Hi John,
Short answer is it depends on what you are trying to achieve. Can you
please provide me with some additional details?
According to the command example below, this will update the clients on
the stream, but not the actual stream dataset associated with the tape
and the clients.
I
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:52:47 +1000, John Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Good Day All,
>
> I have to extend the expiration period of some tape dsn created by
EXHPDM. They have been set to Permanent on TMS. I checked the manual but I
am not sure if it is the right command to use because of the
Good Day All,
I have to extend the expiration period of some tape dsn created by EXHPDM.
They have been set to Permanent on TMS. I checked the manual but I am not sure
if it is the right command to use because of the SAVEGENS & WUNCAT parms:
To make the latest generation only of PRO
EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Dawes
Sent: Monday, 6 November 2006 11:48 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: EXHPDM QUESTION - REPORT
Hi all,
I am trying to extract a report form the HPDM database
Hi all,
I am trying to extract a report form the HPDM database for a certain time
period. All I have an example is as follows:
//ADMIN EXEC PGM=SOVADMN,PARM='SSNAME(SOV)'
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD *
ADMIN DB LIS
illie bunter
Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2006 10:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: EXHPDM - QUESTION
Last night one of our backup batch jobs too about 5 hours to complete as
opposed to the normal 1 hour 20 minutes. I checked the job but all
looks okay. I noticed that the following mes
We allow for 7 connections per job. We run 3 batch jobs concurrently. I
checked no changes have been made to the disks or batch jobs. I cannot confirm
if more initiators were opened. Since all operator commands have been
automated I would doubt that the operator would open up the initiators.
> We run 1 job at a time which allocates 24 tape drives.
Can you expand on that? For instance, we would run one volume dump job for
each volume. Then I had 6 drives available and set as the DeviceLimit.
Then I allowed 7 connections per drive. So Exhpdm would support a total of
6x7=42 connection
So far, my checking shows no drives being unavailable. I asked Computer
operations but they said all was fine with the drives. We run 1 job at a time
which allocates 24 tape drives. Nothing had been changed. I am browsing
through the syslog, so far nothing.
Jeffrey Deaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> "The specified connection is waiting for a stream task to become
available because the
> connection has WAIT(YES) specified (or defaulted) and no stream task is
currently able to
> process the connection."
Was something else running that was using one of the tape drives you
normally use? The
Willie,
I have always equated ExHPDM streams with devices (tape drives). Check to
see that all your tape drives are online and available. You might also
see messages previous to this one (SOV06045I) that would be helpful.
Cliff McNeill
Last night one of our backup batch jobs too ab
Last night one of our backup batch jobs too about 5 hours to complete as
opposed to the normal 1 hour 20 minutes. I checked the job but all looks okay.
I noticed that the following messages appears for various stream tasks. Here
is one of them.:
SOV06045I Connection ID 1183 for DD TAPE2
12 matches
Mail list logo
