On Thu, 6 Sep 2007 17:57:47 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
>A few posts back the OP stated:
>To return on the 120 interface instead of the 20 FE/osa card interface
>We have two FE/OSA cards
>
>Which sounds to me like he is really asking how to get the other end to use a
>different IP address to co
A few posts back the OP stated:
To return on the 120 interface instead of the 20 FE/osa card interface
We have two FE/OSA cards
Which sounds to me like he is really asking how to get the other end to use a
different IP address to come back on. Confusing the port as something to do
with which OSA
ED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
>>>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>>>> Subject: Mainframe FTP
>>>> Sensitivity: Private
>>>>
>>>> I am trying to figure out where or how the port com
Bill Godfrey wrote:
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:21:18 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe FTP
Sensitivity
On Tue, 4 Sep 2007 14:21:18 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
>> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
>> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>> S
The context of 'port' is being confused, it has nothing to do with which
OSA port is used. It is the TCP port that is negotiated for the data
connection between the FTP client and the FTP server.
Philip Miscione wrote:
To return on the 120 interface instead of the 20 FE/osa card interface
We
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Miscione
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mainframe FTP
> Sensitivity: Private
>
> I am trying to figure
: Mainframe FTP
Sensitivity: Private
Why?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Philip Miscione
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe FTP
Sensitivity: Private
I am trying to figure out where or
Why?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Philip Miscione
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe FTP
Sensitivity: Private
I am trying to figure out where or how the port command gets
I am trying to figure out where or how the port command gets built in
this FTP job, I want to change it to
PORT 161,221,112,120,8,158
I can't find it anywhere in the JCL or sysin ?
331 Password required for mainframe.
EZA1701I >>> PASS
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 07/31/2007
at 09:58 AM, Allen Thennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am trying to execute a Unix Shell Script from the Mainframe via a
>FTP process.
FTP doesn't do that, although you could certainly submit a batch job
to run a shell script. Why not use SSH?
--
Jim McAlpine wrote:
On 7/31/07, Allen Thennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am trying to execute a Unix Shell Script from the Mainframe via a FTP
process.
Can it be done?
If so, can you provide a sample setup.
Regards,
Allen Thennes
IT- Production Support
Walgreen Co.
(847) 788-4648
-
FTP doesn't allow for remote execution of scripts.
Our Co:Z Co-Processing Toolkit allows you to do this (over an SSH
connection).
It also allows the Unix shell script read and write access to MVS
datasets over the same encrypted connection.
Output and return codes from the remote shell script a
On 7/31/07, Allen Thennes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am trying to execute a Unix Shell Script from the Mainframe via a FTP
> process.
>
> Can it be done?
>
> If so, can you provide a sample setup.
>
> Regards,
>
> Allen Thennes
> IT- Production Support
> Walgreen Co.
> (847) 788-4648
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Allen Thennes
> Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 9:59 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Execute a Unix Shell Script via Mainframe FTP
>
>
> I am trying to
I am trying to execute a Unix Shell Script from the Mainframe via a FTP
process.
Can it be done?
If so, can you provide a sample setup.
Regards,
Allen Thennes
IT- Production Support
Walgreen Co.
(847) 788-4648
--
For IBM-MA
Pi-R wrote:
Nobody, really?
Pi-R wrote:
Has anyone ever succeeded in creating a "My Nerwork Place" on Windows
attached to an FTP server on an IBM Mainframe? It seems to connect
successfully, but the Windows Explorer window that opens thereafter
contains the datasets description in the Name co
76155
( Phone:+1-817-355-5926)
+ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Singar Arthanarieswaran
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
We
ame to Mainframe FTP
In a recent note, Lou, Jim said:
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:49:26 -0500
>
> This is not true. You can ftp type=u.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Frank Krueger
> Sent: Wed
In a recent note, Lou, Jim said:
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2005 08:49:26 -0500
>
> This is not true. You can ftp type=u.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
> Behalf Of Frank Krueger
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:18 PM
>
This is not true. You can ftp type=u.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Krueger
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
Cause it is variable you can
In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said:
> Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2005 11:29:52 -0500
>
> >Some misconfigured 'black hole'
> >routers will silently drop packets or otherwise garble the data.
>
> Wouldn't TCP catch such?
>
Most TCPs. Not necessarily IBM's. To be fair, they fix such
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
12/07/2005
at 03:16 PM, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>This almost sounds like a network issue.
I'd guess that it's using stream mode instead of record mode.
>Some misconfigured 'black hole'
>routers will silently drop packets or otherwise garble the data.
We transfer VB files across LPAR's using FTP without tersing the file.
The following options works for us.
TYPE E
MODE B
Thanks
Nat
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECT
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Krueger
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 3:02 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
Matthew
i have tried to often and got errors when doing FTP from MVS to MVS
with VBS or U files . I am doing a lot of Studies with SMF Data
Of Hal Merritt
Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 2:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
The FM suggests MODE E TYPE C.
The FM also suggests that Binary (TYPE I) is not appropriate in this
situation.
Works for me.
-Original Message-
From: IBM
, then RECEIVE INDSN.
As said - i prefer TRSMAIN - cause sometimes i have to handle 5 GB
of TERSED SMF data which gives app. 40 GB SMF .
Frank Krueger
Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:33
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc:
From: Matthew Stitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Singar Arthanarieswaran
> Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2005 1:59 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
>
>
> We are tryi
ey can but contain garbage.
>
>Frank Krueger
>
>
>Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:09
>To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
>cc:
>From: Singar Arthanarieswaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
>
>
>
>We are trying to FTP a large file from mainfram
PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
We are trying to FTP a large file from mainframe to mainframe. The file
has lot of packed fields. We are using BINARY transfer. We have tried
all
the options including NOWRAPRECORD, RECFM, LRECL combinations, but the
file is wrapping
ntain garbage.
Frank Krueger
Mittwoch, 7. Dezember 2005 21:09
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc:
From: Singar Arthanarieswaran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Mainframe to Mainframe FTP
We are trying to FTP a large file from mainframe to mainframe. The file
has lot of packed fields. We are using BINA
We are trying to FTP a large file from mainframe to mainframe. The file
has lot of packed fields. We are using BINARY transfer. We have tried all
the options including NOWRAPRECORD, RECFM, LRECL combinations, but the
file is wrapping the records on the destination. Please note the file is a
Variabl
32 matches
Mail list logo
