Ich werde ab 20.07.2010 nicht im Büro sein. Ich kehre zurück am
22.07.2010.
Bitte wenden Sie sich in dringenden Fällen an Willem van den Haak ( email:
willem.vandenh...@ecs-group.com Telefon: +32 2 773 22 99)
I am not in the office from 20.07.10. I am back on 22.07.10.
In urgend cases please co
Thanks to all that responded to my inquiry. I will try some of the methods
suggested.
Sincerely;
Ken Kripke
kkri...@mindspring.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@
Crispin,
I always thought that workload that changes day to day is really no
different than workload that changes minute by minute.
Perhaps some time spent looking at WLM will be better than going the
sub-capacity route. Why slow something down all the time, when you can slow
it down equitably s
Thankx
The SVOLARC parm seems to be in a clist MACRO DSN6ARVP
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 6:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: number of dasd volume(s) for DB2
Inst
Thanxk
The
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 6:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: number of dasd volume(s) for DB2
Instead of displaying the SYS1.VTOCIX, instead go to
Instead of displaying the SYS1.VTOCIX, instead go to ISMF 2.1 (DASD) and
display the volume itself. It is the better way to validate an SMS volume.
Or if you have console authority, use the D SMS command on the volume
D SMS,VOL(SCRTCG)
If it is SMS managed, it will show that in this list. If it
Eric Bielefeld on IBM Mainframe Discussion List
wrote on 07/19/2010 02:37:53 PM:
> So what did the ISPF Sort interface do? Did anyone use it?
This was the interface for generating DFSORT jobs from ISPF Panels.
Although we thought it was a good idea when we first developed it
back in 1991, as it
Okay I see I cann't just run the clist have to go through the tailoring
guide
I'll check the SVOLARC parm
And last I don't think I am using a SMS vol because when I display the VTOC
in 3.2
I get **NOBE** Mangement Class Stroage Class and Data Class
Data Set Name . . . . : SYS1.VTOCIX.
It may be that you have received message
DSNT470I
If not, was there a DSN message produced? If possible please post the
entire message.
Second, have you reviewed the SVOLARC parm in the clist?
You may wish to review the Installation manual, section 4.1 Tailoring the
DSNTINST installation Clist.
So what did the ISPF Sort interface do? Did anyone use it? It seems to me
Syncsort used to have an interface that you could use to enter parameters,
and it would generate sort control cards.
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
IBM Global Services Division
Dubuque, Iowa
414-477-7259
-
Thanks to all who have responded.
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Pommier, Rex R.
wrote:
> This is an excerpt from the z/OS 1.9 migration manual:
>
> Use means other than ISPF to invoke DFSORT
>
> z/OS V1R9.0 Migration - All supported migration paths
> GA22-7499-11
>
> Description: The DFSORT(tm
This is an excerpt from the z/OS 1.9 migration manual:
Use means other than ISPF to invoke DFSORT
z/OS V1R9.0 Migration - All supported migration paths
GA22-7499-11
Description: The DFSORT(tm) ISPF panels are used to generate and execute
DFSORT jobs, and are available in both English and Japanes
Yes. I don't remember where however. (Take a look at the zOS 1.10 announcement
letter, it might have been there).
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Daniel Allen
Sent: Mon 7/19/2010 5:27 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Question about
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 14:15 -0700, Daniel Allen wrote:
> On our z/OS 1.9 system, we have 11 DFSORT libraries prefixed with
> SYS1.SICE*.
>
> On our z/OS 1.10 and 1.11 systems, we have 6 DFSORT libraries prefixed with
> SYS1.SICE*
>
> What seems to be missing is the ISPF part to DFSORT.
>
> What
Was it documented that the ISFF DF/SORT interface was no longer supported ?
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
> The ISPF DF/SORT interface is no longer supplied (or supported) with the
> product at those levels.
>
> Mark Jacobs
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainfr
The ISPF DF/SORT interface is no longer supplied (or supported) with the
product at those levels.
Mark Jacobs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Daniel Allen
Sent: Mon 7/19/2010 5:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Question about DFSORT ISPF librari
It went bye-bye.
>>> Daniel Allen 7/19/2010 5:15 PM >>>
On our z/OS 1.9 system, we have 11 DFSORT libraries prefixed with
SYS1.SICE*.
