Any idea to speed up the SDSF REXX interface ?
Til now:
- we put the ISFLINK to LPA
- using compiled REXX
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message:
Hi to all.
We have a problem in a batch FTP that try to recall a locally migrated
dataset(ftp is a GET (REPLACE ) and fail because it try to use HSM(ADSMI002
error) instead of DMS.
We are in a sysplex and the same FTP works fine in 3/4 of SYS.
Using other method(IEFBR14 and so on) recall works
Gil, did you try going in to 'View ETR Record' and putting in the pmr number
and branch?
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/etr/etrViewSubmit.wss
I did, and I am not authorized to view that record, but it *is* there.
MA
--
Make sure that you have executed a properly configured FDRSTART on the LPAR in
question.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Marco Gianfranco Indaco
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 6:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject:
Hi to all.
We have a problem in a batch FTP that try to recall a locally migrated
dataset(ftp is a
GET (REPLACE ) and fail because it try to use HSM(ADSMI002
error) instead of DMS.
We are in a sysplex and the same FTP works fine in 3/4 of SYS.
Using other method(IEFBR14 and so on) recall
Ops, I pasted the wrong msg, sorry the error is ARC0050A
Current version is CA DISK r12.5
Apologize.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO
In 853280809359.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu, on
01/16/2012
at 12:20 PM, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com said:
Indeed. I regard that as multiprocessing,
Multiprogramming.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
z/OS 1.12
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
In 8457a39f-5e00-40d7-9f52-3128d654d...@yahoo.com, on 01/16/2012
at 09:30 PM, Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com said:
Knew a guy 15 yrs a go made a lot of money still writing auto coder
I might believe AUTOCODER. Would that be 1401, 1410, 7070[1] or 7080
AUTOCODER?
[1] By far the most
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:34:48 -0600, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:14:04 -0800, Cris Hernandez #9 wrote:
when I want to know what a job did, I read it's output using REXX, whether
it's the util/pgm output to a file or the JES output pulled off the output
Marco Gianfranco Indaco mgind...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:CAPbaEcFbkRaNqzq=f-_sH=eht+f5_44mxyts+lb+5v2ieyq...@mail.gmail.com
...
Ops, I pasted the wrong msg, sorry the error is ARC0050A
Current version is CA DISK r12.5
Apologize.
IIRC, DMS intercepts the Catalog Request and checks if
I just don't seem to be able to find a way to delete an obsolete LPAR
definition from our z9BC system. It was originally on our z890, and ran an ICF
LPAR. We no longer have the ICF engine. And the dim wits in IBM billing are
constantly dunning my manager about what is that and why does it show
Tks, for the suggest, I've not verified but it works using IEFBR14 and
other utility.
The problem affect ftp only both if client or server
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Marco Gianfranco Indaco mgind...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:capbaeceagpufhhjjhje7qwwd0ahhwb415dgb9b7ypk4ybbx...@mail.gmail.com
...
Tks, for the suggest, I've not verified but it works using IEFBR14 and
other utility.
The problem affect ftp only both if client or server
OK, probably FTP
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:32:00 -0600, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:34:48 -0600, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2012 13:14:04 -0800, Cris Hernandez #9 wrote:
when I want to know what a job did, I read it's output using REXX, whether
it's the util/pgm output to a file or the
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 05:48:43 -0600, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
Gil, did you try going in to 'View ETR Record' and putting in the pmr number
and branch?
https://www-304.ibm.com/ibmlink/etr/etrViewSubmit.wss
I did, and I am not authorized to view that record, but it *is* there.
Indeed. Works.
Hi,
Charles Prineas has updated his dirt cheap ($20 USD) and highly useful utility
V File Viewer.
This is one of the tools I use almost every day.
