Is anyone using IBM 3592, Sun/STK 9940, or Sun/STK T1 cartridges for
HSM ML2? If so, have you had any issues (slow recall times, recall tape
takeaway, recycle, audit, duplexing, or other)?
If you can answer "yes" to the first question, please take a moment to
reply. Otherwise,
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:01:03 -0600, Friske, Michael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is anyone using IBM 3592, Sun/STK 9940, or Sun/STK T1 cartridges for
>HSM ML2? If so, have you had any issues (slow recall times, recall tape
>takeaway, recycle, audit, duplexing, or other)?
>
"Mark van der Eynden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>...
> On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:01:03 -0600, Friske, Michael
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Is anyone using IBM 3592, Sun/STK 9940, or Sun/STK T1 cartridges for
ehalf Of Mark van der Eynden
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyone Using IBM 3592, Sun/STK 9940, or Sun/STK T1
Cartridges for HSM ML2?
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:01:03 -0600, Friske, Michael
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Is anyone using IBM 3592,
On Mar 28, 2006, at 11:19 PM, Mark van der Eynden wrote:
SNIP
Just a point of curiosity here... I have been out of touch on this
and my knowledge maybe out of date.
With the new larger tapes there maybe more than the 255 file "limit"?
When was DFHSM (for that m
Just a point of curiosity here... I have been out of touch on this and
my knowledge maybe out of date.
With the new larger tapes there maybe more than the 255 file "limit"?
When was DFHSM (for that matter TMS) updated to allow for these
Longer more dense tapes?
I don't believe that the file nu
Ed Gould wrote:
Just a point of curiosity here... I have been out of touch on this and
my knowledge maybe out of date.
With the new larger tapes there maybe more than the 255 file "limit"?
When was DFHSM (for that matter TMS) updated to allow for these
Longer more dense tapes?
Was the fie
not sure if the
volume-count can go beyond 255 for a single file.
Russell Witt
CA-1 Level-2 Support Manager
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 2:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Anyo
On Mar 29, 2006, at 3:33 PM, Bruce Black wrote:
Just a point of curiosity here... I have been out of touch on this
and my knowledge maybe out of date.
With the new larger tapes there maybe more than the 255 file
"limit"? When was DFHSM (for that matter TMS) updated to allow for
these
Lon
On Mar 29, 2006, at 3:46 PM, John Eells wrote:
z/OS R7:
Extend Tape Table of Contents (TTOC) records to raise the DFSMShsm
limit on the number of data sets per tape to support more than
330,000 data sets per volume. This can provide better DFSMShsm
exploitation of new larger capacity tape
10 matches
Mail list logo