On our z/OS 1.10 and 1.11 systems, we have 6 DFSORT libraries prefixed with
SYS1.SICE*
What seems to be missing is the ISPF part to DFSORT.
What happened to the
On our z/OS 1.9 system, we have 11 DFSORT libraries prefixed with
SYS1.SICE*.
On our z/OS 1.10 and 1.11 systems, we have 6 DFSORT libraries prefixed with
SYS1.SICE*
What seems to be missing is the ISPF part to DFSORT.
What happened to the ISPF part of DFSORT for z/OS 1.10 and 1.11 ?
---
I didn't see anywhere in DSNTINST set up clist where it asks you for the
VOLSER to install the different components
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 3:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sub
In case you did not know, there is a DB2 Newsgroup that might be a better
source. You can find then at IDUG.ORG.
Second, the question is not very clear. Are you including DB2 Databases?
DB2 System Catalogs? DB2 nonVSAM datasets? Are you asking about the SMP
Files (Tlibs, Dlibs and SMP librarie
Guys,
I have found what look like two problems in TSSO that may be involved in an HSM
issue I am having. I need another set of eyes to make sure I'm looking at this
right. Anyone have experience in the TSSO code that can spend a little time
looking at this with me?
TIA
Scott Rowe
CONFI
>I THINK that some LE runtime components are COBOL specific and may be extra
>cost.
This is false, 100% of the IBM LE runtime for COBOL (Enterprise COBOL for z/OS)
is
included with z/OS.
Having said that, there are extra products you can buy like Report Writer and
EGL that work with COBOL and a
--
And here I was thinking IBM was trying to convince the world that as
long as you didn't allow anyone to run SMP/E there were no known
(acknowledged) vulnerabilities ...
Damn.
Thanks all.
Luke
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Jim McAlpine
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:15 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: DFdss DUMP DATASET runs longer on z/OS 1.11 vs. z/OS 1.9
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:57
--
As those of you following my IEFU8x thread know, I've just taken over
responsibility for some IEFU8x code. It needs some serious re-writing
and while I've got a lot of 360 to Z experience, this is my first SMF
exit, so I'd l
In a message dated 7/19/2010 2:23:03 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
michealb...@optonline.net writes:
Does it allocate all these components on different volumes ??
>>
It allocates them where you tell it! The preference is to separate TLIBs,
DLIBs, BSDS and the DB/2 catalog and then sepa
In a message dated 7/19/2010 11:25:28 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
john_j_ke...@ao.uscourts.gov writes:
Do you know of any search criteria that would find what the VOLSER is
hidden away with?
>>
The VOLSER is not known to the ATL for NL. You can check in an NL as any
VOLSER and it will assi
Looking at the DB2 subsystem storage requirements
It seems DB2 needs space for libraries catalogs directories logs BSDS
Workfile
Does it allocate all these components on different volumes ??
Because I keep on getting the "At Least one more volume"
message
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Rabbe, Luke <
luke.ra...@countryfinancial.com> wrote:
> I have a DFdss job that dumps a small subset of datasets and excludes a
> very large subset of datasets identified by a high-level qualifier mask.
>
> DUMP OUTDDNAME(TAPE) -
> DATAS
This sounds like OA32120.
Larre Shiller
US Social Security Administration
410.965.2209
www.ssa.gov
"The contents of this message are mine personally and do not necessarily
reflect any official position of the US Government or the US Social Security
Administration."
-
W dniu 2010-07-19 20:57, Rabbe, Luke pisze:
I have a DFdss job that dumps a small subset of datasets and excludes a very
large subset of datasets identified by a high-level qualifier mask.
DUMP OUTDDNAME(TAPE) -
DATASET(INCLUDE( -
I have a DFdss job that dumps a small subset of datasets and excludes a very
large subset of datasets identified by a high-level qualifier mask.
DUMP OUTDDNAME(TAPE) -
DATASET(INCLUDE( -
HLQ.** -
Ron,
Many thanks for your information. It will a great help in our planning.
Our biggest problem is that our workload changes all the time daily
weekly etc. It all depends on what our developers are working on and
what problems our SE's are sorting out. The only two 'killers' we have
on our system
Thanks.
