We run both CA-Datacom and DB2; my perception (not yet backed up by figures) is
that Datacom is considerably less resource-intensive than DB2. One thing I
hope to do this year is to figure out a way to compare their performance.
First I need to make sure they are reasonably well-tuned,
Actually, let me rephrase that statement: Datacom seems to be less
resource-intensive than DB2 *given the operating parameters and the workloads
at this shop*. There are so many differences between the way we use them that
may make a meaningful comparison all but impossible.
Jon
snip
We
On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:38:10 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 04/05/2006
at 09:10 PM, John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Our director point to this as see it's possible to migrate a large
scale applications off of a IBM mainframe and
Does anybody have any details on the size of the IBM mainframe that was
replaced in this migration?
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/3825/49/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
, 2006 9:12 AM
Subject: Any details on this migration
Does anybody have any details on the size of the IBM mainframe that was
replaced in this migration?
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/3825/49/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Giltner
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 8:12 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Any details on this migration
Does anybody have any details on the size of the IBM mainframe
John Giltner wrote:
Does anybody have any details on the size of the IBM mainframe that was
replaced in this migration?
http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/3825/49/
I was looking for a bit more details on which box(es) they were running.
My shop has decided to migrate most of our
7 matches
Mail list logo
