Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-20 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
Thanks to all who offered suggestions. We typically have the VTS and ATL only on production here but are looking at ways to share it. The CBRUXENT question arose because of that. The way it works now is fine, so I'll see what else the other programmer is trying to do.

CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Daniel McLaughlin
One of our team is building a CBRUXENT for our 1.9 LPAR. He's trying to key off the identity of the LPAR. He tells me that PROD is 01, TEST is 02, and DEV is 03. However it comes out more like DEV is 01. OK, that is strange and we're not sure how it's picking up the information. We looked on

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Ted MacNEIL
We have 5 LPARs defined and they appear on that list in alphabetical order: DEV, PROD, TEST, VM, VMTEST. WAG says it's getting its relative number from there, but that hardly makes sense. Why does it not make sense? The LPAR's need to have their numbers from somewhere. The order they're defined

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Steven Conway
We have 5 LPARs defined and they appear on that list in alphabetical order: DEV, PROD, TEST, VM, VMTEST. WAG says it's getting its relative number from there, but that hardly makes sense. Issue D M=CPU, check the values for LP ID and MIF ID - maybe they will trigger something for you.

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Tommy Tsui
I suppose you can use the system name instead of LPAR no...it's hard to remember...my CBRUXENT is use the system name to identify each LPAR to insert the correct tape.. hope it can help you On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Steven Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We have 5 LPARs defined and

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Daniel McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... One of our team is building a CBRUXENT for our 1.9 LPAR. He's trying to key off the identity of the LPAR. He tells me that PROD is 01, TEST is 02, and DEV is 03. However it comes out more like DEV is 01. OK, that

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Daniel, Talking about inserting tapes: what do you need the LPAR ID for? We have several sysplexes on a VTS and an unmodified CBRUXENT. Kees. Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... I suppose you can use the system name instead of LPAR no...it's hard to

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Daniel, Talking about inserting tapes: what do you need the LPAR ID for? We have several sysplexes on a VTS and an unmodified CBRUXENT. Addition: we use CA1 and run the unmodified CBRUXENT provided by CA1. Kees. Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
Daniel, Talking about inserting tapes: what do you need the LPAR ID for? We have several sysplexes on a VTS and an unmodified CBRUXENT. Addition: we use CA1 and run the unmodified CBRUXENT provided by CA1. Kees. Tommy Tsui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL

Re: CBRUXENT Mystery

2008-11-19 Thread R.S.
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM wrote: [...] Mainview displays 2 numbers for an LPAR: the number of the logical partition and the customer defined MIF image ID number. I remember we had a similar numbers confusion and corrected this by setting both values equal. I am not sure where: in HCD or on the HMC.