The latest release includes several very nice enhancements for mainframer's.
http://www.fileviewer.com/index.html
Best Regards, Sam Knutson
V
W dniu 2012-01-17 15:39, McKown, John pisze:
I just don't seem to be able to find a way to delete an obsolete LPAR definition from our
z9BC system. It was originally on our z890, and ran an ICF LPAR. We no longer have the
ICF engine. And the dim wits in IBM billing are constantly dunning my
IBM whines at my manager about it every month. And wants to increase our
software bill for it because we have no SMF from it showing its usage. That's
because it is __idle__. I just DEACTIVATED the LPAR. Maybe that will shut the
money grubbers at IBM up. Yes, I'm upset. It's hard enough to keep
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:44:28 -0500, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com
wrote:
The character '_' does not have this function. It cannot indeed be
used in this way. To call it an underscore is thus at once incorrect
and rather silly. It is of a piece with Mr Gainford's misuse of the
word
W dniu 2012-01-17 18:54, McKown, John pisze:
IBM whines at my manager about it every month.
And wants to increase our software bill for it because we have no SMF from it
showing its usage.
Reason is ?
You can have active non-z/OS LPARS (CFCC and zLinux are not subject to
pay). You can have
Could you change the name of the LPAR to an asterisk * ?
This would allow you to mark it as a dynamic LPAR and gives the ability to
re-use the LPAR in the future.
---
IBM whines at my manager about it every month. And
And I can't figure out what started it...
Completely confused,
Greg Shirey
Ben E. Keith Co.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 12:11 PM
This entire conversation is rather
Alan Altmark writes:
/begin snippet
This entire conversation is rather silly, but I feel compelled to
point out that 'underscore' and 'low line' are the official names for
that symbol [which are not regulated by the OED or other dictionary,
btw]. There is a spacing underscore and a combining
I'm just going to eliminate it. Our z is a slowly dying system. The probability
of me needing another LPAR beyond the 3 we currently use is about as likely the
U.S. Federal Government eliminating income tax. Maybe even less likely.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services
To protest 'Piracy Laws' Wiki is shutting itself off Wed 17 Jan. Evidently
Google is participating but only by changing it's banner page.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
W dniu 2012-01-17 20:43, McKown, John pisze:
I'm just going to eliminate it. Our z is a slowly dying system. The probability
of me needing another LPAR beyond the 3 we currently use is about as likely the
U.S. Federal Government eliminating income tax. Maybe even less likely.
So, probably
State Farm, in 1973, was completely dependent on AUTOCODER which
was then running on 360/30s and 360/40s in the 25 regional offices,
while the new Real Time replacement application was still being
created (in PL/1). When the Real Time system ultimately failed,
the next iteration was called DELTA
Barry,
My experience with PL/1 wasnt so good. In the 70's and 80's it was pretty CPU
intensive, i was on a 370/158 OS/VS2/HASP ...then later VSE on a 4381 , PL/1
probably is much better with the faster machines.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On
John --
Another option that IBM could have pointed out Your situation is very
common, and IBM did modify SCRT to help sites with this issue. SCRT's PARMS DD
statement provides a technique to hard code this information one time, so you
don't need to do it month after month. In the PARMS DD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Al Sherkow
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 2:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Help: Delete LPAR definition from z9BC
John --
Another option that IBM could have pointed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
To protest 'Piracy Laws' Wiki is shutting itself off Wed 17 Jan.
Evidently Google is participating but
only by changing it's banner page.
Wow! Six years' advance notice!
(The next Wednesday, Jan. 17
Later ones did. I was on one of the first. Available with 4K or8K words
of storage.
Rick
On 1/16/2012 4:21 PM, Tom Harper wrote:
1620s came with either 20, 40, or 60K.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
I think I have my terminology correct. I have a user who wants to print the
brackets, braces, carat, back slash, tilde and veticle bar? Where can I find
what resources contain those elements and what character set contains them?
Paul P
Anyone remember the 96-column cards? I'd like to find a box of them.
Rick
On 1/16/2012 10:13 PM, Mohd Rizwan wrote:
Quite interesting
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Scott Fordscott_j_f...@yahoo.com wrote:
Linda,
This development is simply
Anyone remember the 96-column cards? I'd like to find a box of them.
Sure. Send your address offlist and I will send a few. Sorry, they are
punched already!
--
Will
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Well, got ahead or behind depending on where you're located. It's tomorrow!
