In <466682.32875...@web161405.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 05/17/2011
at 10:19 PM, Ed Gould said:
>One the other hand 3 pages is just plain overkill. A simple URL
>would have suficed
Unless it is rather large or there are currency issue, a quote is
preferable to a URL.
--
Shmuel (Seymour
2011 7:53:13 AM
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: non-module-PDS and VLF
In <105438.15379...@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 05/15/2011
at 09:47 PM, Ed Gould said:
>People write in whole complete sentences for a complete thought
>to be conveyed.
Some people do, sometimes. Some people sometim
In <009f01cc1355$5b8989b0$129c9d10$@hawkins1...@sbcglobal.net>, on
05/15/2011
at 04:11 PM, Ron Hawkins said:
>One could complain that there are some on the list that reply
>frequently, but don't actually add anything of value to the subject
>when they do.
Or that add negative value by provid
In <105438.15379...@web161401.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 05/15/2011
at 09:47 PM, Ed Gould said:
>People write in whole complete sentences for a complete thought
>to be conveyed.
Some people do, sometimes. Some people sometimes write perfectly
understandable sentence fragments.
>Take as an exam
: Monika Amiss
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 4:32:13 AM
> Subject: Aw: Re: non-module-PDS and VLF
>
>
> Hello Kees,
>
> thank you for your answer, which helps me very much. Is DLF an
option to cache
> the member data?
>
> Or - if i
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:29 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
---SNIP-
>
> So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
> or that it's too long.
>
> No. :)
>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HBZ8ulc5NTg
Hel
-SNIP---
So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
or that it's too long.
--
It is the word word replies (sorry I couldn't resist the first reply). People
write in whole complete sentences for a complete thought to be conveyed.
I
---SNIP-
So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
or that it's too long.
No. :)
---
Shmuel,
Not really.
One could complain that there are some on the list that reply frequently,
but don't actually add anything of value to the subject when they do.
That works for short and long responses.
Ron
>
> So it's a Catch 22; you'll either complain that the reply is too short
> or th
In <488338.78331...@web161408.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>, on 05/13/2011
at 09:57 PM, Ed Gould said:
>We seem to have a at least on contributor that answers with one word
>answers and you are left puzzling what he really means half the time
>that you have to spend 30 minutes analyzing the response.
Ed,
> I consider that cheaper and a lot less cumbersome than VLF.
> I was at one place and they had a good size turnover of Sysprogs and none
of
> them even thought about VLF after applying fixes.
> There was a decent number of head scratching as to why fixes didn't fix.
[Ron Hawkins]
VLF cachin
hen on the otherside we have several people who can spend yards of
replies and trying to follow some of the responses is as bad as the one word
responses.
Ed
From: Mark Zelden
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Fri, May 13, 2011 5:06:24 PM
Subject: Re: Aw: Re: non-
On Fri, 13 May 2011 13:33:35 -0700, Ed Gould wrote:
>Follow up to this question.
>
>Has anyone put the ISPF (load libs) in VLF and found it to help TSO response
>time?
>
>Ed
>
For many years. They are in the LNKLST, so they get LLA and VLF benefit.
I put other ISPLLIBs in the LNKLST also.An
Follow up to this question.
Has anyone put the ISPF (load libs) in VLF and found it to help TSO response
time?
Ed
From: Monika Amiss
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Thu, May 12, 2011 4:32:13 AM
Subject: Aw: Re: non-module-PDS and VLF
Hello Kees,
thank
Hello Kees,
thank you for your answer, which helps me very much. Is DLF an option to
cache the member data?
Or - if i convert the Dataset to PDS/E and use its caching, is it usefull to
leave the Dataset in LLA?
With best regards
Monika
- Original Nachricht
Von: "Ver
15 matches
Mail list logo