> request your vendor word in ECVTCTBL
Can anyone point me at the right resource for that? I Googled and got nothing relevant. My client is not primarily a
mainframe software company and at this point they have no IBM contact point
whatsoever.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: I
On 07/19/10 13:13, Charles Mills wrote:
Thanks.
request your vendor word in ECVTCTBL
Can anyone point me at the right resource for that? I Googled and got nothing relevant. My client is not primarily a
mainframe software company and at this point they have no IBM contact point
whats
That name sounds familiar.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Mark Jacobs
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Best practices for SMF exit routines
Looking at an old apar OW13312
Scott,
Thanks for the reply. I went thru the web interface but I can't find a
CATEGORY that has a VOLSER like the one that I put in and a blank
VOLSER/CATEGORY search appears to be limited to 100 entries.
Do you know of any search criteria that would find what the VOLSER is
hidden away with?
Crispin,
>From what I read of your email you are trying to choose between two
sub-capacity z10 models, one with two CP and one with four, that have
roughly the same total MIPS as your current z9 which has two CP. If I have
that part correct, then the sub-capacity uniprocessor MIPS speed of the z10
The answer lies at the bottom of every message
"- Tibish Mathew"
Sent by: "IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
19/07/2010 05:36 PM
Please respond to
"IBM Mainframe Discussion List"
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: Best practices for SMF exit routines
Can someone remove
Can someone remove my name from this mailing list ?
regards,
Tibish
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Mon 7/19/2010 8:50 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Best practices for SMF exit routines
Then request your vendor
The doc says one volume would be enough as it seems to have about 3339
cylinders
The doc says that for a small site 3390 dasd I need 84 cylinders on a 3390
But keep on getting a message
At least on VOLUME need message when I try executing DSNTINST to install DB2
>From the Z/OS installation
Then request your vendor word in ECVTCTBL and use it as the anchor for your
blocks. No need to use an SSCT unless you need to do some subsystem services.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:12:33 -0700 Charles Mills wrote:
:>Vendor.
:>
:>Charles
:>
:>-Original Message-
:>From: IBM Mainframe Discussio
U84 & U85 may require an FRR in place of an ESTAE.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:12:26 -0500 Dave Day wrote:
:>Charles,
:>This is what I do in my code. My code installs exits into IEFUSI and
IEFACTRT.
:>
:>The server address space that installs the exits before doing anything
else, queries t
Vendor.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Best practices for SMF exit routines
Are you a vendor or is this for your site? The
Charles,
This is what I do in my code. My code installs exits into IEFUSI and
IEFACTRT.
The server address space that installs the exits before doing anything
else, queries the exits using CSVDYNEX REQUEST=LIST to determine if they are
active on the system. I query for SYS., SYSJES2,
Hi
Looking back to my code about 1992 ... , an SMF exit system, with
"companion non-exit code " , was
a subsystem , communicated with the SMF exit via PC routines and has a
subsystem initialization routine etc
My point is, in an environment like this, maybe you need the subsystem.
On
Hi Rick
In addition to all valuable replies about this item , the following notes
maybe helpful for you to double check more ...
1- I strongly recommend you to use zPCR for both options and don't think about
MIPs or PCI first. Checking throughput from zPCR will be the first step .The
through
Micheal Butz pisze:
Hi
Would any know how many 3390 mod 3 does it take to bring up DB2 V9.1
See Program Directory. ...and add some space for required operational
datasets.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
BRE Bank SA
ul. Senatorska 18
00-950 Warszawa
www.brebank.pl
Sd Rejonowy
> What do you mean about the "companion non-exit code"?
You can't "do much" in the exit code itself because the code path has to be
short, and various exits impose constraints like "no SVCs." So there has to
be a companion piece of code that "does the slow stuff" (writes to a file,
etc.) based on
Jack,
You need to get into the libraries web interface and locate the volume, you can
then either assign it a volser, or eject it from the library.
Scott
>>> John Kelly 7/19/2010 9:42 AM >>>
To settle a disagreement, I put a tape without barcode information
into an IBM ATL, d/t 3584
Are you a vendor or is this for your site? The vendor answer is more
complicated.