In a message dated 1/17/2012 4:29:59 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jch...@ussco.com writes:
Wow! Six years' advance notice!
--
For IBM-MAIN
Rick,
I believe you are thinking of a different machine. The 1620 did not have any
words. It had individually addressable digits.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Rick Fochtman
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 4:00
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 15:28:18 -0500, Lizette Koehler stars...@mindspring.com
wrote:
We just completed the upgrade to CA MSM 4.1. So far not bad. However, we no
longer have our SMP/E output because that was in TEMP files in MSM. So the
task history is empty and any information I had from the
Assuming you might be referring to AFP fonts, try looking at this link:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/printer/info/afpdb/codepage.htm
If you're working with a terminal emulator like Personal Communications,
try this:
Well, the runs counter to the many sites that moved their applications
to PL/1, including State Farm (who trained 1,500 non-programmers to use
PL/1 in a 9 week course - those with musical ability, mathematical degrees,
or knowledge of two or more languages accounted for 90% of the folks who
were
Well, the runs counter to the many sites that moved their applications
to PL/1, including State Farm (who trained 1,500 non-programmers to use
PL/1 in a 9 week course - those with musical ability, mathematical degrees,
or knowledge of two or more languages accounted for 90% of the folks who
were
On 1/17/2012 6:22 PM, Roberts, John J wrote:
Also, is it PL/1 or PL/I?
My mainframe IBM manuals use PL/I.
The early version(s) of the S/360 compilers were inefficient by
not using available hardware instructions, e.g., bit fiddling
doable with OI and NI was implemented as subroutine calls.
Barry,
I can understand that, hence the catch on of COBOL vs ASM.
I worked a lot of SAS back in the v5 and v6 days. To me it was pretty straight
forward no
Problem, but then again I was a sysprog.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 17, 2012, at
Yep Gerhard exactly, the machines/microcode have improved significantly
Over the S/360 and370 days and with the advent of MVSand above the 16m line ,
things really took off. But I ask myself, how popular was PL/1 ? I wrote in it
a bit on OS/VS2, loved it.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior
We are a big insurance company in Germany, and we do PL/1 until today.
We also do ASM and C, but no COBOL - never.
I heard some years ago that only about 5 % of the mainframe programs are
PL/1,
compared to 80 % COBOL. Don't know, if the numbers are correct. Most PL/1
users are in southern
I thought I could use IEBDG (Data Generator) to create a small file with a
single binary data record in it.
Let's take a simplified example.
I want to create a file with a 2 byte record with x'a1b2' as the contents.
I use FD to define two fields, each one byte long:
FD
Sorry, I forgot: many PL/1 users in Switzerland, too.
Kind regards
Bernd
Am 18.01.2012 00:53, schrieb Bernd Oppolzer:
We are a big insurance company in Germany, and we do PL/1 until today.
We also do ASM and C, but no COBOL - never.
I heard some years ago that only about 5 % of the
Linda,
A good question, I think he liked the 1100. He was completely self - taught, no
college, came straight out of WW2 and sent to work for then Remington Rand. He
working on typewriters and adding machines before computers made a big splash.
It was an interesting time. He was that school
John Gilmore writes:
Mr Altmark is again only marginally correct about the term
'underscore', as the OED quotations for it make clear, it is a
slightly antique term used literally.
The OED defines underscore, among other meanings, as: a key on
a computer or typewriter keyboard which produces a
Yes, and univacs 90 col cards
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 17, 2012, at 5:14 PM, William Donzelli wdonze...@gmail.com wrote:
Anyone remember the 96-column cards? I'd like to find a box of them.
Sure. Send your address offlist and I will
Omg, I initially skimmed your note. That was some experience. I have heard of
ppl looking under raised flooring to see water running over the top of the bug
and tag cables...that was a tad scary.
But to drop a machine, tap it and have it keep going amazing ...lol
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:55:30 -0600, Paul Peplinski wrote:
I think I have my terminology correct. I have a user who wants to print the
brackets, braces, carat, back slash, tilde and veticle bar? Where can I find
what resources contain those elements and what character set contains them?
