank of India? Repetitive Brain Injury?
--
For IBM-MAIN
Jorge
We want to execute a test in a lpar without name-to-address or address-to-
name resolution (no access to resolver).
Do you really want not to have any name to address (or address to name)
conversion or do you just want to avoid using a name server?
Either way, I can provide a means.
snipWhen we load the lpar and we enter the nslookup command, it's works
and
respond with a dns (¡¡not right!!). /snip
Jorge - what are you NSLOOKUPing? an internal name or an external name? If
it is an internal name it may be specified in the TCPIP.HOSTS.* files.
Also when you do an
On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:50:58 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
They don't have to be bloated, fragile and opaque, but they all too often
are[1]. By all means provide web access where it makes sense, but *DO IT
RIGHT*.
[1] Yes, that includes IBM web pages.
FWIW, www.ibm.com is one of the few
On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:11:29 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 4bdd7bea.5070...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 05/02/2010
at 03:19 PM, R.S. said:
IBM says it's 32760.
No.
Perhaps not everywhere, but in places:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/dgt2d551/2.2.16
On Thu, 6 May 2010 08:54:08 -0700 Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
:Can SVC 99 Information Retrieval retrieve information about concatenations
:other than the first? Am I missing something? I don't see anything in the
:documentation that says it cannot, but OTOH I don't see a way to specify
I can't leave these alone.
On Thu, 6 May 2010 11:42:07 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In listserv%201005031819000391.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/03/2010
at 06:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin said:
I'm calling that simply incompetent display-to-numeric conversion,
I can call a rock an orange, but
Thanks. That's a start. My whole problem is in MVS-OE if you're subscribed
to that also.
Relative number is the absolute DD statement number? Given
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=FOO
//DD1 DD DSN=MY.DS.ONE,...
// DD DSN=MY.DS.TWO,...
//DD2 DD DSN=MY.DS.THREE,...
// DD DSN=MY.DS.FOUR,...
http://www.daniweb.com/news/story281427.html
Friend of the author declared with all seriousness that every business, large
and small, is now almost totally Windows based, even in the server environment.
The friend actually seems to have believed it to be true.
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
Ron,
Wow! Thanks for the big investment in time and effort! I believe that I now
have a better understanding of what cache means (from MVS's perspective). It
appears that cache from MVS's perspective still has some meaning because it
still exists (in the ether) as a cache-within-a-cache thingy
I guess I got findq somewhere other than the CBT site. Unfortunately, I don't
have any copies of FINDQ. It worked very well. Maybe someone else will
recognize the name, and contribute it to the CBT site.
--
Eric Bielefeld
Systems Programmer
IBM MVS Technical Services
Dubuque, Iowa
going back decades it was possible to mangle the member name and do a STOW
to save an old member under the mangled name using the old TTR. You
just can't use those names in JCL. It would take an experiment to see if
LOAD and LINK would allow them.
We still have libraries with those members
In SPF, you can accomplish the same thing by entering 'ddlist enq sys1.l'.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Eric Bielefeld
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: ISPF table library cannot
going back decades it was possible to mangle the member name and do a STOW
to save an old member under the mangled name using the old TTR.
We did that with a homegrown change manglement system in the early 1980's.
You just can't use those names in JCL.
It would take an experiment to see if
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Kirk Talman
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Member name format for z/OS directory as simulated PDS?
going back decades it was possible to mangle the
Hello, Alan -
Are you the Alan Starr that contracted at Ford Motor Company in Europe a
few years ago?
If so, Egon sends his regards. He's on assignment in the States for this year.
Hope you are well, and glad to see you landed on your feet, and good to see
you active on IBM-MAIN...
Sorry, folks, obviously that was menat for Alan alone. Please disregard
my clicko.
Thanks,
Art Gutowski
Ford Motor Company
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
On Thu, 6 May 2010 15:49:12 -0400 Thompson, Steve
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com wrote:
:-Original Message-
:From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
:Behalf Of Kirk Talman
:Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 2:10 PM
:To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:Subject: Re: Member name
On Thu, 6 May 2010 10:23:29 -0700 Charles Mills charl...@mcn.org wrote:
:Thanks. That's a start. My whole problem is in MVS-OE if you're subscribed
:to that also.
:Relative number is the absolute DD statement number? Given
://STEP1 EXEC PGM=FOO
://DD1 DD DSN=MY.DS.ONE,...
