Timothy Sipples wrote:
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM intends to deliver a software-based file encryption solution for z/OS
that leverages the existing z/OS key management capabilities provided
within the Integrated Cryptographic Services Facility
On Thu, 4 Aug 2005 11:15:23 -0400, Bruce Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBM intends to deliver a software-based file encryption solution for z/OS
that leverages the existing z/OS key management capabilities provided
within the Integrated Cryptographic Services Facility (ICSF) in 2005. More
Timothy, I just scanned the z/OS 1.7 announcement letter 205-167 (on the
IBM announcements site) and I can't find the reference you mention. I
searched for all references to crypt. Can you point me to the right
place?
Here it is:
IBM intends to deliver a software-based file encryption
IBM intends to deliver a software-based file encryption solution for z/OS
that leverages the existing z/OS key management capabilities provided
within the Integrated Cryptographic Services Facility (ICSF) in 2005. More
information will be provided at a later date.
It doesn't say tape so I
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/02/2005
at 09:32 PM, Joel C. Ewing [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Has anyone else out there looked at the overhead of encrypting all
tapes, which seems to be the approach some are advocating?
I wouldn't be that concerned about the overhead. However, have you
looked at
On 2 Aug 2005 21:47:45 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Joel wrote on 03/08/2005 12:32:05 PM:
Has anyone else out there looked at the overhead of encrypting all
tapes, which seems to be the approach some are advocating? The obvious
problem from the standpoint of efficiency is that
Has anyone else out there looked at the overhead of encrypting all
tapes, which seems to be the approach some are advocating? The obvious
problem from the standpoint of efficiency is that good encryption of the
data, which destroys apparent patterns in the data, will make tape
hardware
On Aug 2, 2005, at 9:32 PM, Joel C. Ewing wrote:
Has anyone else out there looked at the overhead of encrypting all
tapes, which seems to be the approach some are advocating? The
obvious problem from the standpoint of efficiency is that good
encryption of the data, which destroys apparent
It would seem like the best place to perform encryption if you really
needed it for most tapes is at the tape subsystem level, so you can
also let the tape hardware compression do its thing. Has IBM or
anyone else yet considered putting a crypto engine in the tape
subsystem, so both
Joel wrote on 03/08/2005 12:32:05 PM:
Has anyone else out there looked at the overhead of encrypting all
tapes, which seems to be the approach some are advocating? The obvious
problem from the standpoint of efficiency is that good encryption of the
data, which destroys apparent patterns in
10 matches
Mail list logo
