Re: RMM & Tape Dataset Protection (was: discrete profiles for tape protection.)

2006-03-23 Thread John Benik
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: RMM & Tape Dataset Protection (was: discrete profiles for tape protection.) Bob, You do now have a very good understanding of how RMM is working with RACF to secure and validate tape volumes and data sets. As far as I can see, if you do not have TAPEVOL ac

Re: RMM & Tape Dataset Protection (was: discrete profiles for tape protection.)

2006-03-17 Thread Mike Wood
Bob, You do now have a very good understanding of how RMM is working with RACF to secure and validate tape volumes and data sets. As far as I can see, if you do not have TAPEVOL active - you lose any ability to control the use of BLP. This BLP authorization is only performed today if TAPEVOL is a

Re: RMM & Tape Dataset Protection (was: discrete profiles for tape protection.)

2006-03-14 Thread Robert S. Hansel (RSH)
Mike, This tread has prompted me to reread the RMM manuals to see where I may have misinterpreted them. Based on this review and comments from Russell and you, here is what I now understand. RMM will itself match the dsname and tape requested by the user against the list of dsnames contained on t