I'm in too.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may co
Works for me just fine.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Chappell
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 9:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLINK -- AGAIN?
Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out
James (Jim) Chappell
I'm in - first try.
Alan Schwartz
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Jim Chappell
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLINK -- AGAIN?
Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out
Anybody else? . 504 Gateway Time-out
James (Jim) Chappell
503 745-7841
503 349-5603(cell)
james.chapp...@daimler.com
Daimler Trucks North America LLC
If you are not the intended addressee, please inform us immediately that you
have received this e-mail in error, and delete it. We thank
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 7:36 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Validation on client side was Re: IBMLink, again
>
>
> On 29
On 29 Mar 2008 17:33:40 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On 29/03/2008, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> There's a thread ongoing in MVS-OE on CGI security. The first
>> principle is: don't trust data received over the network. The
>> second is: don't trust Javascript
On 29/03/2008, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's a thread ongoing in MVS-OE on CGI security. The first
> principle is: don't trust data received over the network. The
> second is: don't trust Javascript validation on the client side.
> Always remember that your potential ad
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008 12:12:03 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>On 27/03/2008, Bruce Hewson wrote:
>
>> I would assume, like on some web screens we use here, that the text input
>> fields are not "transparent". By that I mean the characters entered are
>> treated
>> as HTTP control characters, or som
On 27/03/2008, Bruce Hewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would assume, like on some web screens we use here, that the text input
> fields are not "transparent". By that I mean the characters entered are
> treated
> as HTTP control characters, or something like that.
>
> I am trying to convi
Hi Gil,
I would assume, like on some web screens we use here, that the text input
fields are not "transparent". By that I mean the characters entered are treated
as HTTP control characters, or something like that.
I am trying to convince some of our local system builders that text input
fields
David
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 9:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink, again
You can get your ID unrevoked if you call the 800 number. They just wont
create new ID's anymore. Since the text was cutoff, I had to resort to
updating the PMR via the 3270 interface.
As
lf Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 6:35 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: IBMLink, again
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:01:13 -0400, Jousma, David wrote:
>I've got the same problem with two currently open etr's that contain a
>sting of hex data. It is entirely viewabl
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:01:13 -0400, Jousma, David wrote:
>I've got the same problem with two currently open etr's that contain a
>sting of hex data. It is entirely viewable on 3270 IBMLINK however.
>
Is that:
tn3270://ibmlink.advantis.com
... ? That tells me my ID has been revoked. I gue
6.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 7:05 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: IBMLink, again
My latest update to Record 79232,033,000:
RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY:
thanks
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My latest update to Record 79232,033,000:
RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY: cp-extent
Yow!
My latest update to Record 79232,033,000:
RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY: cp-extent
Yow!
I attempted to update this by adding
5:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IBMLINK again
Now I'm trying to open an etr and getting this message:
from web page:
The component ID you entered is not valid. Enter a valid component ID
or, if you cannot identify it, do one of these:
(a) leave the component ID blank and press En
Now I'm trying to open an etr and getting this message:
from web page:
The component ID you entered is not valid. Enter a valid component ID or,
if you cannot identify it, do one of these:
(a) leave the component ID blank and press Enter to see routing assistance
prompts;
(b) type 'unknown' in
At least you can get it to respond to you, which is more than I can achieve at
the moment.
Jon
> OK, in what language does "Envair" translate to Send or Submit, about
> half of some IBMLINK panels changed to a different language today.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rugen, Len
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:53 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: IBMLINK again
>
>
> OK, in what language does "Envair&quo
OK, in what language does "Envair" translate to Send or Submit, about
half of some IBMLINK panels changed to a different language today.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
21 matches
Mail list logo