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:45:24 -0700 Charles Mills wrote:
:>As those of you following my IEFU8x thread know, I've just taken over
:>responsibility for some IEFU8x code. It needs some serious re-writing and
:>while I'
Suggestions/opinions in-stream (by no means an exhaustive or definitive list) :
>>Q : What's the best way for the IEFU8x code to "find" its companion non-exit
code? In the current code the non-exit module defines itself as a subsystem,
anchors a table in SSCTSUSE, and then the IEFU83 exit scans t
On Mon, 2010-07-19 at 09:27 -0400, Alan Harrison wrote:
> Please visit my developerWorks blog "zSecurity" here http://j.mp/aDJp10
... which forwards to:
https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/mydeveloperworks/blogs/zSecurity/entry/documenting_vulnerabilities5?lang=en
-
On 7/19/2010 3:45 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
As those of you following my IEFU8x thread know, I've just taken over
responsibility for some IEFU8x code. It needs some serious re-writing and
while I've got a lot of 360 to Z experience, this is my first SMF exit, so
I'd like to tap the collective wisd
You are mistaken.
However, the compiler can be quite expensive, so if you are only using a little
Cobol, converting that code to another language can save some money.
>>> Clark Morris 7/17/2010 10:31 AM >>>
On 16 Jul 2010 19:21:48 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On Fri, 2010-07-16
Hi
Would any know how many 3390 mod 3 does it take to bring up DB2 V9.1
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the ar
And here I was thinking IBM was trying to convince the world that as
long as you didn't allow anyone to run SMP/E there were no known
(acknowledged) vulnerabilities ...
Damn.
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archi
As those of you following my IEFU8x thread know, I've just taken over
responsibility for some IEFU8x code. It needs some serious re-writing and
while I've got a lot of 360 to Z experience, this is my first SMF exit, so
I'd like to tap the collective wisdom of the group.
- What's the best way for t
Considering the future, and, hopefully, EAV being more prevalent in future,
a better choice than DCBTIOT is to use DSABTIOT.
Once the DCB is open, issue GETDSAB LOC=ANY,DCBPTR= ...
and use the DSABTIOT change to detect the concatenation change after each GET.
Mike Wood RMM Development
To settle a disagreement, I put a tape without barcode information
into an IBM ATL, d/t 3584 (aka TS3500). The ATL took the tape and put it
in a slot and the display indicated that the VOLSER was Unknown' . So I
would assume that it's not assigned to a Logical Library because it's not
I've been involved in a long discussion on LinkedIn about mainframe
vulnerabilities.
We are discussing whether a central repository of common configuration errors
is
a good idea. I have created a Wiki on IBM developerWorks which we System z
Security experts could fill up with common RACF error
Thank you, thank you, thank you Rob, Peter, and Kees.
This is exactly the information I was looking for. This should enable us to
solve it.
I spent a lot of time yesterday with Init & Tuning and Exits but there are
so many descriptions in there that were layered on top of each other over
time --
>If an IEFU83 exit is to be added via CSVDYNEX REQUEST=ADD
It never is. You add an exit routine (module) to an exit. At an exit
point, the system calls exit routine(s) associated with the exit.
>What has to exist or not exist in SMFPRMxx, PROGxx,
>and EXITxx in order for the exit to be invoked?
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 12:00:02 +0200, Gilbert Saint-Flour wrote:
>> I wish to detect when a BSAM read or QSAM GET crosses a concatenation
>> boundary.
>> I am guessing I need to code an OPEN and EOV DCB exit to get control.
>
>You don't need an exit, just check the value of DCBTIOT which is increas
> I wish to detect when a BSAM read or QSAM GET crosses a concatenation
> boundary.
> I am guessing I need to code an OPEN and EOV DCB exit to get control.
You don't need an exit, just check the value of DCBTIOT which is increased
each time QSAM/BSAM start to read the next concatenated DD. Here's
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 00:14:10 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>
>One potential GOTCHA - The EOV exit will be driven not only when you
>reach the end of a file and switch to the next file in the
>concatenation but ALSO during a volume switch of a multi-volume
>sequential dataset. Thus you need to c
>There were separate products released for MVS, VM, and VSE. All were released
>in 1983.
There was also a version for CICS. I don't know when it became available.
Bob Shannon
Rocket Software
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
John P. Baker
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IND$FILE question
Ed,
There were separate products released for MVS, VM, and VSE. All were
released i
"Charles Mills" wrote in message
news:<00c901cb26b9$f359e070$da0da1...@org>...
> > I.o.w.: check that site's SMFPRMxx
>
> I hope someone is reading this on a Sunday ...
>
> Please have patience with me. I'm a developer not a sysprog and I know
many
> things but I am not (yet!) an SMF exit expert
69 matches
Mail list logo