Bernd,
Didn't know of the PL/1 popularity in Europe, interesting.
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 17, 2012, at 6:53 PM, Bernd Oppolzer bernd.oppol...@t-online.de wrote:
We are a big insurance company in Germany, and we do PL/1 until today.
Donald Russell at IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 01/17/2012 04:01:47 PM:
...
The hex data is constant, I just want it written to a new data set when a
job runs...
Is there another utility that can do this easily?
In a nutshell:
//S1 EXEC PGM=...
//SYSUT1 DD *
In
CAPD5F5oLMHY776o-PRL-PiFn19=zvKuhEm9cei=t-kwy9qj...@mail.gmail.com,
on 01/17/2012
at 02:43 PM, John Gilmore johnwgilmore0...@gmail.com said:
That said, Mr Altmark's rude comments
PKB.
are unhelpful.
Au contraire, his comments were helpful and yours were unhelpful.
--
Shmuel
In
93891f43642f3c419a7d75acc2b1db6f3c2a3fa...@exchangemb2.dhs.state.ia.us,
on 01/17/2012
at 05:22 PM, Roberts, John J jrobe...@dhs.state.ia.us said:
No doubt once they got past the F compiler and onto the many
Optimizing Compilers things must have improved.
In general, but the way they
In 4f15effc.1050...@ync.net, on 01/17/2012
at 04:02 PM, Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net said:
Anyone remember the 96-column cards?
You mean the business cards?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't
In 8119439416092473.wa.paul.peplinskiwpsic@bama.ua.edu, on
01/17/2012
at 03:55 PM, Paul Peplinski paul.peplin...@wpsic.com said:
I think I have my terminology correct.
c/veticle/vertical/
I have a user who wants to print the brackets, braces, carat, back
slash, tilde and veticle bar?
On 8 Jan 2012 14:11:36 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Clark,
Am new to all this, CBT, etc, so more than curious. Your CBT 175 points to
JOB and DD parsing but there are a whole slew of members therein - might I
ask which one in particular - or am I misunderstanding something:-(?
In 01b001ccd555$37c90880$a75b1980$@mxg.com, on 01/17/2012
at 02:18 PM, Barry Merrill ba...@mxg.com said:
State Farm, in 1973, was completely dependent on AUTOCODER which was
then running on 360/30s and 360/40s in the 25 regional offices,
I assume that was 1401 AUTOCODER. Be glad it wasn't
Let's take a simplified example.
I want to create a file with a 2 byte record with x'a1b2' as the contents.
I use FD to define two fields, each one byte long:
FD NAME=BYTE1,LENGTH=1,STARTLOC=1,PICTURE=161
FD NAME=BYTE2,LENGTH=1,STARTLOC=2,PICTURE=178
IEBDG definitely isn't an easy way to do
CECP if memory serves me correctly
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Jan 17, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net wrote:
In 8119439416092473.wa.paul.peplinskiwpsic@bama.ua.edu, on
01/17/2012
at 03:55 PM,
Hi,
In of our Webservice a user is not able to Invoke JVM, below are the
following error messages :
java version 1.6.0
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build pmz3160_26sr1-2014_01(SR1))
IBM J9 VM (build 2.6, JRE 1.6.0 z/OS s390-31 2013_94967 (JIT enabled,
AOT en
J9VM -
Hi folks,
In SDSF, normally we enter # as a prefix for RACF command. During system
shutdown process, we may use #STOP or %STOP to stop RACF.
Why the RACF command prefix is not displayed via system command /D OPDATA?
Where can I define/modify this command prefix?
looking forward to hearing from
Hi,
Adding to the below when the user is given the SECLABEL with SYSHIGH then
the JVM invocation is successful but providing a SECLABEL of SYSHIGH to a
normal user wont be right choice so I am just trying to understand the
correct level of SECLABEL that needs to be given to the user. IBM manual
The command prefix is set in the Subsystem definition.
Look for IRRSSI00 in IEFSSNxx.
Gadi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
dong dong Wang
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2012 9:00 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: RACF
67 matches
Mail list logo
