Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-31 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <1910aea19cd2554fb59403184ebe4381029871e...@mmoexchmbs01.jhacorp.com>, on 10/20/2010 at 10:46 AM, Hal Merritt said: >Does this august group think it is worthwhile to go to the trouble >of doing this, or should I just assign random numbers? No. IBM provides tools for generating unique UID'

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>But employers need some kind of universal unique keys, not so tightly secured >so that, for example when employees terminate they can: Yes, but there are Federal regulations against certain numbers in use. In Canada, both SIN's & Emp#'s are restricted. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:57:07 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote: >>Use the employee number > >That's actually against the privacy laws in Canada. > >And, many companies use that number for access to HR systems, so it could be a >major security hole. > I guess the motivation is good. I didn't even bother t

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>Use the employee number That's actually against the privacy laws in Canada. And, many companies use that number for access to HR systems, so it could be a major security hole. - I'm a SuperHero with neither powers, nor motivation! Kimota! --

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:46:09 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote: > >We don't use OMVS and have no plans to do so except for the bare minimum >required. I did not choose to use the 'backstop' and so code a OMVS segment on >each user and group profile as appropriate. > If you have _any_ other in-house UNIX s

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Veilleux, Jon L
, October 20, 2010 11:46 AM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Subject: Assigning UID's Cross posted to MVS and RACF. We don't use OMVS and have no plans to do so except for the bare minimum required. I did not choose to use the 'backstop' and so code a OMVS segment on each user

SV: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Thomas Berg
> Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] För Hal > Merritt > Skickat: den 20 oktober 2010 17:46 > Till: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Ämne: Assigning UID's > > Cross posted to MVS and RACF. > > We don't use OMVS and have no plans

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:46:09 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote: > > >Cross posted to MVS and RACF. > > > >We don't use OMVS and have no plans to do so except for the bare minimum > required. I did not choose t

Re: Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:46:09 -0500, Hal Merritt wrote: >Cross posted to MVS and RACF. > >We don't use OMVS and have no plans to do so except for the bare minimum required. I did not choose to use the 'backstop' and so code a OMVS segment on each user and group profile as appropriate. > >Somehow I

Assigning UID's

2010-10-20 Thread Hal Merritt
Cross posted to MVS and RACF. We don't use OMVS and have no plans to do so except for the bare minimum required. I did not choose to use the 'backstop' and so code a OMVS segment on each user and group profile as appropriate. Somehow I have accumulated a number of (non human) profiles with UID