---snip---
Have you tried using FBS vs. FB ? This is for fixed block standard and
recognizes the last block can be shorter and not a full block.
FB likewise permits the last block to be shorter.
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:24:35 +, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
we have a an NFS mount point on a Sun Solaris that is being serviced by MVS
(zOS 1.11) NFS server. when my customer dropped a file on the Sun's side NFS
mount point, it caused an I/O error. When I compared what I see on the Sun
under the Unix side compared to the
MVS side
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 22:24:35 +, Uriel Carrasquilla wrote:
we have a an NFS mount point on a Sun Solaris that is being serviced by MVS
(zOS 1.11) NFS server. when my customer dropped a file on the Sun's side NFS
mount point, it caused an I/O
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:31:44 +, Mingee, David wrote:
Have you tried using FBS vs. FB ? This is for fixed block standard and
recognizes the last block can be shorter and not a full block.
FB likewise permits the last block to be shorter.
-- gil
On 31 August 2011 13:31, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011 16:31:44 +, Mingee, David wrote:
Have you tried using FBS vs. FB ? This is for fixed block standard and
recognizes the last block can be shorter and not a full block.
FB likewise permits the last
Have you tried using FBS vs. FB ? This is for fixed block standard and
recognizes the last block can be shorter and not a full block.
FB likewise permits the last block to be shorter.
Surely FB permits *any* block to be short. It's FBS that requires
we have a an NFS mount point on a Sun Solaris that is being serviced by MVS
(zOS 1.11) NFS server. when my customer dropped a file on the Sun's side NFS
mount point, it caused an I/O error. When I compared what I see on the Sun
side under the mount point to what I see under TSO/ISPF, I can
7 matches
Mail list logo
