On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 13:24:34 -0400, George Bly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We found that when we provided the sort work area DD's we would S0C4.
When we took out all DD's the utility would run fine.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Bly
HI All
We
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Bly
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 7:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
HI All
We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we are getting S0C4's in DFSORT when
using
DB2 utilities.
I've read
HI All
We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we are getting S0C4's in DFSORT when using
DB2 utilities.
I've read the informational APAR and I have it in correctly after my
SyncSort libs.
I am working with IBM but has anyone else run into this problem.
By the way: IBMLINK went down
We have sys1.sicelink and sys1.sortlpa in the right place.
George
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Laine, Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
We had
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
HI All
We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we are getting S0C4's in DFSORT when
using
DB2 utilities.
I've read the informational APAR and I have it in correctly after my
SyncSort libs.
I am working with IBM but has anyone else
Hi All
We do have lnklst libs in the right spot.
No steplibs in the utility jobs.
But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO.
IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump but we can't update the PMR.
This is why it is important that IBMLINK be more reliable.
George
Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Bly
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
We have sys1
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
We have sys1.sicelink and sys1.sortlpa in the right place.
George
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Laine, Rogers
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:44 AM
To: IBM
On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:42 AM, George Bly wrote:
Hi All
We do have lnklst libs in the right spot.
No steplibs in the utility jobs.
But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO.
IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump but we can't update
the PMR.
This is why it is important that
A few weeks ago someone at IBM support provided us with the following URL
that allows us to open/view/update PMRs when IBMLink is down. I've found it
very useful. We have Software Excel Extended contract with IBM, so I don't
know if this URL will work for everyone.
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 09:08:31 -0500 Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:42 AM, George Bly wrote:
: We do have lnklst libs in the right spot.
: No steplibs in the utility jobs.
: But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO.
: IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump
of the original message immediately.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Bly
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 8:22 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
HI All
We went to DB2V8 this week. Now we
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tergerson, John
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
George,
We got an 0C4, and also a U0083 symptom using DFSORT to do reorgs on a
tablespace with a lot of indexes.
The DBA had set up
copies of the original message immediately.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tergerson, John
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:21 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
George,
We got an 0C4
That would be the Data class not the Storage class.
From: David Betten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SOC4 in DFSORT with DB2
I don't want to circumvent the PMR process but thought I'd offer some
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:16 AM, David Betten wrote:
I don't want to circumvent the PMR process but thought I'd offer
some a
thought based on this information. Double check the storage class
that the
sortwork datasets are being assigned to and make sure the default unit
count is 1. Sortwork
16 matches
Mail list logo