> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gates, Guy
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a thought. I had a user with a similar problem as he wanted to
set
> his screen size to 35x155 and started to fail when I installed z/OS
> 1.10. What we found out was that in TSOKEY00 the
Gates, Guy wrote:
We set them to:
HIBFREXT=48000,
LOBFREXT=24000,
Having small values here results in hang conditions writing large
screens, not a 24x80 (aka Mod2) appearance under ISPF.
FWIW, our values are set thusly:
HIBFREXT=96000,
LOBFREXT=48000,
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Hi,
Just a thought. I had a user with a similar problem as he wanted to set
his screen size to 35x155 and started to fail when I installed z/OS
1.10. What we found out was that in TSOKEY00 the buffersizes were too
small to support it and when we increased them he was able to use the
larger screen
Chris Mason wrote:
The TSO "environment" was most usefully "updated" in V1R11 at least with
the "logon here" function - long available in VM, it has to be said. Perhaps it
was some manifestation of "rigor mortis"!
TSO/E also recently got password phrase support.
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix S
IBM?
>
>On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Thompson, Steve <
>steve_thomp...@stercomm.com> wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
>> Behalf Of zMan
>> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:36 AM
&
, here are the first and last post from the
original thread - together with the dates in case anyone wanted to bother
researching the intervening "tangents":
Subject: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
-
From: "Mark T. Regan Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 10:38:53 -08
In , on 05/20/2010
at 03:48 AM, Nick Jones said:
>Sorry to pick up on this old post but we have just upgraded from z/OS
>1.9 to z/OS 1.11 and, like you, take advantage of screen sizes in
>excess of 62x160.
There are two distinct issues:
1. Screen geometry
2. Address size.
The 3290 works
In , on
05/20/2010
at 09:35 AM, zMan said:
>What's to explain? TSO is old and grotty, and supporting random
>screen sizes in fullscreen apps is a pain.
I've never had any trouble with nonstandard screen sizes in TSO.
Perhaps you're confusing ISPF with TSO.
BTW, I would expect nonstandard con
Nick Jones wrote:
Mark,
Sorry to pick up on this old post but we have just upgraded from z/OS 1.9 to
z/OS 1.11 and, like you, take advantage of screen sizes in excess of 62x160.
We have the same problem with ISPF 6.1 as you had with ISPF 6.0. i.e.
TSO obeys the terminal setting of 86x190, as d
20, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Thompson, Steve <
steve_thomp...@stercomm.com> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of zMan
> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:36 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Lar
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of zMan
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 8:36 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Nick Jones
wrote
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Nick Jones wrote:
> Mark,
> Sorry to pick up on this old post but we have just upgraded from z/OS 1.9
> to
> z/OS 1.11 and, like you, take advantage of screen sizes in excess of
> 62x160.
>
> We have the same problem with ISPF 6.1 as you had with ISPF 6.0. i.e.
>
Mark,
Sorry to pick up on this old post but we have just upgraded from z/OS 1.9 to
z/OS 1.11 and, like you, take advantage of screen sizes in excess of 62x160.
We have the same problem with ISPF 6.1 as you had with ISPF 6.0. i.e.
TSO obeys the terminal setting of 86x190, as does SELCOPY/i when ru
AIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Monday, March 2, 2009 9:29:09 AM
Subject: Re: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
BTW, we have opened up a ticket with IBM about this issue.
Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
From: "Mark T. Re
EPLY MODES
00078188 000102
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
0005818A 07
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
000C8195 00000800 08000101
IMPLICIT PARTITION
001181A6 0B01 5000 1800C800 41
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
00128197 0800 08000101 000B0401 CAFE
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
00068199
UN
00102
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
0005818A 07
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
000C8195 0800 08000101
IMPLICIT PARTITION
001181A6 0B01 5000 1800C800 41
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
00128197 0800 08000101 000B0401 CAFE
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIELD
00068199
UNREFERENCED STRUCTURED FIE
In <684353.97537...@web110708.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>, on 02/25/2009
at 10:38 AM, "Mark T. Regan, K8MTR" said:
>At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
>haveÿnoticed that 3270 customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132)
>isn t working with ISPF (ISPF 6.0) onÿz/O
John
The reason for the difference in the secondary receive maximum Request Unit
size is that the channel-attached, "A", controller had a maximum, 1536,
imposed by the hardware (microcode) whereas the "line"-attached, "C",
controller did not.
Chris Mason
On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:26:42 -0600, Ch
John
I assume we're talking about accessing z/OS 3270 applications using a TN3270
emulator client to a z/OS Communications Server (CS) IP TN3270 server.
When the TN3270 server was first provided in the early '90s in TCP/IP for VM
or MVS (as an "internal" server - although "client" to the main a
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of John McKown
>
> I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had
to
> specify a "queryable" logmode in my VTAM command which connected to
the
> system. E.g.
>
> tso logmode(sna3270q)
>
> where we
. Regan, K8MTR
CTO1 USNR-Retired (1969-1991)
From: John McKown
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 2:17:22 PM
Subject: Re: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it
John McKown wrote:
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had to
specify a "queryable" logmode in my VTAM command which connected to the
system. E.g.
tso logmode(sna3270q)
where we created a logmode called SNA3270Q which has the query bit on. When
I didn't do this, I g
I have a 43x162 working here on z/OS 1.10. However, to get it, I had to
specify a "queryable" logmode in my VTAM command which connected to the
system. E.g.
tso logmode(sna3270q)
where we created a logmode called SNA3270Q which has the query bit on. When
I didn't do this, I got a mod5 screen.
--
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
>
> At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
> have noticed that 3270
> customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132) isn’t working with ISPF
> (ISPF 6.0) on z/OS
k Pace
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:46:45 PM
Subject: Re: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
Check the settings in P.0 Screen Size 3.Max
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Mark T. Regan, K8MTR <
netsfw-ibmm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
have noticed that 3270 customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132) isn’t
working with ISPF (ISPF 6.0) on z/OS v1.10. I get defaulted to a MOD2 screen
size. Native TSO picks up the large screen size and NetView v5.3 on th
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Mark T. Regan, K8MTR
> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:39 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Large 3270 screen size and TSO/ISPF 6.0 on z/OS v1.10
>
Check the settings in P.0 Screen Size 3.Max
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Mark T. Regan, K8MTR <
netsfw-ibmm...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> At my site we are getting ready to upgrade from z/OS v1.9 to v1.10. I
> have noticed that 3270 customizable screen sizes (i.e. 65x200 or 60x132)
> isn’t wor
28 matches
Mail list logo
