Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>But the log can also serve as an audit trail for dataset creates, renames, and >deletes. So can SMF. - Too busy driving to stop for gas! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL P

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 11:54:16 -0700, Edward Jaffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >John P Kalinich wrote: >> Yes, very useful. I run with the log and list allocated to a SYSOUT hold >> class. So far today I have around 100 or so lines in the log. >> > >It's hard to imagine that kind of low activity lo

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Don Leahy
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don Leahy wrote: > > IMO, it should be turned off by default. Users who develop ISPF > > dialogs should be able to figure out how to turn it on for themselves. > > > > My $0.02 > > > > But the log can also serve as an

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Edward Jaffe
John P Kalinich wrote: Yes, very useful. I run with the log and list allocated to a SYSOUT hold class. So far today I have around 100 or so lines in the log. It's hard to imagine that kind of low activity logging could ever be perceived as slowing things down. Look at how much goes into a

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Steve Comstock
Don Leahy wrote: On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:05 PM, John P Kalinich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Tom Marchant of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/15/2008 12:54:39 PM: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:38:34 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote: >> >>Logging is only necessary when you are tracing

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Don Leahy
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 2:05 PM, John P Kalinich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tom Marchant of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List > wrote on 04/15/2008 12:54:39 PM: > > > > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:38:34 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote: > >> > >>Logging is only necessary when you are tracing variable

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread John P Kalinich
Tom Marchant of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/15/2008 12:54:39 PM: > On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:38:34 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote: >> >>Logging is only necessary when you are tracing variable and function calls >>with Dialog Test (Option 7). > > You forgot to say, "IMO". > > I find i

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Tom Marchant
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:38:34 -0500, John P Kalinich wrote: > >Logging is only necessary when you are tracing variable and function calls >with Dialog Test (Option 7). You forgot to say, "IMO". I find it useful. -- Tom Marchant ---

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>I've never seen anyone who could tell a performance imapct of keeping it on. >Either system wide or individually. >Ted, do you have any response time numbers or overhead numbers? Not lately, but I have seen it in a small shop with limited TSO DASD. Besides, the best I/O is no I/O. I convinced

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:38:34 -0500, John P Kalinich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Two points: >> > 1. It's in the config utility (ISRCONFG?) somewhere. >> > 2. Why do you want to slow your ISPF session down by logging? >> > >> >> #2 - Being an MVS newbie, I don't why you would or wou

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>#2 - Being an MVS newbie, I don't why you would or wouldn't want logging. >It comes out of the box turned on, and I didn't know you could turn it off. Logging introduces overhead that you don't really need. On the command line type log. Then set the initial page size to "0". - Too busy driving

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 6:58 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SPFLOG >Why not contribute it to the CBTTAPE site? Sam G. is generally

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Mark Pace
Ah - Sure don't need that. I'll be figuring out how to turn that off. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 8:38 AM, John P Kalinich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mark Pace of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List > wrote > on 04/15/2008 07:27:10 AM: > > > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Ted MacNEIL <[E

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread John P Kalinich
Mark Pace of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/15/2008 07:27:10 AM: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Two points: > > 1. It's in the config utility (ISRCONFG?) somewhere. > > 2. Why do you want to slow your ISPF session down by lo

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-15 Thread Mark Pace
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Two points: > 1. It's in the config utility (ISRCONFG?) somewhere. > 2. Why do you want to slow your ISPF session down by logging? > #2 - Being an MVS newbie, I don't why you would or wouldn't want logging. It comes out

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread Rick Fochtman
--- You need to install ISPEXIT number 16. I already have such a thing which creates DSNs of "userid.SYS&SYSNAME. ...". However, this may not be all that you need. You also need to use a different ISPF profile dataset on each system. That's because ISPF do

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread Ted MacNEIL
>I hate to ask this question, but I have searched and searched and can not find >where the SPFLOG list dataset name is defined. I have 2 systems sharing data, and I want to rename the *userid*.SPFLOG1.LIST dataset to something system specific so that I can log on the each system with th

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Zelden > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 4:01 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: SPFLOG > > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:58:08 -0500, McKown, John

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Zelden
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 14:58:08 -0500, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >You need to install ISPEXIT number 16. I already have such a thing which >creates DSNs of "userid.SYS&SYSNAME. ...". However, this may not be all >that you need. You also need to use a different ISPF profile dataset on

Re: SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2008 2:35 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: SPFLOG > > > I hate to ask this question, but I have searched and sea

RES: SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
Discussion List |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de Mark Pace |Enviada em: segunda-feira, 14 de abril de 2008 16:35 |Para: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU |Assunto: SPFLOG | |I hate to ask this question, but I have searched and searched |and can not find where the SPFLOG list dataset name is |defined. I

SPFLOG

2008-04-14 Thread Mark Pace
I hate to ask this question, but I have searched and searched and can not find where the SPFLOG list dataset name is defined. I have 2 systems sharing data, and I want to rename the *userid*.SPFLOG1.LIST dataset to something system specific so that I can log on the each system with the same