Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-10 Thread Kenneth E Tomiak
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:24:34 -0400, George Bly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We found that when we provided the sort work area DD's we would S0C4. When we took out all DD's the utility would run fine. From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Bly HI All We

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-07 Thread George Bly
- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Bly Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 7:22 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 HI All We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we are getting S0C4's in DFSORT when using DB2 utilities. I've read

SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread George Bly
HI All We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we are getting S0C4's in DFSORT when using DB2 utilities. I've read the informational APAR and I have it in correctly after my SyncSort libs. I am working with IBM but has anyone else run into this problem. By the way: IBMLINK went down

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread George Bly
We have sys1.sicelink and sys1.sortlpa in the right place. George -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laine, Rogers Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:44 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 We had

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Laine, Rogers
AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 HI All We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we are getting S0C4's in DFSORT when using DB2 utilities. I've read the informational APAR and I have it in correctly after my SyncSort libs. I am working with IBM but has anyone else

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread George Bly
Hi All We do have lnklst libs in the right spot. No steplibs in the utility jobs. But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO. IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump but we can't update the PMR. This is why it is important that IBMLINK be more reliable. George

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Knutson, Sam
Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast... -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Bly Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:48 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 We have sys1

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Laine, Rogers
AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 We have sys1.sicelink and sys1.sortlpa in the right place. George -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Laine, Rogers Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:44 AM To: IBM

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Ed Gould
On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:42 AM, George Bly wrote: Hi All We do have lnklst libs in the right spot. No steplibs in the utility jobs. But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO. IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump but we can't update the PMR. This is why it is important that

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Gerri Booth, State of Wisconsin
A few weeks ago someone at IBM support provided us with the following URL that allows us to open/view/update PMRs when IBMLink is down. I've found it very useful. We have Software Excel Extended contract with IBM, so I don't know if this URL will work for everyone.

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:08:31 -0500 Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:42 AM, George Bly wrote: : We do have lnklst libs in the right spot. : No steplibs in the utility jobs. : But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO. : IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Tergerson, John
of the original message immediately. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Bly Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:22 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 HI All We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Tergerson, John
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tergerson, John Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 George, We got an 0C4, and also a U0083 symptom using DFSORT to do reorgs on a tablespace with a lot of indexes. The DBA had set up

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread David Betten
copies of the original message immediately. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tergerson, John Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:21 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 George, We got an 0C4

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread O'Brien, David W. (NIH/CIT) [C]
That would be the Data class not the Storage class. From: David Betten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 12:16 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2 I don't want to circumvent the PMR process but thought I'd offer some

Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2

2007-08-01 Thread Ed Gould
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:16 AM, David Betten wrote: I don't want to circumvent the PMR process but thought I'd offer some a thought based on this information. Double check the storage class that the sortwork datasets are being assigned to and make sure the default unit count is 1. Sortwork