Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-25 Thread Jim McAlpine
On 9/25/08, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation? The answer is YES; I've never understood why. - Because the CICS programs are loaded by the CICS loader and not by

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-25 Thread Ted MacNEIL
Because the CICS programs are loaded by the CICS loader and not by normal z/OS program loading mechanisms. I thought IBM was going to change that 20 years ago to make CICS easier to maintain. At least that's what a CICS SYSProg told me back then. - Too busy driving to stop for gas!

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-25 Thread Chase, John
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL ..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation? The answer is YES; I've never understood why. The CICS Loader Domain,

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-25 Thread Roland Schiradin
Such a change will perhaps never happen. CICS support storage protection for RENT programs since a long time before z/OS does this for NON APF programs. There are more nice features provided by CICS with some help from z/OS Roland Because the CICS programs are loaded by the CICS loader and

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-25 Thread Barkow, Eileen
] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 7:28 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation ..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation? The answer is YES; I've never understood

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-25 Thread John McKown
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:02:30 -0400, Barkow, Eileen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i think that the reason the loadlibs need to be in DFHRPL even if in linklist is because CICS does its own type of load of the modules from DFHRPL, not a MVS load which would come out of steplib/linklist. CICS now uses

CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-24 Thread Donnelly, John P
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-24 Thread Gibney, Dave
Yup -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Donnelly, John P Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:36 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation ..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-24 Thread John Hamman
ABSOLUTELY John Hamman Senior Systems Programmer BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi 601.664.4410 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Donnelly, John P [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/24/2008 11:35:34 AM ..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL

Re: CICS DFHRPLConcatenation

2008-09-24 Thread Ted MacNEIL
..if our CEE, MQ, and EQAW libraries are all in the system linklist must they still be specified in the DFHRPL concatenation? The answer is YES; I've never understood why. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN