List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Leif Rundberget
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 Tuesday 8:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Anyone using TCPAccess?
Norman, I did open an issue in March of 2009. I received the run-around
from CA for three months and that combined with the fact that
Norman, I did open an issue in March of 2009. I received the run-around
from CA for three months and that combined with the fact that many third
party vendors stopped supporting CATCPaccess is what put the nail in the
coffin to goto the IBM CS software.
I have been running this software on the sy
On Sun, 16 May 2010 17:35:39 +0200, R.S. wrote:
>
>Just curious: is there any technical advantage of TCPAccess?
>I understand that time&effort for migrations can be a reason for staying
>with the product, but maybe there are other reasons as well.
>
It doesn't rely on U(nix) S(ystem) S(ervices). (
W dniu 2010-05-15 02:40, Norman Hollander on DesertWiz pisze:
I would open a support issue. I wasn't aware of that status in 2008.
It still runs on our systems. Regardless, you should get help with
whatever problem you are experiencing.
Just curious: is there any technical advantage of TCPAcc
ehalf
Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 Friday 4:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Anyone using TCPAccess?
So it was functionally stabilized but not operationally stabilized?
:-)
On 5/14/2010 at 5:26 PM, in message
, Leif Rundberget
wrote:
> The CA-TCPaccess soft
So it was functionally stabilized but not operationally stabilized?
:-)
On 5/14/2010 at 5:26 PM, in message
, Leif Rundberget
wrote:
> The CA-TCPaccess software was functionally stabilized in April 2008. A year
> later we noticed stability issues with the software. And many third party
> softwa
The CA-TCPaccess software was functionally stabilized in April 2008. A year
later we noticed stability issues with the software. And many third party
software products don't support it anymore. I just got through migrating
from CA-TCPaccess to IBM Communications Server the beginning of this mont
My experience with TCPAccess dates way back before Websphere (and
probably SSL!) before it was a CA product... it was Interlink. At the time
it
seemed to work well, and support most things that IBM' TCP/IP did, although
every product or application that was to use it took some manual change
That is, the z/OS TCP/IP stack from CA? If so, do you use anything that relies
on IBM System SSL with it? I'm trying to verify that this works -- I can't
believe it doesn't (if it didn't, things like WebSphere would be shut out of
using TCPAccess, which I would think would have killed the produc
9 matches
Mail list logo
