And of course there is Compuware Eclipse based offerings.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Chase, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eyal Rothfeld
> >
> > Does anybody know any new technologies which can be used in order to
> > develop
Greetings,
Generally speaking as I understand it CPU capacity is not a major factor in the
duration of an IPL. It is mostly IO bound.
Have you checked out the following somewhat recent IBM Redbook?
System z Mean Time to Recovery Best Practices
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247816.htm
I would open a support issue. I wasn't aware of that status in 2008.
It still runs on our systems. Regardless, you should get help with
whatever problem you are experiencing.
znor...@ca.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of
So it was functionally stabilized but not operationally stabilized?
:-)
On 5/14/2010 at 5:26 PM, in message
, Leif Rundberget
wrote:
> The CA-TCPaccess software was functionally stabilized in April 2008. A year
> later we noticed stability issues with the software. And many third party
> softwa
The CA-TCPaccess software was functionally stabilized in April 2008. A year
later we noticed stability issues with the software. And many third party
software products don't support it anymore. I just got through migrating
from CA-TCPaccess to IBM Communications Server the beginning of this mont
See the following exempt from the RACFTGT job (part of ServerPac):
SETROPTS +
GENERIC(DATASET STARTED XFACILIT PROGRAM +
SDSF OPERCMDS JESSPOOL) +
and guess - what wrong with that?
(The answer is below)
below
below
below
Answer:
PROGRAM class. This class
On 14 May 2010 10:13:50 -0700, john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov (John
Kelly) wrote:
>or give the retired person a call.
That worked.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.e
I don't have it, but I think that FDREPORT(?) can do scans of PDSes and listing
of member names.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthm
I need to find a PDS member, and I know it starts with QA05. Trouble is,
I don't know the name of the PDS.
As suggested scan the possible JCL/PROC libraries. If that doesn't find
anything, either RECALL that user's DSN, scan SMF, eg SMF21, maybe
SMF42.6, SMF42.21, or give the retired person
Wild-carded datasetnames? I don't think z/OS supports directly but there are
clever things one can do with Rexx, etc. Perhaps there is something on the
CBT tape.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Howard Brazee
Sent: F
On Fri, 14 May 2010 10:30:32 -0600, Howard Brazee
wrote:
>I need to find a PDS member, and I know it starts with QA05. Trouble
>is, I don't know the name of the PDS. (The person who created it
>retired). I suspect the PDS is archived off.
>
>What do you recommend?
>
Option 3.4 has a membe
On 14 May 2010 09:46:16 -0700, charl...@mcn.org (Charles Mills) wrote:
>Would a search of JCL libraries for 'QA05' possibly turn up a reference to
>it?
I looked in the obvious candidate PDSes.Is there a way to submit a
batch search with bigger wild cards?
Captain Paralytic wrote on 05/14/2010 09:24:59 AM:
>If I do something like
>
> OUTREC FIELDS=(1,80,576:X)
>
>then I will have an output record filled with spaces between
>position 81 and position 576
>
>If I do
>
> OUTREC FIELDS=(1,80,576:C'#')
>
>I'll get a # in position 576 but 81-575 will be sp
Would a search of JCL libraries for 'QA05' possibly turn up a reference to
it?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Finding a member
I n
I need to find a PDS member, and I know it starts with QA05. Trouble
is, I don't know the name of the PDS. (The person who created it
retired). I suspect the PDS is archived off.
What do you recommend?
--
For IBM-MAIN subsc
>I'm debating with management right now on the distance between our data
centers being too close and I'm collecting information from anyone I can talk
to about how far apart others have their's.
I've worked at two shops, and they were at (potential) extremes.
One had the primary just north of Tor
Jeffrey Deaver wrote:
>I'm NOT looking for a mass response on data center distances.
Only one mass response from me: If there is a fence between the two data
centers, then they are too NEAR !!! ;-D
Is it already Friday?
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
-
Edward Jaffe pisze:
Edward Jaffe wrote:
The profile you create depends upon whether your shop uses the
Enhanced Generic Naming feature. See:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichza4a1/A.3.2
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichza4a1/A.3.3
I j
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> Greg Shirey wrote:
> > Okay, my RACF is a little rusty, but isn't there a difference
between a
> > profile define as 'GIM.*' and one defined as 'GIM.**'? The IBM APAR
> > advises to rdefine GIM.* (and
Obviously, that was an email forwarding mistake. I'm NOT looking for a
mass response on data center distances. Thanks.
Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer
Systems Engineering
jeffrey.dea...@securian.com
651-665-4231(v)
IS - "Creating competitive advantage with technology. Providing service
that excels."
OS
Edward Jaffe wrote:
The profile you create depends upon whether your shop uses the
Enhanced Generic Naming feature. See:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichza4a1/A.3.2
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/ichza4a1/A.3.3
I just read these sectio
Tom -
General numbers here, but our 449 MIP z9 2096-S02 IPLs in about 5 minutes
and the new z10 CBU machine we have at 26 mips, a 2098-A01 when its not
turned up, manages to still IPL the same processes in 15 minutes or so.
Hope that helps.
Say.. if you have a second... can you share where your
Greg Shirey wrote:
Okay, my RACF is a little rusty, but isn't there a difference between a
profile define as 'GIM.*' and one defined as 'GIM.**'? The IBM APAR
advises to rdefine GIM.* (and echoed by Mark Z), but JC and Ed Jaffe are
advising GIM.**.
The profile you create depends upon whethe
Greg Shirey pisze:
Okay, my RACF is a little rusty, but isn't there a difference between a
profile define as 'GIM.*' and one defined as 'GIM.**'? The IBM APAR
advises to rdefine GIM.* (and echoed by Mark Z), but JC and Ed Jaffe are
advising GIM.**.
Actually no. However you shouldn't define bo
It is working on our z/OS 1.9, 1.10 and 1.11 systems.
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht <
elardus.engelbre...@sita.co.za> wrote:
> Daniel McLaughlin wrote:
>
> >What is the highest level of Z/OS you've run CICS 1.3 on? We're on Z1.7
> and
> it's running fine, but have to upgrad
Okay, my RACF is a little rusty, but isn't there a difference between a
profile define as 'GIM.*' and one defined as 'GIM.**'? The IBM APAR
advises to rdefine GIM.* (and echoed by Mark Z), but JC and Ed Jaffe are
advising GIM.**.
Thanks in advance,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.
-Original M
My management wants to benchmark the IPL process to see how long it will
take at various levels of MIPS, MSUs, or whatever measurement criteria
can be used. The purpose of this is to determine what the smallest z10
is we can contract for our DR site that will IPL in a reasonable time
frame. The
Daniel McLaughlin wrote:
>What is the highest level of Z/OS you've run CICS 1.3 on? We're on Z1.7 and
it's running fine, but have to upgrade the OS later this year.
Look at
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21207399
and (for 1.7)
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS
What is the highest level of Z/OS you've run CICS 1.3 on? We're on Z1.7 and
it's running fine, but have to upgrade the OS later this year.
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists
Hi Bertus,
In fact, it has my userid in front, but in the e-mail I cannot put it due to
internal security policies, it is being substituted by MY.FILE.TO.SEND.
In the sysout it replaces the filename correctly as it is created in the
catalog.
Regards,
Enrique.
_
I found an old PTF for Netview V2.2 (1995)
PTF List:
Release 220 : UN86028 available 95/12/29 (F512 )
Release 230 : UN86029 available 95/12/29 (F512 )
Parent APAR:
Child APAR list:
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
Transferring to an SMS managed VSAM dataset, using the NFTP sup-
plied
It is not clear to me from the manual if PLO does a trial instruction
verifying that the storage areas can be changes.
For example, if PLO.CSDST is issued, are the possible results (assuming that
nothing screws around with the page tables):
1. 0C4 on operand1
2. Operand1 stored, 0c4 on operand2
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
>
> Mark Zelden wrote:
> > Not if you define only 1 profile as GIM.*. I suspect that will
suffice for
> > at least 95% of the shops out there. We've already discussed the
> > unlikelihood of shops desiri
Hi team,
Here once again with another issue. :-)
Using the Tivoli Netview FTP to send a file from node A to node B.
The JCL
//STEP0001 EXEC NFTPX
//FILE1 DD DSN=MY.FILE.TO.SEND,DISP=SHR
//SYSINDD *
FUNCTION=ADD
Aayush Tiwari wrote:
>Thanks for the information Barry, will this create the differences in the
>access
list of various similar type of dataset and class profiles.
Yes. Take a long and hard look at all the output datasets. Use side by side
comparision.
For example on one output you will see, s
35 matches
Mail list logo
