3277 terminals and emulators

Folks, I'm in the process of powering-up my System/3: http://www.corestore.org/3.htm One vital component I don't have is a console terminal. The System/3 uses a 3277 console - specifically, a 3277 Model 1 (yes, the 12 lines x 40 characters one!). So: 1. Does anyone reading this list have one, o

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 19:16 -0500, Michael Ross wrote: > Folks, > > I'm in the process of powering-up my System/3: Sorry Mike, can't help. However I showed your web page page to my other half, who's always complaining about the amount of "junk" I have around the place. My comment: "See, I ain't

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.comptuers as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Ross) writes: > So far, the only leads I have are that the 3270 card in the XT/370 desktop > mainframe machine did 3277 emulation - but I

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

DU Subject: 3277 terminals and emulators Folks, I'm in the process of powering-up my System/3: http://www.corestore.org/3.htm One vital component I don't have is a console terminal. The System/3 uses a 3277 console - specifically, a 3277 Model 1 (yes, the 12 lines x 40 characters one!).

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane > > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 19:16 -0500, Michael Ross wrote: > > > Folks, > > > > I'm in the process of powering-up my System/3: > > Sorry Mike, can't help. > However I showed your web page page to my other half

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

No, will not work. It might work if you can connect the machine to a modem though. I believe he has a 15D model. Looks very familiar to me from 25+ years ago. Also the fact it wants 3340/3344 drives. There should be an I/O cage in the back with a bunch of BNC connectors for coax attached termi

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/21/2008 at 02:14 PM, "Steele, Phil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Is the S/3 actually co-ax, or is it twin-ax like >the s/34, s/38 /as/400 family that it spawned? I'd blame the S/34 on the S/3, but not the S/38. The S/38 was an outgrowth of the FS project. --

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:08:28 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... >>Is the S/3 actually co-ax, or is it twin-ax like >>the s/34, s/38 /as/400 family that it spawned? > >I'd blame the S/34 on the S/3, but not the S/38. The S/38 was an >outgrowth of the FS project. >...

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

> >I'd blame the S/34 on the S/3, but not the S/38. The S/38 was an > >outgrowth of the FS project. > >... > > I thought the AS/400 grew out of the 8100, but I suppose it may > have had mixed parentage. (Or I may be remembering wrong.) The FS project begat the System/38 The System/38 begat the A

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

remembering wrong.) previous post in thread: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2008h.html#9 3277 terminals and emulators the folklore is that after future system project was terminated http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/subtopic.html#futuresys also this old post: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2001f.html#33

Re: 3277 terminals and emulators

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/29/2008 at 04:23 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I thought the AS/400 grew out of the 8100, No, the AS/400 grew out of the S/38 and the 8100 grew out of the 3790. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see