The DEVTYPE in the catalog is the actual value not the esoteric. The
only time there is an esoteric is if the catalog entry is created via
a Catalog Command (ie: IDCAMS/IEHPROGM/etc
that is true, since the DEFINE NONVSAM or CATLG command only knows the
esoteric or generic provided in the
We have removed our old 3480 drives. We still have our 3490E drives. A
3490E drive can read a 3480 cartridge. The question becomes: If I remove
the 3480 drive addresses from my IODF, will z/OS (1.6) automagically
allocate a 3490E drive for a 3480 cart, when accessed via the z/OS
catalog (no UNIT=
Probably have to keep using UNIT=CART.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Removed 3480 drives - question
We have removed our old 3480
sequence and fiddle with the device type.
HTH.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Removed 3480 drives - question
We have removed our old 3480 drives
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Removed 3480 drives - question
We have removed our old 3480 drives. We still have our 3490E drives
Probably have to keep using UNIT=CART
And point CART to a couple of newer drives.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Removed 3480 drives - question
Probably have to keep using UNIT=CART
And point CART
Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
PH Mining Equipment
414-671-7849
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Original Message -
From: McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 2:13 pm
Subject: Removed 3480 drives - question
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
We have removed our old 3480 drives. We
Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Removed 3480 drives - question
We have removed our old 3480 drives. We still have our 3490E drives. A
3490E drive can read a 3480 cartridge. The question becomes
If your jobs all used UNIT=3480, you're going to end up doing
search-and-replace on JCL because those aren't esoterics in your eligible
device table (EDT). It they were using UNIT=TAPE or UNIT=CART, the value
in the catalog (I believe, one of you with more expertise can correct me
if I'm
This is likely going to be classified as UNACCEPTABLE. sigh
And being unable to read the data is ACCEPTABLE.
IEBGENER, or some other copy programme, is your friend, if you're looking for
an (expensive) alternative.
BTDT.
3420 to 3480.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
This is likely going to be classified as UNACCEPTABLE. sigh
John McKown
John, is it Infopac recalls that is the concern? You can modify INEXIT11 to
change the UNIT TYPE on the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Shirey
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 3:55 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Removed 3480 drives - question
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Removed 3480 drives - question
This is likely going to be classified as UNACCEPTABLE. sigh
At 16:33 -0500 on 03/28/2006, Tim Hare wrote about Re: Removed 3480
drives - question:
If your jobs all used UNIT=3480, you're going to end up doing
search-and-replace on JCL because those aren't esoterics in your eligible
device table (EDT). It they were using UNIT=TAPE or UNIT=CART
15 matches
Mail list logo