:// DD
W dniu 2010-05-06 19:10, McKown, John pisze:
http://www.daniweb.com/news/story281427.html
Friend of the author declared with all seriousness that every business, large
and small, is now almost totally Windows based, even in the server environment.
The friend actually seems to have believed it
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:25 PM, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
W dniu 2010-05-06 19:10, McKown, John pisze:
http://www.daniweb.com/news/story281427.html
Friend of the author declared with all seriousness that every business,
large and small, is now almost totally Windows based,
I had this exact same problem. Adjusting the run/compatibility settings
wouldn't work.
The easiest thing to do is find some computer that is running a non-64 bit
version of windows. Install the product and then copy the directory that was
created to your 64 bit computer.
It appears just the
W dniu 2010-05-06 19:04, Paul Gilmartin pisze:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 12:11:29 -0400, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In4bdd7bea.5070...@bremultibank.com.pl, on 05/02/2010
at 03:19 PM, R.S. said:
IBM says it's 32760.
No.
Perhaps not everywhere, but in places:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 21:30:40 +0100, Sam Siegel s...@pscsi.net wrote:
And when talking to Unix/Windows folks, explaining (over and over)
that dataset nodes are not directory paths and that PDS(E) can only be
1 level deep.
As well as they way GDGs work (unless they have a VAX background).
First, some terminological clarification:
o BFP is IEEE-standard binary floating point;
o DFP is IEEE-standard decimal floating point; and
o HFP is IBM-standard hexadecimal floating point.
To repeat myself now, both BFP and DFP are IEEE-standard.
Next, some very basic
On 6 May 2010 15:10, Kirk Talman rkueb...@tsys.com wrote:
going back decades it was possible to mangle the member name and do a STOW
to save an old member under the mangled name using the old TTR. You
just can't use those names in JCL.
JCL doesn't restrict the characters allowed in a DSNAME,
On Thu, 6 May 2010 17:14:07 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
On 6 May 2010 15:10, Kirk Talman wrote:
going back decades it was possible to mangle the member name and do a STOW
to save an old member under the mangled name using the old TTR. You
just can't use those names in JCL.
JCL doesn't
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2010 4:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Member name format for z/OS directory as simulated PDS?
On Thu, 6 May 2010 17:14:07 -0400, Tony
On 6 May 2010 17:35, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 17:14:07 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
JCL doesn't restrict the characters allowed in a DSNAME, as long as
the DSNAME is quoted. But if it's quoted, it can't be catalogued.
Strange rule; I wonder what motivated it?
On Thu, 6 May 2010 18:32:10 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
JCL doesn't restrict the characters allowed in a DSNAME, as long as
the DSNAME is quoted. But if it's quoted, it can't be catalogued.
Strange rule; I wonder what motivated it?
DOS to MVS migrations would be my guess. When I'm doing one,
In listserv%201005061219411411.0...@bama.ua.edu, on 05/06/2010
at 12:19 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
The discussion concerned apparent imprecise conversion of,
e.g. 1.75 to IEE (or hex) FP.
Confirming what I wrote; it's a numeric conversion issue, not a display
issue.
--
In t2s4e2421a41005061330ic150eda4wca4225caff5d...@mail.gmail.com, on
05/06/2010
at 09:30 PM, Sam Siegel s...@pscsi.net said:
And when talking to Unix/Windows folks, explaining (over and over) that
dataset nodes are not directory paths
You're not using CVOL's any more?
--
Shmuel
On 6 May 2010 16:53:34 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 6 May 2010 17:35, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010 17:14:07 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
JCL doesn't restrict the characters allowed in a DSNAME, as long as
the DSNAME is quoted. But if it's quoted,
On 6 May 2010 14:14:33 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
First, some terminological clarification:
o BFP is IEEE-standard binary floating point;
o DFP is IEEE-standard decimal floating point; and
o HFP is IBM-standard hexadecimal floating point.
To repeat myself now, both
On 6 May 2010 19:53, Tony Harminc t...@harminc.net wrote:
It's been that way forever. Since before there were catalogues, I
believe. I think the can't be catalogued if it's quoted just means
that the comparison of the DISP=(...CATLG...) is done before the
syntax check
That came out
I will be out of the office starting 07/05/2010 and will not return until
17/05/2010.
I will respond to your mail, if required ,on my return.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
79 matches
Mail list logo
