In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 11/10/2005
at 08:04 AM, Knutson, Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Have they opened an issue with SCO
SCO might be less than cooperative if they discover that they are
talking to an IBM customer. Gppgle for SCO and lawsuit.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and
Hi folks
We upgraded from OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 at the weekend. Since then, ONE of our 1100
FTP clients cannot get in.
We have a third-party product that sits in front of our FTP server, providing
additional RACF and other functionality. This product is failing the user's
signon because they
/OS 1.4 FTP server - quite urgent
Hi folks
We upgraded from OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 at the weekend. Since then, ONE of
our 1100 FTP clients cannot get in.
We have a third-party product that sits in front of our FTP server,
providing additional RACF and other functionality. This product is
failing
Thanks Sam
That's more or less what we were saying but the customer is quite adamant that
they have no command-line switches on their FTP process (we haven't seen it, so
have no idea).
It also, as our third-party software's vendor pointed out, does not explain why
we didn't see this
On 11/10/2005 8:15 AM, Perryman, Brian wrote:
It also, as our third-party software's vendor pointed out, does not explain why
we didn't see this command/behaviour on our OS/390 2.9 before the upgrade to
z/OS 1.4..
Would the fact that the our FTP server didn't support Kerberos until
z/OS R2
: Thursday, November 10, 2005 6:28 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Secure z/OS 1.4 FTP server - quite urgent
Hi folks
We upgraded from OS/390 to z/OS 1.4 at the weekend. Since then, ONE of
our 1100 FTP clients cannot get in.
We have a third-party product that sits in front of our FTP server
6 matches
Mail list logo
