I was going to open an issue with CA on this, but I cannot find
TCPaccess on the drop down box for "open an issue". So I'll ask here.
We are phasing out TCPaccess. We have tried to tell everybody to convert
their ftp from the CA stack to the IBM stack. There are still a few
"hold outs". What I'd l
U
Subject: CA's TCPAccess question.
I was going to open an issue with CA on this, but I cannot find TCPaccess on
the drop down box for "open an issue". So I'll ask here.
We are phasing out TCPaccess. We have tried to tell everybody to convert
their ftp from the CA stack to t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark, Kevin D,
> HRC-Alexandria/EDS
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 10:55 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CA's TCPAccess question.
>
>
>
In a message dated 3/17/2006 11:06:02 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We just converted from CA's FTP2 to IBM's FTP in batch by fiat (or some
other foreign car manufacturer, I forget ).
>>
Sounds more like Yugo...Yugo over here and leave us alone.
---
On 3/17/2006 12:03 PM, McKown, John wrote:
This is my concern. I don't want the IP address they are used to using
to just "drop dead". I would like to try to warn them. This is more to
help the "ad hoc" users. We have the z/OS batch and distributed servers
covered because we know them.
Why not
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Walt Farrell
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:50 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CA's TCPAccess question.
>
>
> On 3/17/2006 12:03 PM, Mc
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:56:56 -0600, McKown, John wrote:
>On Fri, 17 Mar 2006, Walt asked:
>> On 3/17/2006 12:03 PM, McKown, John wrote:
>>> This is my concern. I don't want the IP address they are used to using
>>> to just "drop dead". I would like to try to warn them. This is more to
>>> help the
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:41 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CA's TCPAccess question.
>
>
>
> Do your users ac
On my system, it's in member FTPGREET in the .HELP dataset (//SYSHELP and
//ARPAHELP).
Bob
McKown, John wrote:
I was going to open an issue with CA on this, but I cannot find
TCPaccess on the drop down box for "open an issue". So I'll ask here.
We are phasing out TCPaccess. We have tried to t
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Rutledge
> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:17 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: CA's TCPAccess question.
>
>
> On my system, it's in
To my surprise, I actually have the book at home:
"The system administrator can implement a custom login greeting by placing a
member named FTPGREET in the HELP data set. Unicenter TCPaccess searches for
this member on the first login to the FTP server after startup. If it is found,
its conten
I may be stating the obvious, but I assume you could record in the inbound
IP addresses for some period of time and trace them back to their
"owners," contacting each one by one in order to notify them of the
change.
- - - - -
Timothy F. Sipples
Consulting Enterprise Software Architect, z9/zSer
John,
I see you have your answer. This is a great list.
Try FTPGREET member in the .HELP dataset //SYSHELP
>
> I am checking on your real question.
>
> Kevin
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
UICI Insurance Center
Information Technology
This message (including any attachments) co
13 matches
Mail list logo
