Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread Peter Relson
It is very unlikely, for compatibility reasons, that the TCB and/or RB will ever move above 16M. Peter Relson z/OS Core Technology Design -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread Mohammad Khan
That's what I have known but I have been wondering what Roger Miller (an IBMer from Silicon Valley Lab, San Jose) meant when he wrote the following : The LSQA below the line storage was solved quite a while ago, although there are still parameters in z/OS, as some software could not tolerate

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread John McKown
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:36:31 -0600, Mohammad Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what I have known but I have been wondering what Roger Miller (an IBMer from Silicon Valley Lab, San Jose) meant when he wrote the following : The LSQA below the line storage was solved quite a while ago, although

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:36:31 -0600, Mohammad Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's what I have known but I have been wondering what Roger Miller (an IBMer from Silicon Valley Lab, San Jose) meant when he wrote the following : The LSQA below the line storage was solved quite a while ago, although

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread John Baxter
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line? On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:36:31 -0600, Mohammad Khan [EMAIL

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread John Baxter
.) -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John McKown Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2008 7:50 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line? On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:36:31 -0600, Mohammad Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line?

2008-11-20 Thread Edward Jaffe
John McKown wrote: I do not speak with authority, but I vaguely remember somebody saying that many DB2 functions (threads?) now run under SRBs instead of TCBs. I don't know if an SRB is allocated above the line or not. While executing, an SRB is not represented by a permanent control block

Has the TCB been moved above the line ?

2008-11-19 Thread Mohammad Khan
The following discussion took place on DB2-L which puzzles me (my ignorance off course !). I asked for more elucidiation but didn't get any replies there. Would someone please throw some light on this. So the question is - has the TCB been moved above the bar or these threads use another

Re: Has the TCB been moved above the line ?

2008-11-19 Thread Tom Marchant
On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 08:55:05 -0600, Mohammad Khan wrote: The following discussion took place on DB2-L which puzzles me (my ignorance off course !). I asked for more elucidiation but didn't get any replies there. Would someone please throw some light on this. So the question is - has the TCB been