by the RMAX parameter in the
CONSOLxx parmlib member.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craig Kittendorf
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 5:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: IEE889I Clarification
In the IEE889I message, what
-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
These are in the message manual:
RPLY:CURR=
The number of write to operator with reply (WTOR) message buffers in
use by the system at this time.
RPLY:LIM=
The limit of the number of WTOR message buffers allowed outstanding
The solution is to issue K command to raise the limit but that still doesn't
tell be where all those buffers are being used
...
See the operator's manual.
There is a DISPLAY CONSOLE(s?), command.
I believe it also can be shortened, to D C
But, haven't issued one since 1981.
-teD
In God we
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Kittendorf
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 9:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
I did a D C and D C,B. The mysterious buffers weren't
I did a D C and D C,B. The mysterious buffers weren't reflected in NBUF
on any consoles.
Try issuing D R,M
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 7:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
The solution is to issue K command to raise the limit but that still
doesn't
tell be where all those buffers are being used
...
See the operator's manual
AMRF=Y
D R,A shows same two messages as D R,R
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 10:31 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
Hum, I don't know
D R,R,CN=(ALL) shows only 2 outstanding replies.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Big Iron
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 11:07 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I Clarification
How about D R,R,CN=(ALL
What you are describing sounds similar to this:
OA13112: WQE BUFFERS FOR FOREIGN WTORS ARE NOT DECHAINED AND FREED
IMMEADIATELY.
A specific fix for this item is not yet available electronically
This record will be updated with a link to the fix if the APAR is new.
For APARs older than 365 days,
to a
local WTOR). We've responded to many WTORs but the CURR= hasn't gone down.
Thanks
Craig
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dan Ahler
Sent: Thursday, November 03, 2005 1:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IEE889I
In the IEE889I message, what does RPLY:CURR=99 LIM=20 mean? I see 1
outstanding messages, not 99.
d c,b
IEE889I 18.27.04 CONSOLE DISPLAY 372
MSG: CURR=3LIM=2000 RPLY:CURR=99 LIM=20 SYS=CDCP PFK=01
11 matches
Mail list logo
