received it in error please notify us immediately and
then destroy it.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Ross
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 4:57 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Workable Mainframe Debuggers
Hmmm, I find it interesting that I have
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:03:09 -0700, Paul Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
we go back to the old way - displays in the code.
Wasting time good for job
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 18:03:09 -0700, Paul Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
we
On 16 Apr 2008 07:16:33 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Don Leahy) wrote:
Every once in a while, we have time to waste - pulling up debugger
tools is as good of a way to fill that time as any.
soapbox
If a debugging tool is seen as a waste of time it is usually because
the installation hasn't put
At 4/14/2008 04:57 PM, Tom Ross wrote:
By the way, I think IBM has the only debugger for IBM C and C++ on z/OS.
Not for much longer.
Cheers,
TomR COBOL is the Language of the Future!
Dave Cole REPLY TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cole Software WEB PAGE:
David Logan wrote:
Apologies of a sort about this email. My outlook ...
Accepted of course, outlook should be renamed
'Look Out! Buggy Software' ... :)
I use Windows Vista with Office 2007 ... I *strongly* recommend *against* it
if anyone is thinking about it ...
Cool! That is one of the best
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
we go back to the old way - displays in the code.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 8:26 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Workable Mainframe Debuggers
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 10:35:07 -0600, David Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there are any function debuggers on z/OS these days.
Our shop is currently using z/OS 1.5, and the IBM provided LE debugger
(via the LE TEST options) is completely unusable for us. It always has
been.
On 14 Apr 2008 06:29:28 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown,
John) wrote:
Every once in a while someone pulls up a debugger tool, intending on
having that skill in our resume. But when we actually need to debug,
we go back to the old way - displays in the code.
Hum, I know for a fact that our
Hmmm, I find it interesting that I have two votes for IBMs Debug Tool, which
is completely unusable to me. We write C++ programs here. My main app is
something like 200 object modules.
When I write a Hello world test app, fire it up under IBMs debug tool, it
works great. When I try to debug our
I was wondering if there are any function debuggers on z/OS these days.
Our shop is currently using z/OS 1.5, and the IBM provided LE debugger
(via the LE TEST options) is completely unusable for us. It always has
been.
What suggestions might other people have?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:35 PM, David Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there are any function debuggers on z/OS these days.
Our shop is currently using z/OS 1.5, and the IBM provided LE debugger
(via the LE TEST options) is completely unusable for us. It always has
been.
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Don Leahy
Sent: Friday, April 11, 2008 11:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: Workable Mainframe Debuggers
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:35 PM, David Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was wondering if there are any function debuggers on z/OS these days
14 matches
Mail list logo
